Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2001 2:14 pm
*loves a debate when people are actually debating...*
I felt like being mean. ^_~
I felt like being mean. ^_~
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
I am going to. Perhaps "bullsh!t" was a bit extreme, but you did not state them as opinions. You included it as "another fact." The fact of the origin of every story of the Bible is right there in the Bible, if you're willing to accept the Bible as true. If you're not going to accept the truth of the Bible, then why even bother reading it, ne? If you want to learn more about the truth of the Bible, then PM me.Originally posted by fable:
<STRONG>I, in turn, find your way of referring to my opinions as "bullsh!t" offensive and abusive. Feel free to write Buck, if you'd like.</STRONG>
To be more exact, the only type of "racism" really was the Jews opinions of gentiles, including the Samaritans, which they had a greater dislike of because of religious disagreements on where to worship.Originally posted by Shadow Sandrock:
<STRONG>Err... I really don't think that racial profiling existed back in 6 B.C., Fable... there WAS no white race, except for maybe the Romans and Greeks. The only real racism mentioned in the Bible was against the Samaritans. You have no background to base that opinion on.</STRONG>
@Shadow, I never about about any "white race," so you might read a little closer before criticizing.Originally posted by Shadow Sandrock:
<STRONG>Err... I really don't think that racial profiling existed back in 6 B.C., Fable... there WAS no white race, except for maybe the Romans and Greeks. The only real racism mentioned in the Bible was against the Samaritans. You have no background to base that opinion on.</STRONG>
Oops. Anyways, the Romans and Greeks were generally not Christian, though most Palestinian groups of people eventually formed Christian churches, until the persecution of Nero in AD68 (or around there somewhere). Thus there were few if any 'white Christian men' back at the timeOriginally posted by fable:
<STRONG>@Shadow, I never about about any "white race," so you might read a little closer before criticizing.You may be referring to Aegis' remark.</STRONG>
I just PM'd Buck. You could've ended this imediately by merely removing that offensive statement from your post, which is all I asked you to do.Originally posted by fable:
<STRONG>@SS, like I said, I don't want to get into this, here. I'll end up siting numerous reference works by highly respected Christian scholars; you'll end up denying they're Christian, and demanding whom I think I am to write about the opinions of Christians, anyway. We've been there; done that. Let's stop it, now. PLEASE.</STRONG>
Alright.Originally posted by T'lainya:
<STRONG>People, please take this to pms. If this thread continues in this vein I'm closing it.</STRONG>
@SS: This is by no means an attack. But, often, the veiws of a Christian, or Arab, or whatever religion you are often clouded about your own religion because of the blind faith often exhibited in those beliefs. Fable was merely speaking from the point of veiw, factually, as a non-christian (I think he's non-christian) You took that and thought it was an attack, which it was not. This is all I will say on this matter.Originally posted by Sailor Saturn:
<STRONG>Just so you know, I am still waiting for you to tell me what gives you more authority on Christianity than an actual Christian.![]()
![]()
[ 12-17-2001: Message edited by: Sailor Saturn ]</STRONG>
I'm going to reply to this in PM; but if anyone else wants to know my reply, let me know and I'll PM it to you.Originally posted by Aegis:
<STRONG>@SS: This is by no means an attack. But, often, the veiws of a Christian, or Arab, or whatever religion you are often clouded about your own religion because of the blind faith often exhibited in those beliefs. Fable was merely speaking from the point of veiw, factually, as a non-christian (I think he's non-christian) You took that and thought it was an attack, which it was not. This is all I will say on this matter.
@Ysh, and Sleep: I know continuing this should've been done in PM's, but I felt this was something everything should read, as it has occured many times.</STRONG>
I'm no expert on AD&D and mythology, but I heard Tolkien was influenced by Northern European myth and tales etc. (I watched a TV program about Tolkien and his creation last nightOriginally posted by Sailor Saturn:
<STRONG>Also, what about Gnolls and Goblins? What are their origins?
Is there any AD&D stuff/creatures/etc that originates from Eastern Mythology as opposed to Western Mythology?</STRONG>
W0ot W0ot!!!!!Originally posted by Aleldar:
<STRONG>It is a simple question to answer.
There were five guys, sitting around a table. Smoking some ass kicking weed. You see they had just come back from Holland, from the hash bash. When they got home, they decided to take all the maryjane that they bought and mix it together. They figured that mixing all the weed together, they would be able to see god.
They twisted about 5 lbs into a huge joint, man. Then smoke it, they didn't see god, but they were able to come up with all the D&D stuff, man. They also went out to every grocery store and bought all the twinkies and ding dongs they could find.
That is how D&D came about. But after reading Fable's posted explaination, I figured there were 6 guys who smoke that ass kicken weed, man.</STRONG>
Foxwomen? I remember reading about female fox spirits that possessed young women to seduce men in Japanese mythology. There's something like that in AD&D?Originally posted by T'lainya:
<STRONG>Foxwomen are Japanese IIRC</STRONG>
YepOriginally posted by Sailor Saturn:
<STRONG>Foxwomen? I remember reading about female fox spirits that possessed young women to seduce men in Japanese mythology. There's something like that in AD&D?</STRONG>
Originally posted by T'lainya:
<STRONG>YepI can't remember if they're under 2nd or 3rd edition in the lycanthrope section
</STRONG>