Originally posted by RandomThug
And my next issue, Military Spending.
(Added to check list)
Originally posted by Tybaltus
Good good....we dont need any more crazy liberals wandering around.
Sounds good to me...consider Tropicalis a friend of the citizens of Kayland.
Originally posted by Tybaltus
But please notice, I am no war-loving, crazed maniac...really.
Originally posted by fable
I decided to endorse a platform of complete free speech. Now, my nation's precis has this line added to it:
"Fablicious's children are widely acknowledged as the most foul-mouthed in the region."
That's ***** the *** ******* ****, you ****** **** ****** kids!
Originally posted by Chanak
The Issue
The increasingly militant Animal Liberation Front struck again last night, freeing dozens of chickens bound for delicious snack packs.
4. Economist George W. Thiesen has an alternative. "You don't need to take away the people's right to choose. You just need to build the costs of animal suffering into the price. A tax on meat-eating, in proportion to the amount of cruelty involved, would do the trick. Plus think of the benefit for the national coffers! Of course, poor people wouldn't be able to afford meat, but that's just more incentive for them to get jobs."
The Government Position
The government has indicated its intention to follow the recommendations of Option 4.
Originally posted by VoodooDali
Boy oh boy...that's harsh! Also, when the poor have no meat to eat, they will not have as much energy to work, and their children will have their growth stunted...Won't it affect your economy?
Originally posted by VoodooDali
The Rogue Nation of VoodooDaliania would like to make an alliance with The Republic of Gwaltopia.