The HBI - Heathen Bureau of Investigation

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:39 pm

I think we should bring MS to court
like this

takes out a search warrant to investigate the SF

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:40 pm

[QUOTE=ik911]I shall speak on behalf of the aliens, for they could not attend this case. I tried contacting them, but got little response.

On behalf of the alien population, I demand that he returns the probe that he stole and concieved in his 'rectal cavity' and pays the court a fine of 1,000 Tequilas out of his own pocket for smuggling intergalactical material and another 1,000 beers to the aliens for damagecompensation, OR 40 hours of dancing-naked-in-public.[/QUOTE]
Score one for the defense! naked dancing? rav? ewwwwwwwwwwwww..............
Ik I need an attorney, imnot too far down the docket!

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:42 pm

[QUOTE=slade]I think we should bring MS to court
like this

[/QUOTE]

Not only MS, I heard some familiar voices. And signs a familiar demonic rabbit was involved. Perhaps said rabbit is in charage of UK MSN operations...:speech:

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:44 pm

[QUOTE=Phreddie]Score one for the defense! [/QUOTE]

I think not - see above. Although I am happy to await a ruling from Luis or DW. of course

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:47 pm

I found some disturbing photos in the SF as I was hacking into the security cameras I found this of Phreddie in the lab

ik911 · Post by **ik911** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:48 pm

Well, ofcourse, I know nothing about the whole case, but if Ravager is indeed in possesion of an alien anal probe, he's in big trouble, okay?

Luis Antonio · Post by **Luis Antonio** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:49 pm

I agree. We must investigate on that. Anal probes are the worst - I can see poor Ravvie with a 10 meters diameter satelite dish sending signals to the stars.

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:50 pm

That's good IK. I think you come fresher to a trial if you don't research the case against your client. More spontaneous and therefore more persuasive. It's the way to go

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:50 pm

Well, I'm not in possession of any anal probes, alien or otherwise. Tsk, how could you believe this slander ikky?

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:54 pm

*takes out a search warrant for ravager*
Well, ravager.. its legal... so... we can do this the easy way... or the hard way.

ik911 · Post by **ik911** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:55 pm

[QUOTE=slade]I found some disturbing photos in the SF as I was hacking into the security cameras I found this of Phreddie in the lab[/QUOTE]
That is not my client, and I must request you refrain from using the accused's name for the protection of privacy of mister P.

Why is that not my client?
As you can see, the person on the photo wears a white lab-coat, while the defendant does not possess such an attire. Furthermore, at the time of that photograph, my client had a clear alibi: he was in the toilet delivering a number 2. *cough*

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:57 pm

He had no witnesses (I hope

) thus it isn't a clear alibi.

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 4:57 pm

[QUOTE=ik911]That is not my client, and I must request you refrain from using the accused's name for the protection of privacy of mister P.

Why is that not my client?
As you can see, the person on the photo wears a white lab-coat, while the defendant does not possess such an attire. Furthermore, at the time of that photograph, my client had a clear alibi: he was in the toilet delivering a number 2. *cough*[/QUOTE]

That's good IK. I concur, that is not your client, Phreddie. It is his co-accused Hill. Are you acting for him too? You might be well advised to tell your client to be quiet. We all have clients like that and they spoil the best of cases

Luis Antonio · Post by **Luis Antonio** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:00 pm

Number two!!! hahahaha...

erm...

What is this toilet thing? We're investigating, not cleaning sewers.

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:00 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]He had no witnesses (I hope

) thus it isn't a clear alibi.[/QUOTE]
i had a witness... you!
I was acting upon my search warrant to look for probes in your cavaties... you will be glad to know none were found, and i do believe that you are now free to go me lad... if you need a follow up visit dont bother to come a knocking... jsut walk right in!

ik911 · Post by **ik911** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:02 pm

[QUOTE=Ravager]He had no witnesses (I hope

) thus it isn't a clear alibi.[/QUOTE]
Well, the fact that there were no witnesses further proves that the client must've been in some secluded, private space, the toilet being the most obvious location in a populated laboratory, as seen on the picture.

I can also step up for Mister H., if he wants.

slade · Post by **slade** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:04 pm

[QUOTE=Luis Antonio]What is this toilet thing? We're investigating, not cleaning sewers.[/QUOTE]
Thats right if you want something cleaned Magrus will clean it..for a hefty price ofcourse

You client has no alibi...second of all your putting words into your clients mouth since he didnt say any of that before, why is he with holding evidence...can he prove of this alibi

Ravager · Post by **Ravager** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:04 pm

ik911 wrote:Well, the fact that there were no witnesses further proves that the client must've been in some secluded, private space, the toilet being the most obvious location in a populated laboratory, as seen on the picture.

Of course it doesn't. It means he could have been anywhere, without anyone knowing! The SF isn't that well patrolled yet...

i had a witness... you!
I was acting upon my search warrant to look for probes in your cavaties... you will be glad to know none were found, and i do believe that you are now free to go me lad... if you need a follow up visit dont bother to come a knocking... jsut walk right in!

That task wasn't your responsibility either nor do I remember it happening...

Fiona · Post by **Fiona** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:05 pm

[QUOTE=ik911]Well, the fact that there were no witnesses further proves that the client must've been in some secluded, private space, the toilet being the most obvious location in a populated laboratory, as seen on the picture.
[/QUOTE]

Good again. If you could only get your client under control you might have a chance. Unfortunately he is undermining you at every turn. Some lawyers would withdraw from such a case, but I see you're made of sterner, more principled stuff

Phreddie · Post by **Phreddie** » Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:06 pm

[QUOTE=slade]Thats right if you want something cleaned Magrus will clean it..for a hefty price ofcourse

You client has no alibi...second of all your putting words into your clients mouth since he didnt say any of that before, why is he with holding evidence...can he prove of this alibi[/QUOTE]
Check m post previous to that of my misinformed councilors, i have a witness and some pretty damning evidence, damning o the case against ravager.