The case for the defence of a Tavern - Mild Spam

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:51 pm

Feel free, and I will show those shots of you at Ubik's slumber party

I have eyes everywhere.

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:51 pm

Originally posted by Nippy

Do you want me to show those shots of you, Buzz and Ned after a night of shine?

Hmmmm.... written proof of a blackmail attempt. I believe the feds call this "RACKETEERING"

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:55 pm

Uh, Nippy, you're in some of those pictures. Why are you pulling a Judas? You were in charge of security of a high profile swanky online tavern. You got free shine, you got to listen to GWAR every night.

This is the payback. You side with a group of power hungry mongrels who only decide what lives and dies in the electronic world for the sake of slightly quicker download times. This decision to pull the plug might not even speed things up. Ah well, Nippy, do what you must. We see where your loyalties lie.

Just make sure if you pull the plug on the tavern you get Buck to add a new 'Taverns' forum because we'll be opening a tavern on every street corner and ain't no amount of bandwidth is going to suffice for all the virtual drinks we'll be swilling.

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:56 pm

BS,

Leave those photos out of it. We don't want GB closed down altogether.

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 1:57 pm

Why Nippy.....WHY??????

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:01 pm

Perhaps he is being offered something in return for his testimony?

Immunity from prosecution? Perhaps a bribe? **shudders** Maybe they will make Nippy a mod????

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:08 pm

McBane,

Who cares if he shows those photos. Hell, all of SYM has seen BS and I after a night of shine, we're here every morning just counting the minutes hoping the hallucinations stop before we have to punch in. Nippy doesn't have anything shocking to show although I am alarmed BS has photos of a virtual slumber party. That could spell trouble and instantly discredit any and all participants.

Discliamer: Ned's electric shine is 'all natural' and does not possess any substances restricted by the FDA, DEA, and/or East L.A. as well.

Nippy · Post by **Nippy** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:09 pm

Originally posted by McBane
Perhaps he is being offered something in return for his testimony?

Immunity from prosecution? Perhaps a bribe? **shudders** Maybe they will make Nippy a mod????

Muwahahahahahahaha

We shall see, we shall see...

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:10 pm

My vengence shall come in the hour you least expect it Nippy.

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:11 pm

Nippy's bluffing. It really sucks when your trying to convince the table you're holding four of a kind when the mirror over your left shoulder shows 3,5,9,J,K.

And there ain't no wyldkaards.

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:13 pm

BS,

Even though I'm not your attorney, I'd advise you to retract that last statement. We are sort of in court. Besides, you don't need to concern yourself with such things. It's being dealt with.

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:14 pm

Originally posted by Ned Flanders
Nippy's bluffing. It really sucks when your trying to convince the table you're holding four of a kind when the mirror over your left shoulder shows 3,5,9,J,K.

And there ain't no wyldkaards.

LMAO

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:15 pm

Originally posted by Ned Flanders
BS,

Even though I'm not your attorney, I'd advise you to retract that last statement. We are sort of in court. Besides, you don't need to concern yourself with such things. It's being dealt with.

I am so proud of you!

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:16 pm

thanks man, I'm trying to learn. It may be a joint effort to save the tavern.

Bloodstalker · Post by **Bloodstalker** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:16 pm

Good advice Ned, I hereby retract the above statement.

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:17 pm

There are no better cases than those that require a JOINT defense!

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:19 pm

Good thinkin' BS, leave the muscle to other people right now. You're in the spotlight now, you gotta ride this and some of us like McBane and myself are hanging onto the coattails. What do think of my idea of your taverns on every street corner.

Ned Flanders · Post by **Ned Flanders** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:20 pm

by MickeyB
There are no better cases than those that require a JOINT defense!

Agreed!!!

McBane · Post by **McBane** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:23 pm

Luckily for us, I have done extensive research in this field. We should be in good shape

T'lainya · Post by **T'lainya** » Mon Feb 25, 2002 2:26 pm

Originally posted by Bloodstalker
@T.....I didn't know you were the judge!!!

By the way, who is prosecuting? if no one can be found, I make a motion for the case to be thrown out, as the defense cannot defend when there is no one to defend against.

OVERRULED
I'm co-judge

Originally posted by McBane
OBJECTION

OVERRULED