Page 3 of 3
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 3:40 am
by Rob-hin
I think so.
A monk is very magic resistant and a decent fighter.
Plus you can buy some very cool stuff for a monk since he doesn't need armor or weapons. You can put that money in some cool rings or whatnot.
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 3:45 am
by Pepsimax_x5
Does a monk get strength bonuses to his fist attacks? 1d20+4 doesnt compare with a fighters damage in TOB.
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:13 am
by Raumoheru
with the spell resistance and the speed boosts a monk is very good to solo wth. most mages become as pathetic as goblins with a high level monk
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:33 am
by Rob-hin
Well, monks do little damage, that's true.
But they are very hard to hit (magic or melee/ranged) so they dodge all attacks and kill you softly.
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:54 am
by Raumoheru
1d20 isnt little damage
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:36 am
by Thrain
if you can protect the monk in the early levels when he/her is at their weakest (the hit'n'run sling strategy comes to mind), the monk becomes quite easy to solo with. by the end of chapter 2 you should have enough magic resistance to take on most mages (although you wont be able to do kangaxx until your fists hit +4)
the gauntlets of crushing, kangaxx's ring, cloak of mirroring (or cloak of the sewers for regeneration) make the monk insanely powerful.
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:34 am
by Grandpa
That's what I thought. One word=Daystar. DOOOOOOOOOM!