Want To Be A Moderator?
@Buck, i would be willing to do the Shadows of Amn or the Throne of Bhaal forums, i would even mod the poison challice of SYM if given the opportunity, but as someone pointed out we are all limited to time frames, i have to work, which must take priority over my moderating, so my effectiveness would be between 6pm (uk time) onwards every night of the week. I would still be able to mod during the day, but i would be less effective.
I think anyone who became a mod would have to have a trial period, to judge their effectiveness.
I think anyone who became a mod would have to have a trial period, to judge their effectiveness.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
About moderating the SYM...
I have a reservation about one of regulars, or "spammers" to be a moderator of the SYM forum, unless the person will give up being a spammer. I suspect it will be difficult for members to take him/her words seriously, if he/she keeps spamming, and his/her words may be taken as flame instead of warning.
Also, one of moderators has already been involved in several spamming incidents in the SYM before, which did cause stir in the forum and among some members. I know the moderators are doing great job here and "hardly" abuse their power, though I cannot use the word, "never". Therefore, I believe the hardcore spammers (LOL) should not be appointed as a moderator, and I hope those incidents will never happen again.
I don't think there's any problem for him/her to be a moderator in the other forum, though, as long as he/she has self discipline.
I have a reservation about one of regulars, or "spammers" to be a moderator of the SYM forum, unless the person will give up being a spammer. I suspect it will be difficult for members to take him/her words seriously, if he/she keeps spamming, and his/her words may be taken as flame instead of warning.
Also, one of moderators has already been involved in several spamming incidents in the SYM before, which did cause stir in the forum and among some members. I know the moderators are doing great job here and "hardly" abuse their power, though I cannot use the word, "never". Therefore, I believe the hardcore spammers (LOL) should not be appointed as a moderator, and I hope those incidents will never happen again.
I don't think there's any problem for him/her to be a moderator in the other forum, though, as long as he/she has self discipline.
"Strength without wisdom falls by its own weight."
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
As ever, wise words of wisdom from Minerva
[ 08-22-2001: Message edited by: Gruntboy ]
[ 08-22-2001: Message edited by: Gruntboy ]
"Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his pants for his friends."
Enchantress is my Goddess.
Few survive in the Heart of Fury...
Gamebanshee: [url="http://www.gamebanshee.com/"]Make your gaming scream![/url]
Enchantress is my Goddess.
Few survive in the Heart of Fury...
Gamebanshee: [url="http://www.gamebanshee.com/"]Make your gaming scream![/url]
@Minerva, i agree with your points, you are as wise as ever
I probably couldn't forgo my spamming ways so i would be useless as an SYM mod I
I can not think of a single person (apart from Minerva only problem being time at GB ) who would be appropriate for the role, most (if not all) the regulars are consistent SYM posters, surely this negates their involvement as mods for SYM.
It might be owrth there not being any mods for SYM, merely us responsible posters, alerting Buck or whoever to any rules of the forum that are broken.
I probably couldn't forgo my spamming ways so i would be useless as an SYM mod I
I can not think of a single person (apart from Minerva only problem being time at GB ) who would be appropriate for the role, most (if not all) the regulars are consistent SYM posters, surely this negates their involvement as mods for SYM.
It might be owrth there not being any mods for SYM, merely us responsible posters, alerting Buck or whoever to any rules of the forum that are broken.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.
Minerva has a point, but I don't agree it's necessary for a moderator/-s of SYM to give up the spamming entirely, it depends on who it is. As long this person is succesful in keeping a distance between the "usual spamming" and the moderator role, I think the problems of mixing the roles can be avoided.
In order for other members ot clearly understand the difference, the Mod could should make it clear when he/she is posting as a Mod by obvious marks, like including the Mod title in the sig, as Flagg did, as use a more formal tone when posting as a Mod.
Personally, I think one of the most important characteristics of a Mod, is to have a good feeling for when a post is violating the forum rules or is discriminating, offending or illegal in some other way not predefined in the rules, regardless of one's own bias.
In order for other members ot clearly understand the difference, the Mod could should make it clear when he/she is posting as a Mod by obvious marks, like including the Mod title in the sig, as Flagg did, as use a more formal tone when posting as a Mod.
Personally, I think one of the most important characteristics of a Mod, is to have a good feeling for when a post is violating the forum rules or is discriminating, offending or illegal in some other way not predefined in the rules, regardless of one's own bias.
"There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance." - Hippocrates
Moderator of Planescape: Torment, Diablo I & II and Dungeon Siege forums
I understand what you mean and agree it depends on the person, but, unfortunately, this has been violated already before. That is why I objects spammers to be a moderator in the SYM.Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>In order for other members ot clearly understand the difference, the Mod could should make it clear when he/she is posting as a Mod by obvious marks, like including the Mod title in the sig, as Flagg did, as use a more formal tone when posting as a Mod.
</STRONG>
If I have any say, I suggest to move one of current moderators to the SYM, then appoint some members to the other forums. As I mentioned earlier, I'm sure Gruntboy will be a good moderator in Icewind Dale forum, and so will some others, like fable, Mr Sleep, and Weasel. They know what can be tolerated and what cannot be in GB forum, and that is an advantage for both them and other members, I think.
