Lady Dragonfly wrote:If the parents comply with the law and keep the weapons under a safe lock, as they should, then "a kid" has to search for the weaponry somewhere else.
The "different way" will not be guns. Somebody has already pointed out that "a kid" armed with knives or a sword is unlikely to murder 32 people.
I agree that a bomb might be a possibility but it is not as readily available.
I pointed out to the principal all of the things that could be used as a weapon that were on me at the time. All of which were typical school supplies for students and clothing items. Anything can be used to hurt someone if you put your mind to it and have the will to do so. It didn't comfort him, but amused the psychologist. She was fond of people that thought outside of the box.
I think you might be amazed to see what kind of damage a typical #2 pencil could do to someone if used with the right amount of force and at the right angle at the right spots on a persons body. The typical student carries a few of those around daily, as required by typical teachers demands. A belt makes a good restraint, and those 5-10 lb textbooks students are forced to carry are heavy enough to knock someone out if you hit them at the right angle with them.
Ironic, no? It won't kill 30 people rapidly, but then, you might be frightened to learn how much goes on inside of a typical school that is never reported or brought up to anyone outside of the incident that happens these days. It wouldn't be too hard to believe that a person could with only school supplies mind you, incapacitate or kill a handful of people before anyone realized it. Metal detectors won't help there, nor will searching students. They're all required items for schooling.
Lady Dragonfly wrote:I agree that the gun lobby is very powerful. But I think something can be done to enhance the situation. For example, mental illness makes a would-be gun owner ineligible to purchase a gun. But currently ONLY 22 STATES submit mental health records to NICS. Virginia does supply the information, but apparently not 100%. There are plenty loopholes in the existing law.
Incorrect! Myself, I have a record that includes being deemed as dangerous when provoked and a past history of psychosis. I could, should I wish to, purchase as many guns as I wanted. So long as they are not hand-guns. Which amuses me to no end. Hand guns are easy to conceal and carry, so they are banned. Yet, the ones which a far greater range and damage capability can be gained with cold cash and nothing more than a criminal record check and a several day delay to go over the records. Even to someone who is completely insane and happens to believe everyone is really a 4 armed monster with 3 heads due to severe delusion and hallucinations. Comforting, no?