Page 1 of 2

Deep but not Profound (game)

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:28 am
by frogus
Someone says "x but not y" (where x and y are replaced by words, obviously) and the statement is either true or false. Winning is basically working out the Rule.

The Rule is blindingly obvious once you get it, and difficult to get, and the game is fun.

BUT NEVER STATE THE RULE!

I start: Deep but not profound.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:43 am
by Vicsun
I think I speak for a lot of people when I say "huh?" :confused:


So... the second person is supposed to try to guess The Rule? Because if that's so what you're basically trying to get us to do is to see a pattern from only one line... and that's not possible.

Or is it someone else's turn to say "x but not y" and you'll tell him wether it follows the rule or not? And what has the validness of the statement got to do with the game (you said it was either true or false...)?


If I am supposed to post a statement after yours that's it:

Shallow but not simple.

If not, just ignore it :)

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:33 pm
by fable
I think I get the rule. Maybe.

Heavy, but not meaningful.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:46 pm
by Yshania
Hmmm...my idea;

Tell but not mention?

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:49 pm
by Yshania
Another, just to see.

Flawless but not perfect?

If I have got it right, then I say that Frogus' statement is true, Vicsun's statement is true, but fable's is false :)

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 12:58 pm
by Xandax
If this is as simple as I think it is ... then :D


But why not:


Toll but not tax.


Edit: if I'm correct - it is even easier then "who got the ball" game we used to "play" at parties driving some people mad untill they got it.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 1:04 pm
by Yshania
I say Xandax' statement is true :)

Ok, carried but not borne.

If we are wrong, Xandax, we should play our own rules :D

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 5:55 pm
by fable
Dry, but not witty.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 8:30 pm
by Gwalchmai
So far, everyone's statement's have been true, except both of Fable's, his second was even the opposite of false.

I love food, but not to eat.

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 10:23 pm
by Xandax
Originally posted by Yshania
I say Xandax' statement is true :)

Ok, carried but not borne.

If we are wrong, Xandax, we should play our own rules :D


Yeah ...

rules are here to be.......
followed, but not broken :D

Bah, easy this :D

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:44 pm
by fable
Surely it's not as simple as--

True but not accurate?
Sure but not certain?
Silly but not ridiculous?

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:20 am
by Xandax
you are rigth in one thing fable.

It is .... silly, but not ridiculous. :D

And that is .... accurate, but not true :p

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:53 am
by frogus
Ysh, Gwally and Xandax have got it...

Fable, this game is witty but not dry.

Accurate but not true
Silly but not ridiculous

and neither sure nor certain.

It is also difficult but not very. :)

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 7:08 am
by Lazarus
Bloodstalker, but not fable.

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 9:17 am
by frogus
Bloodstalker, but not fable.
True!

And therefore; beer but not wine.

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 10:44 am
by fable
So, beef, but not pork? Charness, but not Rand? Spoon, but not fork?

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2003 11:54 am
by Yshania
@Fable, all of your statements are true :)

Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:40 pm
by IHateUsernames
Heard of this before, but never got the rule.

Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2003 11:46 am
by IHateUsernames
Thought i had it for a sec but then i saw fables post.

Back to square one.

Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2003 12:19 pm
by frogus
This game is useless, but not worthwhile.