Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Bush Urges Nation To Be Quiet For A Minute While He Tries To Think

Anything goes... just keep it clean.
User avatar
TheAmazingOopah
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 7:26 am
Location: The Lower Lands
Contact:

Bush Urges Nation To Be Quiet For A Minute While He Tries To Think

Post by TheAmazingOopah »

This "article" is already from a few weeks back, but I thought it funny enough to share. Enjoy. :p

Bush Urges Nation To Be Quiet For A Minute While He Tries To Think | The Onion - America's Finest News Source

Bush Urges Nation To Be Quiet For A Minute While He Tries To Think
-August 30, 2006

WASHINGTON, DC—In a nationally televised address Monday, President Bush urged all citizens, regardless of race, creed, color, or political affiliation, "to quiet down for just one minute" so he could have "a chance to think."

In a televised address to the nation, Bush called for "a little peace and quiet."
"Every American has an inalienable right to free speech and self-expression," Bush said. "Nonetheless, I call upon the American people to hold off on it for, say, 60 seconds. Just long enough for me to get this all sorted out in my head."

"Please," Bush added.

While the president said achieving a unilateral peace and quiet "would not be easy," he hoped that citizens would respect his wish and work toward a temporary cease-talk so that he could can hear his own thoughts "for once."

"Make no mistake: It will take patience and sacrifice," Bush said. "But such drastic measures could lead to a better tomorrow for all of us, especially for your commander in chief."

Bush then closed his speech by exhaling sharply, tightly closing his eyes, and massaging his temples. "I just—Christ, I just need a goddamn minute, you know?" he said.

The presidential call for national silence came as little surprise following weeks of rumors from White House sources that Bush appeared increasingly distracted and wearied by the ever-pervasive noise. Excerpts from an unedited videotaped meeting made public last Thursday revealed a frustrated Bush rhetorically asking Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan how "the leader of the free world was supposed to get any work done around here with all this volume."

Assuring the public it "can make as much noise as [it] wants" as soon as the Bush-proposed national minute of silence concludes, Chief Of Staff Josh Bolten said that the White House was making "every effort" to accommodate Bush's wishes.

"Currently, the president's calls are being bounced back to the West Wing call center, and all televisions and radios on White House property have been switched off," said Bolten, who added that staffers moved Bush family dog Barney from the Oval Office after Bush called the Scottish terrier's heavy panting "intolerable."

Bush, during calmer, quieter times, vacationing at his Crawford, TX ranch in August 2005.
Several world leaders, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Chinese President Hu Jintao, reacted to Bush's speech by openly wondering if Bush's request pertained to them.

"I think he meant everyone, allies or not," Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said. "So, please, whether you are the prime minister of India or the German chancellor, try to tone it down. Also, if you are an Iraqi insurgent, a leader of Hezbollah, a member of al-Qaeda, or a general enemy of the U.S., hush."

Bush's plea was backed by leading Republicans, who urged their constituents to comply with the president's request to "be quiet for seriously, like, two seconds."

"In these trying times for our president, we must show respect for his office, even if it means turning our car radios down, shushing our children, and turning off all fans," Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) said. "Heck, the man just needs one measly minute."

Capitol Hill Democrats, however, have criticized Bush's call for silence, with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) calling it "yet another example of Bush's inability to connect with everyday Americans, many of whom rarely, if ever, receive a moment to themselves."

"Where's their moment to think?" Pelosi said.

While Bush deemed the attempts at quiet "helpful and encouraging," he called for "literally one more second" of complete silence, saying he was "very close to getting it together and almost had it" before being interrupted by the sound of a car alarm moments ago.
Decide what you want, decide what you are willing to exchange for it. Establish your priorities and go to work. - H.L. Hunt
User avatar
Siberys
Posts: 6207
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: I live in that one place with the thing
Contact:

Post by Siberys »

I have no intelligent response other than, Good ol' onion. :D
Listen up maggots, Mr. Popo's 'bout to teach you the pecking order.
It goes you, the dirt, the worms inside of the dirt, Popo's stool, Kami, then Popo.
~Mr. Popo, Dragonball Z Abridged
User avatar
Xandax
Posts: 14151
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Xandax »

Siberys wrote:I have no intelligent response other than, Good ol' onion. :D
I don't generally like the Onion. I findt them to biased :)


But regarding the story then yes, it is "strange" or rather funny to ask the country to be "quiet" so I'm able to think.
Insert signature here.
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

*claps* The man running 1/3 of my country cannot focus with the populace making noise. That's dedication, focus and competance for you right there! Go Bush!
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
dragon wench
Posts: 19609
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: The maelstrom where chaos merges with lucidity
Contact:

