Originally posted by Georgi:
<STRONG>I have no objection to the word "folks", I just don't really think it's apt when talking about those terrorists... It seems too friendly, really. Surely "monsters" would have been more appropriate...</STRONG>
![Roll Eyes :rolleyes:](./images/smilies/)
"Folks" is not "too friendly." Too generic, maybe; but not too friendly. It is a word that can be used when talking about
anyone, from Nazis to your parents to terrorists to spies to anyone else in this world. You're obviously searching for anything that Bush does "wrong" and that in itself is a wrong thing to do in a time like this. *glares* I honestly didn't think you were the type to do this kind of thing, Georgi.
@Fas I would bet that I have a bigger vocabulary than you and I use the word folks fairly often in lots of ways. Whether or not it was
the best word to use in that sentence doesn't matter in the least. *glares*
In fact, I'll show you why it was a
better word to use than monsters, looking at it from a Public Speaking perspective.
If Bush were trying to incite the American people to war(not that it would necessarily take much), the use of the word "monsters" to describe the terrorist would be perfect. Bush, however, is
not trying to get a war to start, thus he used the word "folks" which doesn't elicit the same kinda response. The point of the sentence was that they will be caught. Using words that encourage anger will not help this country remain calm enough to handle the situation correctly.