GameBanshee Forums

*ignoring*

what?

I found the thread when I saw you were a little noob... awww.... but you had one before that and I read it too... AWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

Heres the one I remember.

ARF? sounds more like a dog than a dragon, No offence Rav, but honestly...

ARF ARF ARF ARF

@ WAS. ARF= Fat Pixie. Now laugh at Rav.

hill1 wrote:I found the thread when I saw you were a little noob... awww.... but you had one before that and I read it too... AWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

Why do I have to suffer this? Is this someone's idea of inventive torture?!

ARF= Fat Pixie. Now laugh at Rav.

Thus confirming my statement

@was, yeah, that's the drawback . Have to work on that.

[QUOTE=Ravager]Why do I have to suffer this? Is this someone's idea of inventive torture?!

@was, yeah, that's the drawback . Have to work on that.[/QUOTE]

You should know that with the age joke you brought it on your head...

*does cheek thing to Rav.*

wow, this thread really has degenerated into an *im gonna insult cos theirs nuttin better to do* thread.........
.... i preferred the ONE!!!! WORD!!!!! SHOUTING!!!!! COMPETITION!!!!!

Actually this is pretty much the usual when hill and I spam. Vague insults. You need a thick skin...

I was just reading counting with Aegis...

We should start a new thread. Word Assosiation or Hangman. but theyve already been used... that would be fun until the mods dropped upon us.

We could always resurrect an old thread or two...

New!!!!!! Thread!!!!

No, they were both closed, but I know that fable spammed in the asosiation one and closed the handman one, and xandax killed the word assosiation one...

I wonder if it would be worth it to pop up another thread.

[QUOTE=hill1]I wonder if it would be worth it to pop up another thread.[/QUOTE]

It would probably work, as long as no-one spam it too far off-topic or anything.

the handman one

WOW, what a perverted thread...

mmm... it needs a one word reason for one word answers. word assosiation, you posted a word and was done with it.

But Im not starting a new thread. Ive only got in trouble twice and both times were minor (lots of asterix in that post there hill)(dont tell of someone for doing something stupid ike making a name just to advertise a forum). both times I deserved it. Id rather not be making another deservable telling off thingy...

does that make sense?

I think that makes sense .

I think the other threads were closed due to the short answers, but the riddles survived. If there was some way to get round that...with mid-sized post responses...

Like what?

and do NOT say that stupid attrcting thread thingy again. I read that and people began making theorys of who fiting with who in 2 word answers with percentages...

what about a twenty question game, you think of something, and then the guessers have 20 yes or no questions to find out what the *thing* is...

each quest. can be a post...

I don't know. Can't think of anything for that right now.

each quest. can be a post...

I think that's the kind of thing the mods were objecting. Unless every poster put those 20 questions in a post (rather than 20 seperate posts).

hmm... and i guess that 'eye spy' just wouldnt work

Unless every poster put those 20 questions in a post (rather than 20 seperate posts).

but the point of the game is that each consecutive question narrows down to a result...

I spy something that is black.

your writing for the answer?

Correct!