Sorceror as only mage?
Sorceror as only mage?
Hi
I'm going to start a new party. and my idea was a 4 man party containing of these:
Me, Avenger
Chloe, Kensai
Kelsey, Sorcerer
Valen, Thief
Now i'm just wondering: Could I use a sorceror as my only spellcaster? Do the sorceror ever get "haste"? I could take in Edwin in my party but I like the idea of a 4 man party better than 5 man... and i dont wanna throw Kelsey out because of that irritating Edwin characer I've played with so many times...
(I know there is alot of Sorc vs Mage threads but I couldn't find any thread concerning the question of sorc as ONLY spellcaster)
I'm going to start a new party. and my idea was a 4 man party containing of these:
Me, Avenger
Chloe, Kensai
Kelsey, Sorcerer
Valen, Thief
Now i'm just wondering: Could I use a sorceror as my only spellcaster? Do the sorceror ever get "haste"? I could take in Edwin in my party but I like the idea of a 4 man party better than 5 man... and i dont wanna throw Kelsey out because of that irritating Edwin characer I've played with so many times...
(I know there is alot of Sorc vs Mage threads but I couldn't find any thread concerning the question of sorc as ONLY spellcaster)
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
It's been said before quite a lot, but you can play through the game successfully with any party, even 4 spellcasters or going solo. Substituting different party NPCs only affects the challenge and strategic thinking involved. That's all.
As for a sorceror, in some ways the game will be easier with one in your party. They will always have their full spell list available for use (barring any mishap, such as a level drain). On the other hand, they will have fewer spells to learn, so you need to make each spell choice you receive count a great deal.
Personally, I like to have one primary and one secondary magic user in the party, but that's up to you. If you go with one magic user and it's a sorc, you have to be still more careful about which spells you add to your collection. I would suggest really studying Xyx's spell recommendations. They're very much his own opinions, but there's a lot of good information, there, especially about which spells simply don't yield any real benefits.
Note: Valen and Kelsey? Are you running a happy mod? Because Valen likes to take command of the party, and the decisions she makes won't please "good" party NPCs. Just a thought. Very well done mod, however.
As for a sorceror, in some ways the game will be easier with one in your party. They will always have their full spell list available for use (barring any mishap, such as a level drain). On the other hand, they will have fewer spells to learn, so you need to make each spell choice you receive count a great deal.
Personally, I like to have one primary and one secondary magic user in the party, but that's up to you. If you go with one magic user and it's a sorc, you have to be still more careful about which spells you add to your collection. I would suggest really studying Xyx's spell recommendations. They're very much his own opinions, but there's a lot of good information, there, especially about which spells simply don't yield any real benefits.
Note: Valen and Kelsey? Are you running a happy mod? Because Valen likes to take command of the party, and the decisions she makes won't please "good" party NPCs. Just a thought. Very well done mod, however.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
You're making your party better by choosing a Sorcerer as your only mage (as long as you're familiar with the spells in BGII).
If there are any "iffy" spells (like most summons and the aformentioned haste), use a scroll.
If there are any "iffy" spells (like most summons and the aformentioned haste), use a scroll.
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives."
-- Jackie Robinson
Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu!
-- Jackie Robinson
Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu!
I agree that the sorcerer is a strong choice. Only the wildmage is stronger. (However, I would not choose the wildmage in a tactically modded game if he was my sole source of arcane power.) And remember that "iffy" spells are decided by your play style, your team, and the mods (if any) that you install. Haste is sometimes a good choice.Klorox wrote:You're making your party better by choosing a Sorcerer as your only mage (as long as you're familiar with the spells in BGII).
If there are any "iffy" spells (like most summons and the aformentioned haste), use a scroll.
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
I don't think sorcs can use scrolls--as least, they can't in my current game, though it's heavily modded.Klorox wrote:You're making your party better by choosing a Sorcerer as your only mage (as long as you're familiar with the spells in BGII).
If there are any "iffy" spells (like most summons and the aformentioned haste), use a scroll.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
No, I don't. I could be up my list, but this is really off-topic, here. Suffice to say, I deliberately tested it out with Kelsey, whom I'm using at the moment. All mage scrolls are faded, and unable to be placed in the "use" area of his inventory screen.rbeverjr wrote:Sorcerers can normally use arcane scrolls - unless maybe if they are stupid (low intelligence). I've never heard of a mod preventing them from doing so. Do you have any idea, Fable, which mod may be causing that?
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
- Crenshinibon
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:35 pm
- Contact:
In the unmodded game sorcerers CAN use scrolls, although I'd much rather sell them and use wands instead. You should have no problems with a sorcerer as you'll often find yourself using the same spells over and over, just be careful about your spell choice. Once you choose the spells, they're with you forever.
“The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially.”
My very first character, back when ToB wasn't available yet, was a sorcerer, and I've been playing with sorcerers ever since. Next to them, mages pale; Imoen's number of kills and total experience earned is always much lower than Xan's or Kelsey's.
My only problem is that the vanilla game doesn't introduce thieves, only thief/mages(Nalia, Imoen, Jan), but new NPC mods and Level1NPCs mod took care of this problem.
My only problem is that the vanilla game doesn't introduce thieves, only thief/mages(Nalia, Imoen, Jan), but new NPC mods and Level1NPCs mod took care of this problem.
[url='http://www.pocketplane.net']IWD NPC, Xan, The Sellswords, Back to Brynnlaw, Assassinations, Dungeon Crawl, Branwen, Coran, Tiax, Xan BG1 Friendship[/url]
[url='http://gibberlings3.net']BG1 NPC, Romantic Encounters[/url]
[url='http://gibberlings3.net']BG1 NPC, Romantic Encounters[/url]