GameBanshee Forums

No, not that one. It's not that high. This one was all by itself. Wasn't part of an full adventure path.

I should have written it down at the time, but my PCs will be hitting epic level fairly soon. I was wanting to do an adventure about fighting a fallen god. I know it's in Dungeon magazine, but I can't seem to find it anymore. I think that it ended around level 28.

Help in tracking this down would ...

Ofcourse, those are a necessity. I always found it strange that the so-called most powerful monster has no access to flight.
That's why you have a DM like ours add it to it. The group killed the original one off about two campaigns ago, so the God we had to face off again last year decided that it ...

GawainBS wrote:The Tarrasque is in fact a dead easy monster, if you have access to some sort of flight.

Well two of the five in the group can do that. The rest of us are just able to swim.

If taking FE:A means you'll never face Wizards, I'd certainly take it. :p
lol That is a very good point. I hadn't thought of it that way. Just means ridiculous monsters like the Tarrasque, and hordes of gargoyles. Honestly, I can't remember the last time we fought an arcane user. Lately it's been ...

The problem is lack of attacks. Right now I've got four per round, and only one level of Favored Enemy with my Mystic Ranger. Even if I am out one round, I can make it up the following round and do 1d8+1+1+1+5 four times for everything I've got (Str, bow +1, Point Blank Shot) within thirty feet. Or ...

My point exactly: you waste a round initiating the ability, instead of doing extra damage. The higher your base damage, the more you want to full attack.
True, but that's the only compromise he's giving me besides the suggestion of taking Skirmish as the Scout. So move 10ft, gain +1d6 damage, but ...

If it takes a standard action it sucks. You'd probably get more damage from an extra fullattack than from the FE bonus.
Oh no, I still get to use my full attack, it's just that it takes a round for the ability to kick in. Think of it as a spell that you don't gain any benefits from until the ...

GawainBS wrote:It gives a bonus on damage vs all your favoured enemies.

Yeah, With the new change on FE that the DM's giving me, that'll be a pretty good feat to take considering I won't be able to get Weapon Focus, Specialization, and Ranged Mastery.

I have to take Knowledge: Arcana anyways for the Supernatural feat that the DM wants me to take, so that'd be fine. He's agreed to give me a variant on Favored Enemy that he had on his Ranger back when the Pathfinder book first came out. Essentially, instead of retraining the ability for a week, to ...

GawainBS wrote:We're talking about the one in the Complete Warrior.

I know. That's why I was asking what that one says.

Maybe Favoured Enemy (Arcane) is something for you: it applies the bonus against everything that has arcane spells or spell-like abilities. A surprising amount of monsters has those. It's from Complete Mage.
You know? I can't really disagree with that. A lot of things do have spell-like abilities ...

That's an idea. I'll try put that past him if he says no to everything else (and he most likely will). As for the monsters, it might as well be that way. I don't know if he does it on purpose (I can think of a few people who'd say he does), but essentially if you have an advantage over something, he ...

This is what mine says:

Improved Favored Enemy [Epic]
Prerequisite: Five or more favored enemies.

Benefit: Add +1 to the bonus on Bluff, Listen, Sense Motive, Spot, and Survival checks and damage rolls against all the character’s favored enemies.

Special: This feat may be taken multiple times ...

I need something to replace my Ranger's Favored Enemy, and something more than just Favored Organization or Environment. Have you ever had a DM that constantly changes enemies on you? Or lets you think you have an advantage, only to have it snuffed out from under you? In my case I find my character ...

GawainBS wrote:Consider Improved Favoured Enemy (feat, Complete Warrior) as well.

Dude, that's Epic only.

GawainBS wrote:Why the obessession with a PrC? More levels of Mystic Ranger are better than even the regular Stalker.

I want the Favoured Enemy: Evil and Ranged Smite abilities. The DM said I could take them as feats if I meat the requirements (required feats, BAB, base saves, skills, etc).

and we know how much your DM likes gear. ;)
Or giving us the money to actually afford gear. :rolleyes: Alright. I'll just have to figure something else out then for what feats I'll be taking as the Monk. Combat Reflexes I'll still do at lvl 2, but I didn't want to take Stunning Fist at lvl 1 ...

GawainBS wrote:Fanmade, and it's a lot worse than the standard Stalker, since Ranger spellcasting is actually quite good, especially for an archer.

Shoot. But this is the problem. I'm not allowed the regular Stalker. The DM said so. I need a variant that's either non-spellcasting, or works with the Mystic Ranger.

Can anyone tell me if this variant on the non-spellcasting Stalker of Kharash is from anywhere in particular, or if it is fanmade? I just found it on the D&D forums.

The reason I'm wanting to know this, is I'm currently a Mystic Ranger (Ranger variant), and the regular Stalker of Kharash's +1 to ...