Post by dragon wench »

lol! :D

staffers moved Bush family dog Barney from the Oval Office after Bush called the Scottish terrier's heavy panting "intolerable."
:speech: :eek: :speech:
Spoiler
testingtest12
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Spoiler
testingtest12
.......All those moments ... will be lost ... in time ... like tears in rain.
User avatar
Ashen
Posts: 984
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 10:16 am
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by Ashen »

I have an incredible urge to fly to DC and park in front of the WH, and then use the medicine a lot of Eastern European countries used while protesting against their ex dictators now - hit the pots and pans and blow whistles. He might actually leave the office!
And He whispered to me in the darkness as we lay together, Tell Me where to touch you so that I can drive you insane; tell Me where to touch you to give you ultimate pleasure, tell Me where to touch you so that we will truly own each other. And I kissed Him softly and whispered back, Touch my mind.
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

Terrorist don't need guns to bring the US government down. They just need kazoos. Wonderful...
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Bloodstalker
Posts: 15512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Hell if I know
Contact:

Post by Bloodstalker »

Magrus wrote:Terrorist don't need guns to bring the US government down. They just need kazoos. Wonderful...
Or heavey metal
Lord of Lurkers

Guess what? I got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

:laugh: I just find this pathetic. The man who has urged the people to be vigilant and prepare for terrorist attacks, to invade other countries to scour for terrorists has been brought to his knees by what? Background noise and panting dogs? How freaking pathetic of a message does that send to the world? :confused: Not only does he present himself as a closed-minded, incompetant idiot. He also now cannot work in anything besides absolute silence? Awesome, so the US capital must cease all noise so our government may function? HA. That, right there makes me seriously wonder what time next week we're getting bombed.
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Dowaco
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:02 pm
Contact:

Post by Dowaco »

Magrus wrote:*claps* The man running 1/3 of my country cannot focus with the populace making noise. That's dedication, focus and competance for you right there! Go Bush!

I'm just happy I am in the right 1/3.
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

Dowaco wrote:I'm just happy I am in the right 1/3.
I'd be happy to set all three parts on fire and call for a revolution to be honest. It's been due for over a century.
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Vicsun
Posts: 4547
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: liberally sprinkled in the film's opening scene
Contact:

Post by Vicsun »

Magrus wrote::laugh: I just find this pathetic. The man who has urged the people to be vigilant and prepare for terrorist attacks, to invade other countries to scour for terrorists has been brought to his knees by what? Background noise and panting dogs? How freaking pathetic of a message does that send to the world? :confused: Not only does he present himself as a closed-minded, incompetant idiot. He also now cannot work in anything besides absolute silence? Awesome, so the US capital must cease all noise so our government may function? HA. That, right there makes me seriously wonder what time next week we're getting bombed.
I think now's the right time to point out the article is fictitious :)
Vicsun, I certainly agree with your assertion that you are an unpleasant person. ~Chanak

:(
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

Vicsun wrote:I think now's the right time to point out the article is fictitious :)
In all reality, does it matter? :confused: Given his track record, is it not believable by the masses if presented as a real one? Rumors and lies have brought politicians down just as well as the truth, in fact, more often with better results. If the NY times posted that article instead of the Onion, what would happen? :confused:

Simply the fact that is was mentioned and published shows the utter contempt for the capabilities of the man running the executive branch of the U.S. government. False or not, the thoughts are still there, and moreso now that it has been published outright. Every time something is published and presented to the public in a negative manner regarding a politician it affects what others think of him. Both those who support, and oppose him.

Granted, this is a fictional article presented by a company which openly admits their articles are fictional. Just as my comments were all sarcastic ranting regarding it, *shrugs* does it matter? You all saw the effects the cartoon regarding Islam a few months ago had on people around the world. A cartoon, something purposefully made to bring amusement to others. How long before one of these articles finally creates a spark that turns into an actual true to life mess from something made as a joke? The whole world, minus what, 30-something % of Americans now thinks Bush is a horrible leader and should be taken out of office already. This constant barrage on the mans integrity, capability and intelligence in the media is just like the effects of long term erosion on a bridge or dam. Eventually, something will give and everything will go to hell.
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
Morlock
Posts: 1363
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Contact:

Post by Morlock »

Wow, a GM thread bashing Bush! How revolutionary! :rolleyes:
"Veni,Vidi,vici!"
(I came,I saw,I conquered!) Julius Ceasar
User avatar
Vicsun
Posts: 4547
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2000 12:00 pm
Location: liberally sprinkled in the film's opening scene
Contact:

