Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2002 7:32 pm
one ques, voodoo how did u take 6 years of latin in HS? I thought HS was only 4 years?
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
I went to private school--started in 7th grade. First year of latin, there were 35 or so people in the class. By the 3rd year, there were about 15. When I was a senior, there were only 4 of us left! It was their loss, the last couple of years of latin were the most fun--just translation. We translated the entire Aeneid, Ovid's Metamorphosus, Catullus (but not the risque poems, unfortunately), and some Horace (very difficult). Translated Cicero and Julius Caesar in earlier years.Originally posted by Vinin
one ques, voodoo how did u take 6 years of latin in HS? I thought HS was only 4 years?
Neat. Wish the public schools had offered that. Montaigne's father (Montaigne was a minor nobleman, famous diplomat and great essayist in the 16th century; his stuff reads like a modern existentialist, frequently) raised him hearing *only* Latin until he was 10 or 11, had a time when Latin was just away from its position as the central language of Western government, culture, science and thought. We, on the other hand, had to put up in high school with an English teacher who deliberately taught the language as though it were nothing but Latin prefixes and suffixes, divorced from contact with reality: dry, deadly stuff, fit more for disinterment in a morgue than speaking or reading. Is it any wonder, after going through the US Public School System, that most children see reading as equivalent in fun to a broken hip?Originally posted by VoodooDali
I went to private school--started in 7th grade. First year of latin, there were 35 or so people in the class. By the 3rd year, there were about 15. When I was a senior, there were only 4 of us left! It was their loss, the last couple of years of latin were the most fun--just translation. We translated the entire Aeneid, Ovid's Metamorphosus, Catullus (but not the risque poems, unfortunately), and some Horace (very difficult). Translated Cicero and Julius Caesar in earlier years.
Did you do the sparrow one? It's not risque as such, but it could be interpreted...interestinglyOriginally posted by VoodooDali
Catullus (but not the risque poems, unfortunately)
Yes I know that one, but the ones that were omitted from my latin classes were more like this--Originally posted by Kameleon
Did you do the sparrow one? It's not risque as such, but it could be interpreted...interestingly![]()
Yes, I really think so. It wouldn't need to be the same 1st language for everybody, people could still keep whatever native language they wished, but I think everybody should start learning a common international language as kids. I don't care what language, although I think in theory a constructed, regular language like Esperanto would be fine.Originally posted by frogus
Do you think the world would be a better place if we had a standard, international language?
Yes, it is, isn't it? Dutch is even more. It's fascinating noting the Dutch words during conversation that went out of fashion during the English Renaissance. Of course, it's hard to follow the conversation at the same time.Originally posted by The Z
I've found German to be fairly simple, as with Latin. For Latin vocab, all you need to know are English derivatives. German was very similar to English.
I think the idea behind Esperanto was for it to be a world language. Unfortunately, just about the only ones speaking it are catholic priests, so unless you have lengthy confessions to make when abroad it's pretty useless. Besides, Esperanto has been superceded by Ido, which, since noone I know (including me) knows anything about it, hardly is making any great progress in turning into a world language.Originally posted by C Elegans
... although I think in theory a constructed, regular language like Esperanto would be fine.