GameBanshee Forums

Hang on, just want to make sure I read that correctly.

If it is population -= populationstarved
Then in Pseudo is it:
population - populationstarved or population -<-- populationstarved?

...Is Tony an accountant? *pulls out list of accountant jokes*

[QUOTE=Athena]Tony, no!! :sheesh:[/QUOTE]

Much better! :mischief:

*Begins search for Pictures Thread*

@ Rav: Touche :laugh: .

[QUOTE=dj_venom]

...Is Tony an accountant? *pulls out list of accountant jokes*[/QUOTE]

From a wannabe lawyer?

Hehehe, can't wait.

[QUOTE=dj_venom]If it is population -= populationstarved
Then in Pseudo is it:
population - populationstarved or population -<-- populationstarved?[/QUOTE]

If you were saying population - populationstarved, it would be just the same as I've just written it in Pseudo.
If you put something in front of that, say populationtotal, it would be like this:
populationtotal <-- population - populationstarved

[QUOTE=dj_venom]...Is Tony an accountant? *pulls out list of accountant jokes*[/QUOTE]

Ouch.

[QUOTE=Fiona]From a wannabe lawyer? [/QUOTE]

*Suspiciously takes sides with Fiona*

I enjoy having the smartest person in the room backing me up, unfortunately she's about as trustworthy as Chus in a locked room with a sleeping OS...

Wait DJV's a wanabe lawyer? I don't even need a list... :mischief:

*looks reproachful*

[QUOTE=Fiona]*looks reproachful*[/QUOTE]

Hmmm, maybe you can't handle the truth...

Step up! Step right up!
Accountant Vs. Lawyer! Right before yer eyes!
*ding ding*
Round 1! :laugh:

Thanks Rav, I'll start updating that now.

@Tony: Well it's a couple of years before I can start studying it, but it'll be great when I do .

*files an injunction against Tony, stating he cannot post negative arguments about lawyers until I leave the thread*

And speaking about law, did you ever get onto the Ombudsman Fiona?

"First thing we do, is kill all the lawyers"

That shakespeare was a wise man. Particularly considering I think that we could get away with it because they wouldn't be able to take us to trial... We wouldn't have adequate representation.

[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]Hmmm, maybe you can't handle the truth...[/QUOTE]

*Dresses up as jesting Pilate*

[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]"First thing we do, is kill all the lawyers"

That shakespeare was a wise man. Particularly considering I think that we could get away with it because they wouldn't be able to take us to trial... We wouldn't have adequate representation. [/QUOTE]

Aaaand he's off to a good start!

[QUOTE=DJV]*files an injunction against Tony, stating he cannot post negative arguments about lawyers until I leave the thread*[/QUOTE]

An excellent counter there!

*files a protection order against Tony*

That is intent to murder, if you come within 500 metres of me, I shall sue you :laugh: .

[And I had an edit in the post above, you may want to look at it]

That's an injunction, isn't it?

@ DJ. Waiting till I get another letter or whatever so I have something to evidence the complaint. Turns out there are several ombudsmen. Not sure yet which one is the right one, but I can find out

No, and injuction prevents something occuring, until something else has happened.

A protection order simply stops people coming within you at all.

@Fiona: Oh, okay. I guess the Ombudsman you choose depends on which branch of government is responsible.

[QUOTE=Ravager]That's an injunction, isn't it? [/QUOTE]

Possibly. Might be a restraining order or an interdict

[QUOTE=Ravager]That's an injunction, isn't it? [/QUOTE]

You'd probably know better than him...

[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]You'd probably know better than him... [/QUOTE]
Apparently not...and since when?