Post by Vicsun »

Morlock wrote:Wow, a GM thread bashing Bush! How revolutionary! :rolleyes:
George Manson? General Motors? Giggling Monkeys? :confused:

For what it's worth, I do agree with your general sentiment.
Vicsun, I certainly agree with your assertion that you are an unpleasant person. ~Chanak

:(
User avatar
dj_venom
Posts: 4416
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:00 am
Location: The biggest island in the world
Contact:

Post by dj_venom »

Magrus wrote:In all reality, does it matter? :confused: Given his track record, is it not believable by the masses if presented as a real one? Rumors and lies have brought politicians down just as well as the truth, in fact, more often with better results. If the NY times posted that article instead of the Onion, what would happen? :confused:
They'd probably be sued for libel. :)

And I hardly think that a ficticious article posted on a satircal site will damage his reputation.. I don't think anything can damage it anymore.
In memorian: Fiona; Ravager; Lestat; Phreddie; and all of those from the 1500 incident. Lest we forget.
User avatar
Magrus
Posts: 16963
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:10 am
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by Magrus »

dj_venom wrote:They'd probably be sued for libel. :)
True, but that wasn't my point.
dj_venom wrote:And I hardly think that a ficticious article posted on a satircal site will damage his reputation.. I don't think anything can damage it anymore.
*shrugs* There are some people that still believe he is doing a good job. Yes, I know, OMG! That can't be true! Yadda yadda, but it's true. My above comments were sarcastic overreactive comments for comic effect, which, given the reaction from Vicsun, I am assuming the tone was lost with typing it up. He thought I didn't realize it was fictitious.

There are people out there that believe anything written. People that believe that WWF wrestling is real, and that the things written about space Aliens, Bush and Oprah in those fake papers and magazines are all real and truthful articles true. Keep in mind that, for the majority of the people who post here, on this website, it is a group of people above the average intelligence level compared to those who would be involved in differently oriented gaming forum. Not everyone is able to process and seperate what is truth and what is fiction. Lies can be much, much more damaging than truths if the public believes they are truth.

Assuming the public is too smart to be fooled by something so simple as an amusing article put out by a fictious newspaper could be a troublesome assumption. Remember how the American public was all for the invasion of Iraq when Bush and Co. lied about those weapons of mass destruction? How many Americans believe what is shown on Fox News is true? How many people in the USSR believed what they were being taught was real and true 60 years ago? How many people believed Hitler was doing a good deed by eradicating the Jews?

People believe what they want to believe, regardless of whether there are facts to support things. The written word has power, which is why it is illegal to print lies and pass them off as the truth. Yet, that doesn't stop the government. Political cartoons and such have a purpose, it is to demean and undercut the influence of those they are mocking in the cartoon. Such articles serve the same purpose IMO, and such things have caused trouble for politicians in the past for this country by getting through to the public.

Not that I happen to think it would be a bad thing if the public finally freaked out and took Bush and his group out of power. It would probably be a vast improvement. However, as expressed in my commentary above, making a mockery of the capability of the US government could cause people outside of this country to react as well. This country is unable to defend itself right now with the army out in force in Iraq doing their "good deeds", IE attempting to get two hands into the oil trade in the middle east. What if an article like this didn't push the US citizens into overthrowing the idiots running this country? What if it pushed those with an Anti-US sentiment into deciding they've had enough and will take matters into their own hands? If my country were invaded right now, there aren't troops enough to secure the borders or repel any kind of invasion. They're all outside of the country. The response would be to level any kind of threat to the Bush administration power base immediately.

Maybe I am just blowing this all out of proportion, or maybe I have a better grasp on the situation than other people. I am under the assumption however, that what you are seeing from US foreign policy isn't going to change for the better after 2008 and the new election is done and a new president is in power. This country is failing, and the government knows that. We have the military power to take what we want, and destroy any country that balks. What you are seeing now is a new form of colonialism I believe. A friendly face on "do as I say, and we'll help you into power if you give us what we want, or we'll keep bombing you" type action towards the world. If I am right, one of you foreigners very well may be in a country that is next in line to be occupied and hustled for natural resources the US needs to keep afloat and pay off national debt that is growing at an enormous rate.

