Spam Factory

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:27 pm

HBI Duties

Judge - Dragon Wench

Jury (3+)- Juniper1028

Prosecutors (2-3)- Hill-Shatar, Slade

Defense Attorney (2-3)- Phreddie

Head of Investigations (HBI)- Luis Antonio

Interrogator- Lestat

Investigators -(some for prosecuting others for defense)-Ikky
any one can be an investigator they gather and bring evidence to court

So far this is what I have come up with any suggestions. The numbers in pararenthathese is the amount of people allowed for the duty.

I will post this in the HC once I get your thoughts on this.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:30 pm

I dont think that head of investigation should be open for election this term, it should be given to luis for starting ivestigation thread, or he can be an honorary thread, i think juries should be elected after an investigation is closed and before a trial begins, no permanent jurors, for now, and i tihnk that elections hsould beheld once every month or once every two months, so that people dont have too much power for too long.

Lestat · Post by **Lestat** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:31 pm

[QUOTE=slade]Judge (1)-

Jury (3+)-

Prosecutors (2-3)-

Defense Attorney (2-3)-

Head of Investigations (1)-

Investigators -(some for prosecuting others for defense)
any one can be an investigator they gather and bring evidence to court

So far this is what I have come up with any suggestions. The numbers in pararenthathese is the amount of people allowed for the duty.[/QUOTE]
Nobody to rough the prisoners up a bit, I mean I can let the tools be, just a drawer is sufficient.

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:34 pm

[QUOTE=Lestat]Nobody to rough the prisoners up a bit, I mean I can let the tools be, just a drawer is sufficient.[/QUOTE]

give your job name and ill fit it in

@Phreddie, head of investigations...luis?..Done

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:34 pm

We should add a Lt. Detective to serve as a second in command to Chief.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:36 pm

I will run for judge VOTE FOR ME IM <insert corny politcal campaign slogan here>!
Slade i said it before youd be a good prosecutor, you up to it?

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:38 pm

[QUOTE=Phreddie]We should add a Lt. Detective to serve as a second in command to Chief.[/QUOTE]

Luis can decide who should take his place when he is not on line.
Rotating the jury is a good idea but I dont know if well have enough people to keep it rotating.

you a judge I dont know...your still knew here....people might not take this serious...lets wait and see waht the others say.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:40 pm

[QUOTE=slade]Luis can decide who should take his place when he is not on line.
Rotating the jury is a good idea but I dont know if well have enough people to keep it rotating.[/QUOTE]
all im saying is that jury should not be a permanent position like atorney or judge, we use who we have when they are on....
and r u running for anytihng?

Lestat · Post by **Lestat** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:41 pm

[QUOTE=slade]give your job name and ill fit it in[/QUOTE]
Lets call it ... interrogator, shall we? (oh and I meant roughing up the prisoner in its litteral sense)

Hill-Shatar · Post by **Hill-Shatar** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:43 pm

I see... what is going on?

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:44 pm

@ Lestat.Literal? Surely you would need tools for that? At least a fork

@ Hill. They're having an election to legitimise corruption and torture

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:45 pm

Ah, hill just in time for the election, go read in hte HBI, youll see the birth and progression of this idea, i am running for judge, ill be a defense attourney if i lose that, i tihnk slade would be good on prosecutor but he hasnt said anytihng yet, you cna run for what ever you like.

@slade: i know im new, i have no prior bias on which to base my rulings, makes me a better judge.

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:46 pm

[QUOTE=Lestat]Lets call it ... interrogator, shall we? (oh and I meant roughing up the prisoner in its litteral sense)

[/QUOTE]

Done.....

@Hill ,we are assigning duties for the HBI so that we are better organized and dont spam of topic.....would you care to join and choose one or think up a duty to serve HBI.

Lestat · Post by **Lestat** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:48 pm

[QUOTE=Fiona]@ Lestat.Literal? Surely you would need tools for that? At least a fork[/QUOTE]Just a drawer. Open, close.

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:49 pm

How does that make them rough ?

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:49 pm

[QUOTE=Fiona]@ Lestat.Literal? Surely you would need tools for that? At least a fork

@ Hill. They're having an election to legitimise corruption and torture[/QUOTE]
Now, now my dear, we are trying to stabilize and orgnize the HBI so as to provide a safer environment for our fellow SYMians, we will do all that is in our power to protect the rights of fellow posters,however if certain rights of certain individuals must be violated to ensure the common good, we of the HBI will not hesitate to take the necessary action(s) to ensure your liberties are protected, any officer going above and beyond the call of duty will be commended for his or her service, however any officer outreaching the bounds of his authority by violating ones rights where there is no clear justification, the officer will be brought up for trial to answer for his actions and will be sentenced accordinly. In this agency, the ends never justify the means.

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:50 pm

As for me I dont know if Im up for being a prosecutor...Fiona would you like to be one with me

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:51 pm

@ Phreddie. Now where have I heard that before ? *flees the country*

@ Slade. No. I have seldom been so frightened by an idea.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:53 pm

Of all the currently active senior members here i would like to ask a question, slade has been slightly oposed to my position of choice, would i or would i not make a suitable judge for the HBI? I believe that my newness and my innocence, not ignorance, would make me a suitable candidate for a position that requires me to be an impartial arbiter of court proceedings both criminal and civil.

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:55 pm

[QUOTE=Fiona]
@ Slade. No. I have seldom been so frightened by an idea.[/QUOTE]

....Then a Defense Attorney...or which would you prefer?

GameBanshee Forums

Spam Factory

Whats your favorite sport?