"Strength without wisdom falls by its own weight."
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
- fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
It's also important, while spamming, to know when to back off. I worked as a board moderator and dungeonmaster over several years for one of the major online gaming companies. You quickly learn that the fewer controversial topics you get involved in, the less chance there is of creating any perception of favoritism or bullying. Light, unobtrusive spamming is best; it takes no sides.Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>Minerva has a point, but I don't agree it's necessary for a moderator/-s of SYM to give up the spamming entirely, it depends on who it is. As long this person is succesful in keeping a distance between the "usual spamming" and the moderator role, I think the problems of mixing the roles can be avoided.
In order for other members ot clearly understand the difference, the Mod could should make it clear when he/she is posting as a Mod by obvious marks, like including the Mod title in the sig, as Flagg did, as use a more formal tone when posting as a Mod.
Personally, I think one of the most important characteristics of a Mod, is to have a good feeling for when a post is violating the forum rules or is discriminating, offending or illegal in some other way not predefined in the rules, regardless of one's own bias.</STRONG>
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
- ThorinOakensfield
- Posts: 2523
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location: Heaven
- Contact:
I'd like to help here.....i check the board everyday and i'm mainly interested in the BGII area....so if you need help for this area and think i'm ok for it, let me know....
Edwin, mighty founder of the Council of Mages; Co-founder of the Shadow Mages
Sorcery and Shadow together as one, the arcane and the dark united. Through our knowledge and skill none can stand against us. We are as one, infallible and invincible. The Shadow Mages.
Sorcery and Shadow together as one, the arcane and the dark united. Through our knowledge and skill none can stand against us. We are as one, infallible and invincible. The Shadow Mages.
- Gwalchmai
- Posts: 6252
- Joined: Wed May 09, 2001 11:00 am
- Location: This Quintessence of Dust
- Contact:
I would like to voice my agreement with C Elegans and Fable on this subject. Past behavior as a 'spammer' should not necessarily disqualify one as a moderator. In fact, the more prolific 'spammers' would probably have a better sense of what behavior is permissible. However, if one were to assume the mantle of moderator, one's spamming activities would have to be clearly differentiated, and probably curtailed somewhat.Originally posted by fable:
<STRONG>It's also important, while spamming, to know when to back off. I worked as a board moderator and dungeonmaster over several years for one of the major online gaming companies. You quickly learn that the fewer controversial topics you get involved in, the less chance there is of creating any perception of favoritism or bullying. Light, unobtrusive spamming is best; it takes no sides. </STRONG>
The difficult thing about being a moderator would be reconciling one's own tolerances with the tolerances established by the forum rules and past postings.
That there; exactly the kinda diversion we coulda used.
KillerKid & Alexander Denethorn:
I don't think whether you registered in this month or six months ago is not important to be a moderator, and I believe Buck will not choose his moderators purely the basis of how long he/she has been a member of GB (or, how many posts he/she has).
However, I think it is not suitable for underaged school teenagers to be a moderator (I don't know how old you are, so don't take this as directed at you, please). Part of moderators job is to monitor materials and language used in the forum, and edit/delete if it is not suitable in the forum. In this case, the minor should not see some of them to monitor in the first place. Also, the good judgement comes with experience and (dare I say) age, which are something teenagers can't have enough yet.
I don't think whether you registered in this month or six months ago is not important to be a moderator, and I believe Buck will not choose his moderators purely the basis of how long he/she has been a member of GB (or, how many posts he/she has).
However, I think it is not suitable for underaged school teenagers to be a moderator (I don't know how old you are, so don't take this as directed at you, please). Part of moderators job is to monitor materials and language used in the forum, and edit/delete if it is not suitable in the forum. In this case, the minor should not see some of them to monitor in the first place. Also, the good judgement comes with experience and (dare I say) age, which are something teenagers can't have enough yet.
"Strength without wisdom falls by its own weight."
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
A word to the wise is sufficient
Minerva (Semi-retired SYMer)
@Minerva: Thank so kindly for that dear. I happen to be 16, yet keep up with everyone here in terms of the rules, and awareness, and even Fables conversations. I don't think that a generalized statment was the right way to put it. Yes, I do agree that a lot of teenagers are not yet ready (I won't say suitable, because they may be in the future) because they have to gain some more maturity. But that's not all the people. For instance, Gaxx is younger than me, but he shows great responsibility and awareness. It's all just a matter of what the people are all like.
I have to agree. The best thing about Flagg and The Deacon was they could separate the difference between spam and trash.Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>
Personally, I think one of the most important characteristics of a Mod, is to have a good feeling for when a post is violating the forum rules or is discriminating, offending or illegal in some other way not predefined in the rules, regardless of one's own bias.</STRONG>
Both of them are from Europe, Buck is from N. America. To cover SYM I believe someone from N./S. America or Asia needs to be installed.
"Vile and evil, yes. But, That's Weasel" From BS's book, MD 20/20: Fine Wines of Rocky Flop.
@Weasel Flagg and Deke are both good at keeping their serious posting and spamming in seperate posts but i do not think this is cultural, and with the current society i do not think that having a certain nationality makes any difference.
I'd have to get drunk every night and talk about virility...And those Pink elephants I'd see.