Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2001 1:26 pm
by humanflyz
I think in terms of pure Roleplaying BG1 is better than BG2. In terms of technicality, BG2 is better. I think Bioware really wanted the game to be easy but long. For example, in BG1, you have to spent counteless hours exploring forest lands to get side quests and such. In BG2, everything is faster, but bigger. It is more dense than BG1.
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2001 2:09 pm
by Kheruldin
Maybe you are right, but in bg1 where is so many maps where you couldnt do anything and that was kinda boring. And the side quest in bg1 isnt such more than in the second. I think it more to do in bg2. But i dont remember the first one so much anylonger...
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2001 5:38 pm
by Bishibosh
to Kheruldin.....
if you are going to take any lawful good char, take keldorn, he is a lot better then mazzy, she's ok because she has hast and strength as special abilities, but it gets annoying having to spnd time using them whenever you enter a battle. Anyways, Keldorn with Cromsyre ROCKS
The only good thing about mazzy is that some people will recognize her and give you stuff (like the barkeep in the Five Flagons gives you boots of speed)
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2001 3:21 am
by Kheruldin
Thanks Bishibosh, i shall consider that. Keldorn is really good and its the only person who can use the sword you get after you killed Firkraag. And he can cast True sight with a really short notice which is extremly good. But Mazzy have i never had as i said so it would be cool to try her. I can have her until i got bots of speed then if i get some as you say...