Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:08 pm
by Scayde
Originally posted by dragon wench
...<snip> I know I'll be taking at least some note of spelling and grammar :p <snip>


Thats it...I ain't playin' :D

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:20 pm
by dragon wench
Originally posted by Scayde
Thats it...I ain't playin' :D
lol! But I just got new buckets for the sandbox, there's even a special green one just for you :D ;) *grin*

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:34 pm
by Scayde
Originally posted by dragon wench
lol! But I just got new buckets for the sandbox, there's even a special green one just for you :D ;) *grin*


Does it have a blue shovel? :D

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 7:46 pm
by dragon wench
Originally posted by Scayde
Does it have a blue shovel? :D
Of course :D

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 1:54 am
by Gilgalen
Persephone was a Pollyanna, though she’d probably disagree. Although she might acknowledge pessimism in some potentialities. But pretty Persephone’s predisposition isn’t really of remark. Peaches were her passion, though she preferred them in the dark.

Peter ate them in daylight, imprudently unabashed. Penny was always pensive as she prudishly nibbled them from a parcel she had stashed. But neither Pete nor Penny could match Persephone’s potent cupidity. She’d polish of a dozen or more in front of all to see.

So it might possibly shock or perturb to learn Persephone’s peaches went amiss. How she pondered their absent fuzz and vanished piquant kiss. She sought them from Peter thinking he probably did the poaching. Penny played coy because she enjoyed Persephone’s coaxing.

The peaches never did present themselves, and Persephone plaintively cried. Without her preferred pungent morsels, she’d rather just have died. The moral of our parable, if one must present itself, is: Pretty Persephone could have anything, but tangy peaches were her real wealth.

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 2:00 am
by Georgi
I think somebody misunderstood the rules...

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 2:02 am
by Gilgalen
Misunderstood? Give me a rule, and I'll find a way to break it. ;)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 12:09 pm
by Georgi
Originally posted by Gilgalen
Misunderstood? Give me a rule, and I'll find a way to break it.
Well, given that your aim is obviously not to win, what exactly is the point of your entry? ;)

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:23 pm
by der Moench
Originally posted by Georgi
Well, given that your aim is obviously not to win, what exactly is the point of your entry? ;)
To entertain? To be frank, that is why SYM exists: to entertain me. Snap to it, everyone! :p

Peace. :cool:

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 9:11 am
by Gilgalen
I agree with der Moench. It clearly wasn't a serious story or a serious entry, but if it floats your boat to let me know I'm breaking the rules, set sail Georgi-boy.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 5:36 pm
by Chanak
50 lashes with a wet noodle for being in poor taste!!! Georgi is not a boy, and thread crashing is...well, it's rude. Crass. Boorish. You know, that sort of thing. :D

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:11 pm
by Aegis
Originally posted by Gilgalen
I agree with der Moench. It clearly wasn't a serious story or a serious entry, but if it floats your boat to let me know I'm breaking the rules, set sail Georgi-boy.
The correct term is Hamster Bait :D

@DM: Entertain you, eh? I can count for amusement :p

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:12 pm
by Georgi
Originally posted by Chanak
Georgi is not a boy
So glad you noticed, dear boy. :D

@Aegis don't make me come over there and sort you out! :p :D

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:14 pm
by Aegis
Originally posted by Georgi
So glad you noticed, dear boy. :D

@Aegis don't make me come over there and sort you out! :p :D
And that's bad, how? :p :o

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 7:52 am
by Gilgalen
Originally posted by Chanak
50 lashes with a wet noodle for being in poor taste!!! Georgi is not a boy, and thread crashing is...well, it's rude. Crass. Boorish. You know, that sort of thing. :D
Exactly what is thread-crashing? Is it the type of offense a jr. assistant moderator would accuse someone of?

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:50 am
by Georgi
Originally posted by Aegis
And that's bad, how?
:mad: Trust me, it would hurt... and not in a good way! :p :D

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:29 pm
by CM
Look its never good if it hurts :D

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:10 pm
by Scayde
oops..wrong window :D

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:11 pm
by CM
Now that is spam :D

Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:17 pm
by Aegis
Originally posted by Georgi
:mad: Trust me, it would hurt... and not in a good way! :p :D
Well, we could always find out for sure... :D