Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:54 pm
I knew a girl whose last name was Boling. She was gonna marry a Ball and almost kept her last name until someone told her she would from then on be a Boling-Ball 
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
Don't know that this is still the case, but in many cultures that has been a standard approach to naming children, rather than an attempt to make parents look learned. For example, the ante bellum South was filled with people named Junius Brutus, Augustus, Vitella, etc. I suppose it went hand in hand with the idea they had that the South would restore dignity and letters to the US. (HL Mencken had a field day with this idea back in the 1930s when he wrote a celebrated essay entitled "The Sahara of the Bozart.")Gilliatt wrote:What I don't like is people who name their children on legendary or novel characters, like Achilles or Apollo, because they want to show others that they have some "kulture". (Victor Hugo made fun of that in Les Misérables with the Thénardiers.)
When I was teaching, I had in class, brother and sister named Strider and Galadrial,Gilliatt wrote:What I don't like is people who name their children on legendary or novel characters, like Achilles or Apollo, because they want to show others that they have some "kulture". (Victor Hugo made fun of that in Les Misérables with the Thénardiers.) I am pretty sure there are some Bilbos, Terminators, and D'Artagnans in the world.
This just reminded me of someone I heard today who thought Latin was the official language of the Latin Americans. :laugh:fable wrote:For example, the ante bellum South was filled with people named Junius Brutus, Augustus, Vitella, etc.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but that name has probably been common in your country for centuries, so that would make it a different thing from what I talked about.Achilles is not uncommon in my country (Greece), I know two guys with that name (but with the greek pronounciation) and they don't have any problem.
I know a guy who named his son Elric, and when I told him about Micheal Moorcock, he had no idea who the guy was and had never heard of Elric the Necromancer... but I don't think that was the case with the parents of Strider and Galadriel.When I was teaching, I had in class, brother and sister named Strider and Galadrial, and another family, both boys and girls named Brooke, Berry, Meadow, Sunshine, Eagle and Glade, and yes their parents were what you would call old hippies.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:Gilliatt wrote:This just reminded me of someone I heard today who thought Latin was the official language of the Latin Americans. :laugh:
I'm not sure if it was common throughout all the centuries of my country's history. And a lot of ancient greek names are not in use in modern Greece.Gilliatt wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but that name has probably been common in your country for centuries, so that would make it a different thing from what I talked about.
Yep, it truly is, and they did that with full knowledge. I don't remember her sister's name, though...dragon wench wrote:@Andurbal,
yes, that is indeed true... But, there's truly something disturbing about naming your child after a hotel...
Check in...check out...dragon wench wrote:Think of the possible implications....![]()
Actually, some studies indicate that people tend to grow into the societal image of the name they are given. Berthas tend to be trucks, as it were. However, the societal implications of a name change with time, so while at this time a name like 'Cedric' might create an oily pouf, and some other time, it might have created a sophisticated gentleman.jopperm2 wrote:Have you ever noticed how people tend to fit their names? Kind of weird huh? Some cultures would say that the name shapes the person. I'm not sure that's precisely it, but people seem to fit their name.
I used to hate my name -- Josh, for those who don't know it -- but not any more.
I knew a Dusty Rhodes, she went to elementary school with me. BlueSky reminded me of that.
That is a very good point. Bertha is a good example of that, and the name in German means bright. People may also hate their name as a kid, but grow to like it when they get older. I never liked my first name "Kathleen" because all the Kathys in my grade at school were Katherines and I was the only Kathleen. But as an adult, I like it because it is a little more unique (although Katherine and all it's variations--Kate, Kathleen, Kathy Cathy ect...are still pretty common at least in the US)Jhereg wrote: However, the societal implications of a name change with time, so while at this time a name like 'Cedric' might create an oily pouf, and some other time, it might have created a sophisticated gentleman.
Excellent point. This gets into an area of potential interest, namely why do names become more popular or less so over a lengthy time in a given culture? It's easier to determine the rises to fame. Dwight, for example, though in my opinion a terrible name, suddenly experienced a brief burst of popularity in the 1940s and 1950s, thanks to the national US prominence of General, later President Dwight David Eisenhower. But what makes a name fall from favor? That's much more difficult to figure.Jhereg wrote:Actually, some studies indicate that people tend to grow into the societal image of the name they are given. Berthas tend to be trucks, as it were. However, the societal implications of a name change with time, so while at this time a name like 'Cedric' might create an oily pouf, and some other time, it might have created a sophisticated gentleman.
True, Kathycf. My parents named me after a dead great-grandmother and a dead great-uncle. That was customary in Ukrainian culture, and her parents were from the Ukraine: honor the dead by giving their names (or forms of their names) to the living. Other cultures prefer to pass on names of the living to the newborn, so that the name itself becomes a continuing family legacy. Though I've never liked the idea of giving a child an exact copy of a parent's name, so that "Fred II" has a son, "Fred III." That seems self-indulgent, as well as saddling the kid with all sorts of potential conflicts.It seems to me that parents used to name their children to honor a relative, or a saint. They named them something that had meaning, and now they name them things like "Apple" which only seems to honor the parent's ego.
Agreed. I think some parents do it to continue a family tradition, but it does certainly smack of egotism. I think there are a lot of people who need to consider their children as individuals, not as some extension of themselves and name them accordingly.fable wrote:Though I've never liked the idea of giving a child an exact copy of a parent's name, so that "Fred II" has a son, "Fred III." That seems self-indulgent, as well as saddling the kid with all sorts of potential conflicts.