Page 4 of 4

Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2004 4:25 pm
by FireLighter
[QUOTE=Godly Force]he's right especially with the cleric/rangers not only do they have better fighting skills than a plain cleric they also get cleric AND druid spells i would suggest dual classing from ranger to cleric at levle 5 and putting the ranger profficiancies in blunt weapons and sling
oh and i think they can wear bigger armor and use better weapons than a regular cleric can[/QUOTE]
I agree there... though i'm not sure about being to wear "better" armor since clerics can wear all of the armors as well... the weapons however i believe is true.

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:10 am
by GameLoser
Rangers rule!

I love rangers... and i dont know why! perhaps it's the shared love of the outdoors, maybe its my love of elven kind (as most rangers are at least half-elf),or also thier well rounded skill and that they are very usefull, in any case i'd say ranger :cool: .(Though im fairly partial to the mage as well)

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:33 am
by Pepsimax_x5
Fighters or Rangers. Fighters are plain weapon masters while Rangers have more abilities but are less refined. I hate Paladins. Dumb abilities, weaker than Rangers (more restrictions, no two weapon fighting in BG2). Theives r alright but backstab dont get big till later levels.