New System for Mass Effect
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:08 am
All,
I just found out about Mass Effect a few weeks ago. Being a big fan of KotOR, I’m very eager to try BioWare’s latest title. My PC is 5 years old (bought it for KotOR), so I’m going to upgrade to a new system before I take the ME plunge. I’m also a big fan of Morrowind, and my old machine would just barely meet the min requirements for Oblivion. I’ve decided to build my own system rather than buying a name-brand machine so I'll be able to upgrade components later and I’d like your opinions on the best components to start with. For no particular reason other than familiarity, I’m going to use a Pentium processor and an NVidia graphics card.
I’m not looking for a gamer’s god box (luckily neither game seems to have excessive requirements). I’d rather focus on components that exceed the recommended systems but have been out long enough to be affordable. I’ll upgrade to the higher performance stuff later when the price comes down, assuming it’s needed to support future games (I’ve heard that ME is the first of a trilogy). The recommended system for the two games is a 3GHz P4, a GeForce 7900 GTX or higher and 2 GB RAM. I’ll be starting out with XP since Oblivion doesn’t support Vista. The first decision is a motherboard and processor combination.
As I see it, the motherboard is the key for future upgrade potential, so that’s the component that I’d rather not skimp on. I’m thinking of a MSI P7N SLI Platinum or a GigaByte GA-EP45-DS3L. The MSI costs $180 and was recommended by the guy at CompUSA. The GigaByte costs $114 and was recommended on the Ars system guide. I’ve got the various specs but have no idea what is important and what’s not.
As for the processor, I’m looking at the Core 2 Duo E4700 and a Core 2 Duo E7200. They’re both about the same price ($120 to $140); the CompUSA guy recommended an E4600, but the E4700 is the same price. The E7200 was recommended in the Ars system guide. The E4700 “beats” the E7200 at processor speed (2.6 GHz vs. 2.53 GHz) but the E7200 “beats” the E4700 at cache size (3MB vs. 2MB) and bus speed (1066 MHz vs. 800 MHz).
So what’s your opinion and rationale on these two options for the system foundation or what would you recommend as an alternative?
Thanks.
I just found out about Mass Effect a few weeks ago. Being a big fan of KotOR, I’m very eager to try BioWare’s latest title. My PC is 5 years old (bought it for KotOR), so I’m going to upgrade to a new system before I take the ME plunge. I’m also a big fan of Morrowind, and my old machine would just barely meet the min requirements for Oblivion. I’ve decided to build my own system rather than buying a name-brand machine so I'll be able to upgrade components later and I’d like your opinions on the best components to start with. For no particular reason other than familiarity, I’m going to use a Pentium processor and an NVidia graphics card.
I’m not looking for a gamer’s god box (luckily neither game seems to have excessive requirements). I’d rather focus on components that exceed the recommended systems but have been out long enough to be affordable. I’ll upgrade to the higher performance stuff later when the price comes down, assuming it’s needed to support future games (I’ve heard that ME is the first of a trilogy). The recommended system for the two games is a 3GHz P4, a GeForce 7900 GTX or higher and 2 GB RAM. I’ll be starting out with XP since Oblivion doesn’t support Vista. The first decision is a motherboard and processor combination.
As I see it, the motherboard is the key for future upgrade potential, so that’s the component that I’d rather not skimp on. I’m thinking of a MSI P7N SLI Platinum or a GigaByte GA-EP45-DS3L. The MSI costs $180 and was recommended by the guy at CompUSA. The GigaByte costs $114 and was recommended on the Ars system guide. I’ve got the various specs but have no idea what is important and what’s not.
As for the processor, I’m looking at the Core 2 Duo E4700 and a Core 2 Duo E7200. They’re both about the same price ($120 to $140); the CompUSA guy recommended an E4600, but the E4700 is the same price. The E7200 was recommended in the Ars system guide. The E4700 “beats” the E7200 at processor speed (2.6 GHz vs. 2.53 GHz) but the E7200 “beats” the E4700 at cache size (3MB vs. 2MB) and bus speed (1066 MHz vs. 800 MHz).
So what’s your opinion and rationale on these two options for the system foundation or what would you recommend as an alternative?
Thanks.