Page 1588 of 1668

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:00 pm
by Lestat
I agree with you Fiona, it creates a competitive environment in which spam thrives better. Otherwise you get a monopoly that starts slacking.


YES YES YES! :D

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:01 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]True, he'd probably relish the chance: it'd be one less irreverent spammer ceaselessly trying to avoid the profanity filter. :D [/QUOTE]
Profanity filter?...is that back on now......a few days back it wasnt.....Im surprised no one took advantage of that....oh wait we did:devil:

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:03 pm
by Fiona
[QUOTE=Lestat]I agree with you Fiona, it creates a competitive environment in which spam thrives better. Otherwise you get a monopoly that starts slacking.


YES YES YES! :D [/QUOTE]

Towards a heuristic theory of free market economics in a spam environment :p

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:04 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=Lestat]I agree with you Fiona, it creates a competitive environment in which spam thrives better. Otherwise you get a monopoly that starts slacking.[/QUOTE]
Yes....I suppose so.....too bad that competitor was killed off so long ago.....we need to motivate the Heathen citizens to spam more and give the Sf competition again.......like the good ol' days :( :cool:

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:04 pm
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=Lestat]I agree with you Fiona, it creates a competitive environment in which spam thrives better. Otherwise you get a monopoly that starts slacking.


YES YES YES! :D [/QUOTE]

Seriously? The SF may have initially been so successful because it was a break from the HC, but do you honestly think it's the "competition" that makes the spam 'better'? I agree that I'd rather there were two such threads, but only because it gives the spammer more choice: despite the fact both are mostly examples of nonsensical posting they do have different styles. The thread regulars are different as well, but I don't think anyone spams here just to spite the other thread (ignore what slade and I just posted, it was a joke :) ).

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:06 pm
by Magrus
[QUOTE=Fiona]I like having both. The spam goes better with two threads,sometimes[/QUOTE]

The wonderful lady is correct. :p Besides, I miss the citadel bar fights. :mischief:

The SF was so successfuly becuase I was out of booze, and Rav promised me unlimited booze to boost the traffic here. I should boycott the SF and start my own pub!

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:08 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]Seriously? The SF may have initially been so successful because it was a break from the HC, but do you honestly think it's the "competition" that makes the spam 'better'? I agree that I'd rather there were two such threads, but only because it gives the spammer more choice: despite the fact both are mostly examples of nonsensical posting they do have different styles. The thread regulars are different as well, but I don't think anyone spams here just to spite the other thread (ignore what slade and I just posted, it was a joke :) ).[/QUOTE]

Exactly ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:18 pm
by Ravager
[QUOTE=Magrus]The SF was so successfuly becuase I was out of booze, and Rav promised me unlimited booze to boost the traffic here. I should boycott the SF and start my own pub![/QUOTE]

What would happen if I boycotted that thread? :devil:
Oh, I'd better admit it: Yes, you helped in establishing the SF. Thanks Mag. :D

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:19 pm
by Athena
[Indent]Profanity Filter![/indent]

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:20 pm
by TonyMontana1638
[QUOTE=Athena][Indent]Profanity Filter![/indent][/QUOTE]

My God the lady knows how to make an entrance... :eek: :D

@ Rav: We'd all slowly shrivel up and die, so be responsible and sustain us for at least a couple more years :) .

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:22 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]My God the lady knows how to make an entrance... :eek: :D [/QUOTE]


*stares at avatar* yes she does :o

Ill be back going for some lunch ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:26 pm
by Ravager
[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]@ Rav: We'd all slowly shrivel up and die, so be responsible and sustain us for at least a couple more years :) .[/QUOTE]

Heh. I'll try.
Though for starters I won't be around as late next week and eventually I'll be in some internship both cutting down on my hours here a bit. :(

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:28 pm
by Fiona
Bye Slade

@Rav :(

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:31 pm
by TonyMontana1638
C ya slade! ;)

Dammit Rav :mad: , you need to name a successor then and it'll be that person's duty to keep this thread, and all its inhabitants, alive...

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:31 pm
by Ravager
I wouldn't think it would be too much, though I'm going to have to rein in my early morning departures if I have to get up around 7am every morning. :p
The internship wouldn't be until summertime at the earliest.
I'll still have to organise applications etc. anyway.

LOL! A successor? But that'd be as good as me admitting I'm not unique. :laugh: ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:06 pm
by slade
God, our spam is dying......*resisatates(sp) SF* :mad: ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:07 pm
by Ravager
Yeah, darn people abandoning us so they can get lunch. Tsk tsk. :D ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:09 pm
by Magrus
[QUOTE=TonyMontana1638]My God the lady knows how to make an entrance... :eek: :D .[/QUOTE]

You should hear her sing. ;)

[QUOTE=Ravager]What would happen if I boycotted that thread?
Oh, I'd better admit it: Yes, you helped in establishing the SF. Thanks Mag. [/QUOTE]

Heh, I dunno. And your welcome. :D

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:12 pm
by Athena
but it was just a Random Spamming! ;)

Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:14 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=Ravager]Yeah, darn people abandoning us so they can get lunch. Tsk tsk. :D ;) [/QUOTE]
well if I could live off of spam I would...but the way its been dying lately I might starve to death :mad: :p :laugh: