GameBanshee Forums

Originally posted by Kayless:
<STRONG>@leedog, Of course I am in favor of it. Oil is Alaska's biggest industry and most of my neighbors work on the north slope. Nobody I know has a problem with drilling.

[ 08-23-2001: Message edited by: Kayless ]</STRONG>

That's the way I look at it too. I was wanting to get an opinion fromone of you guys up there. I work right of the coast of AL myself.

I'm off for a while. behave while i'm gone!

Bush is a illigal president (ever thought about that). It should have been Al Gore!
Isn't it strange that a country as teh USA is ruled by big companies ruled by richguys that choose other richguys tomake them and other richguys more richer... Bush is destroying everyting Bill Clinton has build in the US. And mostly, it is losing its stability.
O well, he doesn't stay very long, within 3 years he's gone and things will become like it should be.

Originally posted by leedogg:
<STRONG>I work right of the coast of AL myself. </STRONG>

I didn't know there was much oil off the coast of Alabama. Any gators out there?

[ 08-23-2001: Message edited by: Kayless ]

Originally posted by Vegeta:
<STRONG>Bush is a illigal president (ever thought about that). It should have been Al Gore!
Isn't it strange that a country as teh USA is ruled by big companies ruled by richguys that choose other richguys tomake them and other richguys more richer... Bush is destroying everyting Bill Clinton has build in the US. And mostly, it is losing its stability.
O well, he doesn't stay very long, within 3 years he's gone and things will become like it should be.</STRONG>

Can you explain why you think the US is losing it's stability?

Originally posted by fable:
<STRONG>Whoa, that was a sudden shift. You sure you don't want to break this out into a separate topic? </STRONG>

Not really, I'm usually content to lurk but you guys/this board are great fun to debate with. I'm really more interested in the little league world series right now. That is fun to watch.

OOPS.

[ 08-23-2001: Message edited by: Happy Evil ]

Sorry 'bout the double posting spasm.

Originally posted by Happy Evil:
<STRONG>Sorry 'bout the double posting spasm.</STRONG>

Don't worry too much, how do you think Weasel ended up with 7000+

Originally posted by Happy Evil:
[QB]C Elgans: Great info! I still have a basic belief that the US government, as a whole, is acting in the best interest of the United States. There are checks and balances in place. Any actions that may compromise our economy or limit our national defense choices and decisions are unacceptable. History says if we cannot fight fire with fire we will soon regret it. We are all really lucky that we can choose to argue and disagree as we could have very easily lost that right in the big one.
QB]

Let me get this right, you just said screw the rest of the world we'll just look after ourselves. Thats really sad.

Originally posted by justAidan:
<STRONG>Let me get this right, you just said screw the rest of the world we'll just look after ourselves. Thats really sad.</STRONG>

Maybe it was a little brash. I basically meant that it is up to th US Government,not the world at large, (ideally its people) to decide what is and isnt in its best interest. I think that holds true for every country. Should the US simply agree with all multi-national policies because Ireland does or Japan does or four out of five do??? Not that simple.
I certainly did'nt mean "Screw the rest of the world." or thats what I would've said. With so much corruption and money in politics, its difficult to know the true motivations behind political decisions in general. One can only hope the idea of government by and for the people holds true.

I'm not saying Bush will destroy the U.S.A but checks and balances will only work to and extent right now the Executive Branch and Judical are both Conservative while Congress is barely liberal. And don't tell me that the Judges are seperate from the political arena because they aren't. so Bush is as free as it is possible maybe even more so since the court is in the conservative pocket. Bush is just too dumb to run the US.

As to the Roman empire connection the Constitution is really designed to combat the causes of the fall of the empire
1)religon(freedom)
2)incopotent rulers(impeachment)
3)corruption(tries to limit it but corruption is tied to the human race because of our ambition and complexicity)
4)civil war(freedom)

Originally posted by Kayless:
<STRONG>I didn't know there was much oil off the coast of Alabama. Any gators out there?

[ 08-23-2001: Message edited by: Kayless ]</STRONG>

There is a few gators around they bayou's, but not out where I work. You can go to mapquest and look at Dauphin Island AL and I work right there in the mississippi sound. BTW I work on a natural gas platform but there are oil and gas platforms out there also. Alabama doesn't have very much shore line, so not many people know we have an offshore industry. We are hoping Jeb Bush(Gov. of Florida) will one day let them start exploration over there soon. Initial surveys show some of the biggest natural gas deposits in North America are there. Plus it will keep me close to home.

