spells vs spell-like abilities
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:07 am
ok, here's my problem.
mate of mine took a prestige class that had prerequisite: "must have the ability to cast summon monster 4"
he entered this class using a feat that gives him summon monster as a spell-like ability
I claim this is a illegal build on the acount of semantics because you have to have the ability to CAST it (spells are CAST, spell-like abilities are USED)
I showed him thread on wizards.com that clearly says that SL abilities are not spells, but still he wants more proof, and our DM is unsure of it all, so I beg of you, mighty users of the Internet to cast final vote.
thx
mate of mine took a prestige class that had prerequisite: "must have the ability to cast summon monster 4"
he entered this class using a feat that gives him summon monster as a spell-like ability
I claim this is a illegal build on the acount of semantics because you have to have the ability to CAST it (spells are CAST, spell-like abilities are USED)
I showed him thread on wizards.com that clearly says that SL abilities are not spells, but still he wants more proof, and our DM is unsure of it all, so I beg of you, mighty users of the Internet to cast final vote.
thx