Posted: Sun Mar 10, 2002 7:28 pm
I believe you, Fable. I had 92% pagan old fahrtism, but I'm a couple of years younger than you....Originally posted by fable
Yes, definitely: Neo-paganism/pagan old fahrtism.
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
I believe you, Fable. I had 92% pagan old fahrtism, but I'm a couple of years younger than you....Originally posted by fable
Yes, definitely: Neo-paganism/pagan old fahrtism.
Which is kind of what I meant about not understanding how I was supposed to answer the questions So if you believe in those things but don't think they should be part of your religion, you should select n/a? I kind of figured it that any religion that might suit (even though I already specified atheist beliefs) ought, for example, to accept abortion, so I didn't check n/a. And I didn't get how the importance ratings were supposed to work either, is it how important that particular thing is in determining your religion? Or how strongly you believe that particular thing?Originally posted by C Elegans
This is the trick: do you recall all the questions in the latter part of the test where you answer what you think about homosexuality, gender roles, abortion, divorce etc? Now, above this part of the test is the text:
"THE FOLLOWING POSITIONS SHOULD BE PART OF THE RELIGION OR BELIEF CATEGORY:"
That is why I, and probably you and Aagis too, don't come out with 100% in atheism/agnosticims. If we had chosen "not applicable" to those questions, we would have come out at atheists/agostics, but what we do by answering them is to say they should be included in a belief system.
Originally posted by Georgi
Which is kind of what I meant about not understanding how I was supposed to answer the questions So if you believe in those things but don't think they should be part of your religion, you should select n/a?
That's how I replied to, but for those latter questions it doesn't matter if we had already specified ourselves as atheists, the test still place our replies in a religious cathegory if we not check n/a.
I kind of figured it that any religion that might suit (even though I already specified atheist beliefs) ought, for example, to accept abortion, so I didn't check n/a. And I didn't get how the importance ratings were supposed to work either, is it how important that particular thing is in determining your religion? Or how strongly you believe that particular thing?
I didn't so much take sides as revise my previous options, to be honest i don't think the test covers my belief's, could you put me in Other?Originally posted by VoodooDali
Secular Humanists and Unitarian Universalists remain tied. Atheists edged out Conservative Protestants after Georgi changed camps. My fellow Liberal Quaker, Sleepy, changed teams and is now a Liberal Protestant!
Actually, yes, the Church of Christ and SBC do share a lot of values, though if you asked them, they'd say no. In 9th grade, I wrote an essay on the similarities and differences between the Church of Christ and Southern Baptists. Since my mom grew up in the Church of Christ, but me and my parents go to Southern Baptist churches, I had the resources to do this. I found that really the only differences between the two are that Church of Christ do not allow instruments in the service, believe that baptism is necessary to be saved, and that you can lose your salvation; whereas the SBC believes that you can have instruments in the service, that baptism is symbolic(a public profession of your faith), and that you cannot lose your salvation. As for everything else they believe, they're basically the same. They even, though neither will directly admit to this, both believe that they are the only denomination going to heaven. An example of this mentality: My relatives on my mom's side are Church of Christ. My Great Grandma directly told me and my parents that we're "going to hell" because we're going to Baptist churches instead of CoC churches.Originally posted by C Elegans
Do the SBC and the Church of Christ share most values, or do they emphasize different things? I must say I'm surprised to hear that King James Bible is considered the only true bible, why that particular version and not the older writings?
Well, that sounds to me like somewhere between Liberal Protestant and Agnostic, but I don't know much about Liberal Protestant.Originally posted by Mr Sleep
I don't think they have my religion in there i am more of a non-believer they don't have Liberal Cynic It is like this, i believe in a God, but i don't hold sway with the Christian God and/or any other God that i have heard of, i am not exactly one to worship anythign anyway, anyone heard of a religion that is similar?
Actually, Sleep, I felt the same way. Maybe I'll retest too. I seriously thought it would come out that I am neo-pagan or something. However, most of the questions seemed oriented to Judaeo-Christian beliefs. I tend to believe in lots of stuff all at once, even if it's contradictory.Originally posted by Mr Sleep
I didn't so much take sides as revise my previous options, to be honest i don't think the test covers my belief's, could you put me in Other?
They are definately loaded questions, i would have to answer most of them as Non Applicable and Low priority, i tend to be either cynical or apathetic towards most of their questions, and the ones i do choose seem to make me (as you say) Judaeo-Christian, I would have assumed i would come out Agnostic, i am not, but that would be consistent with how i answered my questions, perhaps we should create a test ourselves that is not biased as theirs is. I might be able to do it, we might get Xandax involved, any php scripters out there who could help?Originally posted by VoodooDali
Actually, Sleep, I felt the same way. Maybe I'll retest too. I seriously thought it would come out that I am neo-pagan or something. However, most of the questions seemed oriented to Judaeo-Christian beliefs. I tend to believe in lots of stuff all at once, even if it's contradictory.
The only problem with that is that, more than likely, though you try to be objective, you would still come out biased.Originally posted by Mr Sleep
They are definately loaded questions, i would have to answer most of them as Non Applicable and Low priority, i tend to be either cynical or apathetic towards most of their questions, and the ones i do choose seem to make me (as you say) Judaeo-Christian, I would have assumed i would come out Agnostic, i am not, but that would be consistent with how i answered my questions, perhaps we should create a test ourselves that is not biased as theirs is. I might be able to do it, we might get Xandax involved, any php scripters out there who could help?
The person doesn't have to be objective, the questions do, if we were to create some kind of GB pool we would be able to make enough options (due to the rather large cultural differences)Originally posted by Sailor Saturn
The only problem with that is that, more than likely, though you try to be objective, you would still come out biased.
lolOriginally posted by Mr Sleep
The person doesn't have to be objective, the questions do, if we were to create some kind of GB pool we would be able to make enough options (due to the rather large cultural differences)
Perhaps i am being an optimist, which kind of argues with my Cynical nature, now you wonder why these tests just don't work for me
Well I got 100% in both Atheist and Secular Humanist, so maybe I should be half in eachOriginally posted by VoodooDali
Secular Humanists and Unitarian Universalists remain tied. Atheists edged out Conservative Protestants after Georgi changed camps.
Or you could elect to be an Atheist three days a week, a Secular Humanist three others, and join a folk dancing club on the seventh.Originally posted by Georgi
Well I got 100% in both Atheist and Secular Humanist, so maybe I should be half in each