Page 23 of 39

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:33 pm
by Athena
Phreddie

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:33 pm
by Fiona
*weary sigh* You can't pass as an ingenu, Hill. Answer the charges

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:35 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=Athena]Phreddie[/QUOTE]
I need Hill to answer that or it wont be usable in court ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:37 pm
by Athena
He has the right to a defense attourney :p (adding Chus to the list of possible culprits)

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:39 pm
by Hill-Shatar
Go Athena.

Well, I would not know there names, although I know that Chus and slade were planning something nefarious.

Fiona, the charges are invalid. If Luis were sane he would get this thread closed. :p

Anyways, whats this about offspring? :confused:

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:40 pm
by Fiona
Exclamation Warning for those who want to venture into the "SF"
For those who were wondering what Fiona's post is about, I reproduce the secret message I was able to insert in the Spam factory.
[GOMEZ MODE]I've got it now. It is all an elaborate hoax. This place, the SF, was set up by Chus, who in reality is Bill Gates' even eviler twin, to capture Ravager, the smartly designed & friendly computerprogram that can act like a real human being. Hence why Rav spends almost his whole life in SF. Then Chus cunningly trapped Hill into believing that he was interested in his cancer research, while secretly combining this cancer knowledge with what he could decypher from Ravager to produce a pale but dangerous rip-off of Ravager, named Phreddie. He can't avoid gloating about it and that's why he keeps calling Phreddie his & hill's 'love-child' (see post 93 in the genealogy). It's all clear to me now. OMG, RUN! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE! FLEE THE FACTORY! [/GOMEZ MODE]

For the nth time today. I am posting this, Hill, because I do not want there to be any suggestion that the procedure is not fair.

@ Athena. You are volunteering as the defence for Hill? And you have accepted Phreddie as an accomplice? Slade will need to rule on this in Luis absence.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:44 pm
by ch85us2001
I assure you that Im most trust worthy!
you know my RL name is chance

CHANCEllor Chustistine :laugh:

Nefarious?
Insidious?
Geeky?
Vile?
Yes, but thats weaseI mean Chu! :D

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:49 pm
by Phreddie
[QUOTE=Fiona]Exclamation Warning for those who want to venture into the "SF"
For those who were wondering what Fiona's post is about, I reproduce the secret message I was able to insert in the Spam factory.
[GOMEZ MODE]I've got it now. It is all an elaborate hoax. This place, the SF, was set up by Chus, who in reality is Bill Gates' even eviler twin, to capture Ravager, the smartly designed & friendly computerprogram that can act like a real human being. Hence why Rav spends almost his whole life in SF. Then Chus cunningly trapped Hill into believing that he was interested in his cancer research, while secretly combining this cancer knowledge with what he could decypher from Ravager to produce a pale but dangerous rip-off of Ravager, named Phreddie. He can't avoid gloating about it and that's why he keeps calling Phreddie his & hill's 'love-child' (see post 93 in the genealogy). It's all clear to me now. OMG, RUN! RUN FOR YOUR LIFE! FLEE THE FACTORY! [/GOMEZ MODE]

For the nth time today. I am posting this, Hill, because I do not want there to be any suggestion that the procedure is not fair.

@ Athena. You are volunteering as the defence for Hill? And you have accepted Phreddie as an accomplice? Slade will need to rule on this in Luis absence.[/QUOTE]
IT mentioned i was created, but it never mentioned that i commited a crime, so... bye!

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:50 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=Fiona]@ Athena. You are volunteering as the defence for Hill? And you have accepted Phreddie as an accomplice? Slade will need to rule on this in Luis absence.[/QUOTE]
I dont mind..I just hope she knows what she is doing..she has to represent hill only however.

@Hill, no I didnt have anything planned with chus about you...he had told me about your...meeting with him on that lonely night..and barry white :D ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:50 pm
by Ravager
[QUOTE=ch85us2001]I assure you that Im most trust worthy!
you know my RL name is chance
[/QUOTE]

No, it's an anagram of chance at best. :p

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:52 pm
by Hill-Shatar
you are all nuts. Chus was never interested in cancer research, except in more of a side-nothing-better-to-do-way. Besides, who could read through my ramblings, and half of it has nothing to do with genetics, not to mention that most of it you could get from any webpage on the net.

If he used my research anyways, which is not mine, it is all researchers, then he would be to blame, not me. Unless you want the scientific community knocking on your door. :p

If chus is in love with me, then it is one way, and I dearly hope that this does not mean that the next time that I walk outside chus will come racing across the yard to leap upon my leg.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:53 pm
by Athena
Yes Chus Phreddie Lestat and Lasher plotted to have Rav kidnap himself and they would frame Hill.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:56 pm
by Ravager
Whaaaaat?! No, there was never a plot for me to kidnap myself. I mean, think about it, it would be the most ineffective kidnapping in the history of kidnapping! :rolleyes: :D

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:57 pm
by Fiona
Unsupported assertion does not constitute a defence. Though your problem is not uncommon

"We have no case: abuse the opposition" :rolleyes:

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:59 pm
by slade
[QUOTE=Athena]Yes Chus Phreddie Lestat and Lasher plotted to have Rav kidnap himself and they would frame Hill.[/QUOTE]
Lasher? I wonder...Lestat...no he was the one who helped him and caught on to them along with Fiona ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:01 pm
by Ravager
[QUOTE=Fiona]Unsupported assertion does not constitute a defence. Though your problem is not uncommon

"We have no case: abuse the opposition" :rolleyes: [/QUOTE]

You cannot be a defence lawyer. You're compromised. *moves for Fiona's removal from the legal profession* :p ;)

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:04 pm
by Athena
@ Fiona oh, and you have evidence that says otherwise? My argument is logical. :D

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:05 pm
by Hill-Shatar
[QUOTE=Ravager]You cannot be a defence lawyer. You're compromised. *moves for Fiona's removal from the legal profession* :p ;) [/QUOTE]

The use of hypothetical situations in cases where a person is being wrongly prosecuted for a crime is a lawful and well used practice.

Also, you are not a lawyer, nor a judge, you are a victim. You absolute need to remove the other sides defence is somewhat... different from traditional practices. I must say this puts a whole new light upon you.

She did nothing to abuse the opposition, great one. She weas merely stating that that could have happened as well, as it is not unproven, and most of all... absolves me of all blame. :D

Besides, considering the villians in question, I would not put it past them. Athena rules! w00t! :p

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:05 pm
by Fiona
[QUOTE=Ravager]You cannot be a defence lawyer. You're compromised. *moves for Fiona's removal from the legal profession* :p ;) [/QUOTE]

:confused: I'm not a lawyer. I'm a barmaid. What are you talking about Ravager? I do my humble best to rescue you; I try to ensure that the kidnappers and their associates are brought to trial; the professionals all go to bed with no sense that justice delayed is justice denied; and now you turn on me?

Sharper than a serpent's tooth is the ingratitude of a rescued computer programme

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2005 7:07 pm
by Ravager
I thought you'd been elected by slade to act as Hill's legal representative. My apologies Fiona. :( :p