Then again, there is another side to look at this. Is it really a sane idea to mock the head of a country that happens to have gotten away with invading a country when other countries denounced it outright, and having used lies to do so? There are a ton of idiots that happen to think this country is all well and good, that the war is super, and the economy isn't bad. They're all for America, and if you spit on America, they'll want to support the "good ol' U S of A" no matter what. The folks that want to "kill dem towelheads" and so on and so forth. People that may not think Bush is doing a great job, but will support him if outsiders mocks him, just because he's American and the others are not. Ask the Canadians and the British if they feel comfortable with the influence this government has over their lives, even when they're considered our allies. Would they feel safe if Bush declared them unfriendly and suddenly became hostile? :confused: If something set the patriotic idjits that voted Bush in off and against another country, and the Republicans or Democrats thought it would make for a sure thing to get voted into power during the next election, you better well believe they would start another war to make the people happy. If a new polition said "Wars mean jobs at factories for people here. Jobs mean money for you Americans" That is ALL that would need to be said in the current state of this American economy and they would probably agree approve it. :rolleyes:
"You can do whatever you want to me."
"Oh, so I can crate you and hide you in the warehouse at the end of Raiders?"
"So funny, kiss me funny boy!" / *Sprays mace* " I know, I know, bad for the ozone"
User avatar
dj_venom
Posts: 4416
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 7:00 am
Location: The biggest island in the world
Contact:

Post by dj_venom »

Magrus wrote:Assuming the public is too smart to be fooled by something so simple as an amusing article put out by a fictious newspaper could be a troublesome assumption.
The Onion Privacy Policy wrote:Copyright

The Onion® is a satirical newspaper published by Onion, Inc.

The Onion® uses invented names in all its stories, except in cases when public figures are being satirized. Any other use of real names is accidental and coincidental.
Additionally, most people would, rather than spreading malicious rumours about George Bush after this, write angry letters to the Onion about trivialising September 11. If this article would do anything, it would probably get him more support.

Also, you have to consider, who visits the Onion. People that know of the site, people that know if it, will know it is satire, therefore they aren't affected. Finally, with having absolutely no mention of this on the news, it would be apparent that it never actually happened.
Magrus wrote:The written word has power, which is why it is illegal to print lies and pass them off as the truth. Yet, that doesn't stop the government. Political cartoons and such have a purpose, it is to demean and undercut the influence of those they are mocking in the cartoon. Such articles serve the same purpose IMO, and such things have caused trouble for politicians in the past for this country by getting through to the public.
To an extent. You can publish lies, just so long as it is not making imputations against people which will damage their reputation, their profession, or cause them to be shunned/ridiculed etc.

Political cartoons are often used to veil defamation and lies, simply because, by virtue of being a cartoon, it is covered under the defence of fair comment. As a result, yes, they can demean and undercut the influence of people, however I highly doubt in the majority of cases, that is the meaning. It's for humour, and the people that write it just want to make a light-hearted jest. There was an interview with... can't remember the bloke's name, it'll come to me later... some Australian cartoonist, who's work had been published over in Iran in a particular anti-West cartoon. He was fired up about how his work was used to push a certain attitude, when in fact, he wrote it as fun. I am aware that people may have hidden agendas, however I highly doubt someone would get to that position to do that, and then retain it (it would become apparent eventually).
Magrus wrote:Maybe I am just blowing this all out of proportion, or maybe I have a better grasp on the situation than other people.
I think the former.
Magrus wrote:Then again, there is another side to look at this. Is it really a sane idea to mock the head of a country that happens to have gotten away with invading a country when other countries denounced it outright, and having used lies to do so?
Is it a sane idea to enjoy our freedom of speech?
Magrus wrote:Ask the Canadians and the British if they feel comfortable with the influence this government has over their lives, even when they're considered our allies. Would they feel safe if Bush declared them unfriendly and suddenly became hostile?
Bah, if he declared war on us Aussies who have helped him through, he'd get the rough end of our sticks. I tell you what, we'd fight to the last bloody man, woman and child. :)
In memorian: Fiona; Ravager; Lestat; Phreddie; and all of those from the 1500 incident. Lest we forget.
User avatar
Judaeus Apella
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:25 pm
Contact:

Post by Judaeus Apella »

Instead of writing something long and intelligently well informed, I'm just going to say this:

What a @#$*in idiot. I've never even met anyone who voted for him. :rolleyes:
User avatar
Siberys
Posts: 6207
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: I live in that one place with the thing
Contact:

Post by Siberys »

What a @#$*in idiot. I've never even met anyone who voted for him.
You probably have but just didn't go right up and ask who they voted for. And besides, while politics isn't his strong suit by far, I doubt he's a complete idiot.
Listen up maggots, Mr. Popo's 'bout to teach you the pecking order.
It goes you, the dirt, the worms inside of the dirt, Popo's stool, Kami, then Popo.
~Mr. Popo, Dragonball Z Abridged
Post Reply