Page 4 of 4

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2001 9:14 am
by Robin_Hood
uhh...oops, what a flaw :o :o :o It should be: quite a musician, not magician...Xandax, can you fix this? btw, how about dividing the character list into two sections: Argyle and FR? I believe most people have chars in both FR and Argyle...

[ 09-08-2001: Message edited by: Robin_Hood ]

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2001 11:09 am
by Xandax
Originally posted by Robin_Hood:
<STRONG>uhh...oops, what a flaw :o :o :o It should be: quite a musician, not magician...Xandax, can you fix this? btw, how about dividing the character list into two sections: Argyle and FR? I believe most people have chars in both FR and Argyle...
</STRONG>
Since I still have ftp-problems from home, it will not be updated until monday.

As for making 2 sections for characters, I think it would be better to wait until the games comes out, to see whether or not most of us will game mainly in Argyle, or we will game elsewhere. Then if we are gaming more places, we can proberly make it so we can post more characters per person. But as it seems now, the guild will make its impact on the world of Argyle, why I think we only should make guild-characters for that.
(Of course we can have lots of characters per person for different settings/modules, but as "guild"-characters go, I say we stick to argyle for now - hence only one)

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2001 1:01 pm
by Rail
Agreed, let's plan on adventuring where we please, but I plan on campaigning heavily in Argyle. Let's not split the guild or webpage. If anything, let's add a field to the characters once the game comes out stating where that character is adventuring.

Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2001 12:16 am
by Xandax
Yes - and when the game comes out and we learn more - then we might can expand the guild into more characters.