Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

-2 on attack roll *minor spoilers*

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to BioWare's Baldur's Gate and Baldur's Gate: Tales of the Sword Coast expansion pack.
Post Reply
User avatar
Solusek
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 5:37 pm
Contact:

-2 on attack roll *minor spoilers*

Post by Solusek »

So.. on my new game of BG1 I noticed something strange. Sometimes when I fight someone I get a penalty of -2 on my attack roll. For example when fighting Ajantis in AR1400. It says for example, Attack Roll: 16 - 2 = 14 : Hit. I'm using a regular longsword. Shouldn't I rather get a bonus because I'm playing an elf? o.O

My char:
Elf
Fighter/Mage
Level: 1/1
Lawful Evil
Abilties:
Str: 18/97
Dex: 19
Con: 17
Int: 18
Wis: 14
Cha: 08

Proficiencies:
Bow: 2 points
Large Sword: 2 points

Mods:
Baldurdash Fixpack
BG1: Unfinished Business


I'm a little rusty concerning the old AD&D Rules BG1 is using. Could it be that I just get a penalty to my attack role for every level that my opponent is higher than myself? Iirc Ajantis is lvl 3 when you let him join your party, while my main char is still level 1.

Edit: Ok, that can't be it. Just invited him and he's only lvl 2. He's wearing a standard chain mail + medium shield and is wielding a bastard sword btw.

Edit2: Got it I think. It has got to be some special armor bonus vs. slashing applied by his chain mail. Chain Mail is apparently strong vs. slashing(-2 to enemy attack rolls), but susceptible to crushing damage(+2 to enemy attack rolls). Scale Mail for example is strong vs. crushing(-2), good vs. piercing(-1), good vs. missiles(-1) and has no susceptibilities. Plate Mails are excellent vs. slashing(-3) and also without weaknesses. Nothing of this is mentioned in the respective armor descriptions though =//

So long,
Sol
User avatar
Pellinore
Posts: 635
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:34 pm
Location: West Virginia
Contact:

Post by Pellinore »

Well, I don't know if it was implememented in the game but I do believe in 2nd edition AD&D Paladins had a permanent Protection vs. Evil on them... can't remember...
"Korax thinks you look very tasty today...
User avatar
Rav
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 4:23 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Rav »

Different armor types have different attack roll penalties or bonusses for the person attacking them.

So when fighting someone in Chain mail, if you have a bludgeoning weapon you get a +2 to hit. If fighting someone in Leather, I believe you get a +2 to hit if you use a piercing weapon.

You can see the exact penalties in the character record screen.
User avatar
Philos
Posts: 781
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 12:07 pm
Location: Near the house that Elvis built
Contact:

Post by Philos »

Adding to what RAV said, there are other items and factors which can effect the "die" roll. What you are seeing is the "net" effect of all pluses and all minus totalled before the "die" roll. You might be getting +1 for weapon proficiency but the opponents armor/special ability/ or a magic protection item (like a belt of protection from blunt attacks) might add up to -3 so the net effect would be -2 to your die roll.

SPOILER**
Spoiler
In my current game my PC is wearing a pair of Boots of Avoidance (taken off of Nimbul) Anhkeg armor and have a dexterity of 18. So when archers shoot at him I see their die rolls come across with a minimum of -7 modification (ex: 18-7=11. Unless they roll a 20, which is an automatic hit, they are not going to hit me!!
UNCOMMON VALOR WAS A COMMON VIRTUE
Post Reply