Ravager wrote:Well, if I'm not supposed to know why I was demoted, why was I a mod in the first place? I was helping the GB community and I committed no mistakes in the moderating duties I had, yet I receive no reason, yes that may be between me and Buck, but since he refuses to discuss it, I have no other option bar to discuss it here.
And pushing for it here will bring you excatly how closer to reasons only Buck can give?
So you do have an option, you just decide to not take it and consitantly post things which have no relevance on the current issue, for reasons I can imagine.
Your demotion was between you and Buck. Nobody else can nor should give you reasons, and you can continue to post about it here or any other forum you like, but that will not bring you closer to the answers you ask for.
Clearly that is not dificult to see.
Luis Antonio wrote:You're being rude to me, Xandax, I beg of you not to do so. I can deal with answers nicely enough, as prooven in the moderators forum, even though I can put an extra drop or two of emotion in my posts.
I demand an answer, yes, and I have every right to demand so.
<snip>
What "rights" do you have to demand answers? Especially given you have recived all the answers you can get from this source, namely the open forum.
As said above - only Buck can give you answers for your demotion. As for the other issues, they have been answered.
Luis Antonio wrote:
Anyway, material leaked from the moderator forum is not a privilege of Lestat. Rumors and quotes and pieces of text circulated the mebers and ended um in my hands loads of times before I was a moderator. People have friends, Xandax, I wonder who you sent information to. Moderators have close people, those who are in MSN and if those people are in the threat range, i'm sure they will receive warnings or recomendations - even though if it aint a quote from a big old moderator on the mod discussion forum
Before trying to question my integrity you really need to take a long hard look if you want to this debate to continue, because pesonal attacks of that nature is not something I'll stand for.
The fact that you in the past have recived information from the moderator forum does not make it right that others do.
The fact that you have recived such information does not give Lestat the validation to post it as he did.
It is ridiculous that this is kept in such a secret. Ridiculous. People care about it. Someone pointed that this policy was aproved and within minutes threads were closed, as if the moderators in charge were smiling.
Now this is where the lie aspect comes into play.
From the policy was announced until the first thread was closed a timespan of 5 hours passed.
I dont believe so, because it is our duty, but strangely enough, after two mderators who were against the policy kept discussing the matter SECRETLY IN MODERATOR FORUM, the forum owner wants to kick them both out.
Ask Buck why. He's the one who can answer it. It also had no effect on the policy or debate, because you were already outvoted by a vast majority.
Then, posts disappear.
Post always "dissapear" when they violate the forum rules.
Then moderators start to spam - because now it is funnier to spam - and participate in threads where they would never look at before.
Presumptions. Placing your own opinion of "spam" and "funnier to spam" as indicator of knowing other peoples posting habbits.
And then, moderators point me that the truth is simple: Close your eyes, there are four majestic paragraphs that resolve everything: Swallow this, Luis, swallow this.
NO. I wont. Explain the four lines above to me. I want those lines dissected. I want the truth.
The truth is very simple indeed and you have been given the answers you can get from here. What you choose to do with them is then fully your responsibility.