Page 7 of 10
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:29 pm
by Scayde
[QUOTE=Tower_Master]traumatic - read:capable of starting a Third World War, even without the
Dreaded Speedo of Doom (coming soon to a Wal-Mart near you!)[/QUOTE]
Please god, tell me that he is not mass producing them 
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:33 pm
by Tower_Master
I put nothing past the evil that is large corporations...
Who knows, maybe it'll soon be available in a tasteful tangerene? Or chartreuse, even?
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:36 pm
by Scayde
[QUOTE=Tower_Master]I put nothing past the evil that is large corporations...
Who knows, maybe it'll soon be available in a tasteful tangerene? Or chartreuse, even?
[/QUOTE]
I don't think that tasteful and Weasel's speedoes belong in the same sentence
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:40 pm
by dragon wench
[QUOTE=Scayde]
I don't think that tasteful and Weasel's speedoes belong in the same sentence [/QUOTE] I don't know, rumour has it that goats and undergarments... er.. well... never mind...
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:54 pm
by Scayde
[QUOTE=dragon wench]I don't know, rumour has it that goats and undergarments... er.. well... never mind...
[/QUOTE]
LOL..those goats will eat anything
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 11:55 pm
by Tower_Master
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 12:07 am
by Scayde
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:04 pm
by dragon wench
[QUOTE=Scayde]
LOL..those goats will eat anything [/QUOTE] You know... I am certain there are laws in the Geneva Convention about eating Weasel's speedos.......... for the protection of the goats that is.....
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:02 pm
by Tower_Master
[QUOTE=dragon wench]You know... I am certain there are laws in the Geneva Convention about eating Weasel's speedos.......... for the protection of the goats that is.....
[/QUOTE]
Indeed - wouldn't that qualify as a "chemical warfare agent" or something?
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 9:17 pm
by Aegis
[QUOTE=Tower_Master]Indeed - wouldn't that qualify as a "chemical warfare agent" or something?
[/QUOTE]
It's definatly a WMD, though, that's for sure
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:29 pm
by Tower_Master
Oh yes, striking fear into the hearts of innocent kids (read: baby goats
) everywhere.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:37 pm
by Aegis
[QUOTE=Tower_Master]Oh yes, striking fear into the hearts of innocent kids (read: baby goats
) everywhere.[/QUOTE]
That should probably read 'Striking fear into the hearts of innocent
kits everywhere
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:58 am
by dragon wench
[QUOTE=Aegis]That should probably read 'Striking fear into the hearts of innocent
kits everywhere
[/QUOTE]
Not to mention togas.......
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:02 am
by Aegis
[QUOTE=dragon wench]Not to mention togas.......
[/QUOTE]
Not with with one of my 'Aegis brand Togas'! Impervious to everything! Only $19.95, complete with 'custom' fitting... Hehe...
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:41 am
by CM
....I am speechless. The amount of sexual innuendos you two can come up with is astonishing. Is nothing sacred?
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 12:41 pm
by Shai Hulud
[QUOTE=CM]
....I am speechless. The amount of sexual innuendos you two can come up with is astonishing. Is nothing sacred?
[/QUOTE]
innuendo \In`nu*en"do\, n.; pl. {Innuedoes}(?). [L., by
intimation, by hinting, gerund of innuere, innutum, to give a
nod, to intimate; pref. in- in, to + -nuere (in comp.) to
nod. See {Nutation}.]
1. An oblique hint; a remote allusion or reference, usually
derogatory to a person or thing not named; an insinuation.
[QUOTE=dragon wench]@Shai Hulud,
ROFL! But those sheep and goats look.. well dare I say.. remarkably unmolested. Are you *sure* these are the same ones that have had encounters with the dreaded Weasel and his golden speedos?[/QUOTE]
followed by...
[QUOTE=Shai Hulud]LOL...TY for the welcome and I am 100% sure the goat is notice how he can't walk.
And I'm pretty sure on the sheep too. I mean check those facial expressions. They seem a bit confused.[/QUOTE]
I think this is where it started and based on the information given I think the proper word of choice would be inference not innuendo.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 1:49 pm
by Aegis
No, Fas is right. We're full of innuendo...
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:45 pm
by dragon wench
[QUOTE=Aegis]No, Fas is right. We're full of innuendo...
[/QUOTE]
Who? Us? SYM?
Surely you jest!
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:52 pm
by CM
No not SYM. Just you evil DFs. You two are evil. I blush when you guys start posting. I mean this is worse than the way and my mates talk and as guys in an all guy atmosphere we attempt to get pretty sick.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:54 pm
by dragon wench
[QUOTE=CM]No not SYM. Just you evil DFs. You two are evil. I blush when you guys start posting. I mean this is worse than the way and my mates talk and as guys in an all guy atmosphere we attempt to get pretty sick.[/QUOTE]
Haven't you heard? Women are usually far more adept than men with double entendre, the difference is that we can still convey it delicately, and we don't need a sweaty locker room for inspiration either