Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2001 9:28 am
Complete Agreeance with you there, Veh!
The Internet's authoritative role-playing game forum.
https://gamebanshee.com/forums/
I remember a girl I used to know who turned down a lovely (but not very attractive) man because she didn't want 'ugly' kids. Such arrogance! and such presumption!Posted by C E -
Of course there are people around who reduce others to merely sex objects, but is it any better to be reduced to an income provider or a status measurement? I think men and women at group level reduce each other equally much, the channels/expression just differ depending on gender roles in the specific time and culture
You little dark horse!Originally posted by Aegis:
<STRONG>I think thats a horrible reason not to go out with someone. If Im asked, I always go on at least one date, to see how they are. Than, I think about if I want a relationship or not.</STRONG>
Some things are better left to the mysteries of time.Originally posted by Aegis:
<STRONG>Say what, Sleep? I'm not following you (Whether thats good thing or not...)
You wanna explain the Dark horse thing?
</STRONG>
Originally posted by C Elegans:
<STRONG>This might sound strange, but I actually don't mind strangers looking at me as if I were a piece of meat, since I regard myself as being a among other things[b/], also a piece of meat. (I think of Björk's "Bachelorette", the first line is "I'm a fountain of blood/in the shape of a girl").
I view every person including myself, as having physical attributes as well as emotional, intellectual and personality attritbutes. To a person who does not know me and has never spoken to me, I am of course merely my looks, since he knows nothing else. So I don't find it more degrading to be seen as merely a sexual, physical woman-shaped piece of tissue, than to be seen as an abstract, intellectual production unit only. I want all people I learn to know to consider all the different modalities in me, that a human being consists of![]()
I look at men, maybe not the "elevator-style"gaze Garcia describes, but I certainly look at their face, body, posture, coordination, movement style etc. My lady friends describe similar behaviour patterns, you automathically evalute a man's attractiveness both sexually/physically and personality-wise.
Of course there are people around who reduce others to merely sex objects, but is it any better to be reduced to an income provider or a status measurement? I think men and women at group level reduce each other equally much, the channels/expression just differ depending on gender roles in the specific time and culture.</STRONG>