Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2001 7:21 pm
by The Outsider
The thing that never made any sense to me about dual-classing was the kit restrictions. They're the wrong way around.

Look at the way our education works: you start out general, and then specialize (even if it's in something else). In BG2, though, you start out specialized, then realize (oh sh*t! i don't wanna be an assassin!), at which point you become some kind of fighter-bum.

It would make more sense if it worked this way: dual-classers would have to start out as their true classes, and then the second class would almost certainly have to be a kit.

Comments?

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2001 8:11 am
by DĂșnadan
I quite agree, Outsider, that would make more sense.

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2001 8:13 am
by Hazim ibn Gorion
monk/druid
monk/sorcerer
archer/thief
undead hunter/cleric
kensai/assassin

or how about a valid dual that makes zero sense:

wizard slayer/mage :D

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2001 8:17 am
by fable
Inquisitor-->sorc
Barbarian-->sorc
Cleric-->sorc

Fun and power, two for the price of one! :D