Page 1 of 1

Why, Fidel, why?

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:34 am
by Delacroix
Fidel Castro now is colecting people signatures in Cuba to make a permanent change on the Constitution, in the meaning of reafirmate the Comunist monoparti system.

"The Imperialists control and the Capitalist system will never rule Cuba anymore."- Fidel Castro, in the Celebration of Che Guevara and Antonio Maceo birthday.




Now, Since when Fidel Castro need to colect signatures to change the Constitution?

It's sounds too much "formal" :) for him. :)

Especially since he know that he is largely suported.

You see anything or have any opinion about it?

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:37 am
by /-\lastor
Hmm the only comment I have I dont fancy the world going tru all this commie-crap again.

No offence

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:46 am
by Craig
Wheres Mr.Jingles?

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:53 am
by Weasel
Link to one story


I say let Fidel have his signing. No matter what is written down..nothing is ever permanent.

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 4:55 am
by Delacroix
Originally posted by /-\lastor
Hmm the only comment I have I dont fancy the world going tru all this commie-crap again.
Again? He is just oficializing the "Common Law".


BTW, he made this National Campaign with a 7 MINUTES speech; probably a record for him :) .

The real purpose still a mystery to me.

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 5:02 am
by Weasel
Originally posted by Delacroix
The real purpose still a mystery to me.
Like the kings of yester year, he wants to leave a lasting "legacy". Delusions of Grandeur.

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 7:39 am
by fable
Fidel Castro now is colecting people signatures in Cuba to make a permanent change on the Constitution, in the meaning of reafirmate the Comunist monoparti system.

Castro is an old-line Communist dictator, possibly the only one in the last quarter of a century who actually believed in that system of government. I will give anybody 10-to-1 odds that within two years of his death, biographies begin to appear to place him in a tragic light as "a man out of his time."

I see this attempt to enshrine the one-party state Constitutionally as an effort to reach beyond the grave, despite the fact that he knows what he has built is doomed.

Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 8:40 am
by Pregethwr
Actually Fidel was never much of a communist, more a vaguely left-wing nationalist.

He was never a member of the communist party until he reached power and while he was organising trade unions in Cuba was fairly anti-communist.

When he first came to power he said (along the lines of) "this will be a green revolution, steering a middle way between east and west, capitalism and communism".

However he quickly learnt if he didn't make a deal with the USSR his Government would be destroyed by its large, powerful neighbour so he began learning his Marx and party-line.

There are people around him who have serious communist pedigree however - his brother Raul is fairly Stalinist and one of the great hopes of the Cubans is that when Fidel dies it is not Raul who takes over.