Originally posted by justAidan:
<STRONG>Let me get this right, you just said screw the rest of the world we'll just look after ourselves. Thats really sad.</STRONG>

Well I believe in looking out for #1 first then do what you can elsewhere. Not saying that I think we are better than anyone else, it is just my motto. Personally, I think the our government pokes their nose in too many folks business. We should tend to our own first. Every country should. I am gonna get flamed for this, but everyone wants the US to step up every time something happens, and then still give give give. Good ole Big Brother USA.

One can only hope the idea of government by and for the people holds true.

was that a joke?

The oil industri and the wepons industri just bought them selfs a nice puppet to run the country. it would be called corruption anywhere else - in us its called democracy.

further more:
"Imagine that we read of an election occurring anywhere in the third world in which the self-declared winner was the son of the former prime minister and that former prime minister was, himself, the former head of that nation's secret police (the CIA).

"Imagine the self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some old colonial holdover from the nation's pre-democracy past [the Electoral College].

"Imagine that the self-declared winner's 'victory' turned on disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother.

"Imagine that the poorly drafted ballots of one district, a district heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of voters to vote for the wrong candidate.

"None of us would deem such an election to be representative of anything other than the self-declared winner's will to power. All of us, I imagine, would wearily turn the page thinking that it was another sad tale of pitiful pre- or anti-democracy peoples in some strange, faraway elsewhere."


I think that i heard about an old woman who walked across the continent in protest of the big money and companies involved in politics. well - if its true then i think she is brave and hope more people would stand up for democracy.

Tom

[ 08-24-2001: Message edited by: Tom ]

The sad thing is that the so many people voted for Bush because they accepted his campaign material that pronounced him a moderate. Bush's own record shows that he was never a moderate in any sense; he has been consistently far to the right in American politics (which means waaaaay far to the right for the rest of the known universe).

The latest Bush news is the speech announcing the unilateral abrogation of the ICBM defense treaty with the Soviet. This is the first time in the history of the US that it has unilaterally withdrawn from a treaty intended to foster peace. Some members of Congress are promising a fight.

But I'm even more impressed by Bush's single-minded pursuit of a way to kill the budget surplus through tax rebates. With hard work and perserverence, he's undoing all the efforts to kill the world's highest debt, which Reagan built (through his cutting of federal banking regulations: 50 billion US dollar debt occurred in one year, alone) and Clinton solved over the protests of the Republican Congress. (They claimed his plan, which ultimately worked, would bankrupt the country.)

I have a vision of the US building steel-reinforced walls around itself, then slowly folding them in until the rest of the universe is blocked out. Am I wrong in this?

Originally posted by Fezek:
<STRONG>@Eminem-san. Would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative?</STRONG>

Put in this way - I think Attorney General Ashcroft is Christ's Vicar on Earth (or should be!)

@Fezek: You might think Fable's analogy between the Roman Empire and the present US is invalid, but actually, in the European press I've seen several debate articles written by political analysts, historicans etc.

@Tom: Did you see the comment from a Russian MP I posted in the Eminem thread?

@Fable: The somewhat isolationistic image you see, certainly coincides with the general European perspective of recent US politics. Just check the big international newssites with deep political analysis like BBC or CNN.

Happy evil

History says if we cannot fight fire with fire we will soon regret it. We are all really lucky that we can choose to argue and disagree as we could have very easily lost that right in the big one.

The europeans almost lost it in the second bigun but they were lucky that Hitler went mad and declared war on usa - otherwise usa would not have enterd the war against germany.


leedogg

Well I believe in looking out for #1 first then do what you can elsewhere. Not saying that I think we are better than anyone else, it is just my motto. Personally, I think the our government pokes their nose in too many folks business. We should tend to our own first. Every country should. I am gonna get flamed for this, but everyone wants the US to step up every time something happens, and then still give give give.

i belive that the morality that holds for individuals also holds for nations.

America and europe are like two rich men ignoring the sick and dying. they might say "we have to take care of our selfs first" but how much more do these rich men need before they help others? 3 cars? 4?

50% of the worlds population has never used a phone. The wealth of the world is concentrating more and more. the good need to take that money and distribute it.