GameBanshee Forums

i have been wondering, Is this too cheap for my kensai?

Yes. It might be slightly more reasonable if you reduced all of those values down to 25 (or less).

However, bear in mind I am not a power gamer,
I find the game is already easy enough, so personally I've no wish to make it even less challenging.

hehe i dont like making it too easy either but the games unarmored skill is way to crappy.

with this item it makes his armor be the same as if he were a warrior with daedric armor but he is still mobile

Consider what were intended as difficult quests for higher end items, and all the character development you went through, to get 'em--and most have perhaps 1 CE, and that at considerably less than 100 points. Take into account, too, of how broken the economy is: how much used soulgems sell for.

An item like that should be a priceless mage heirloom worth 100,000 drakes or more, if it's being sold to the public.

I'm thinking of making an economy mod, whereby weapons and items cost more than what they are already and traders having more credits..i think that would make it much better for the game.

Mad Loco, this is getting into a separate area of discussion. You're welcome to start a different thread, but I should tell you that there are at least 3 mods available now that focus entirely on revamping prices for goods and services, as well as merchant cash on hand; while another 5 to my knowledge do that, as well as a lot else. I use several of 'em.

Ehm, why don't you just activate GOD mode and be done with it. I think those stats make you unhittable by just about anything. Oh and also why do you need feather? Fortify Str 100 is better. Or did you not want to go over the top?

ok everyone here seems to have the same opinion that it is to cheap and I'm not exactly disagreeing with them i just want to say that one of the best things about this game is its what YOU make of it. this game is no more difficult or easy than You want it to be. If you feel that the game would be fun using that then hey man more power to you if you feel that that would make it too easy and there for a bore then you might want to change it. Just do what you feel is going to make the game more fun.

[QUOTE=Asher]ok everyone here seems to have the same opinion that it is to cheap and I'm not exactly disagreeing with them i just want to say that one of the best things about this game is its what YOU make of it. .[/QUOTE]

Absolutely, but Raumoheru was specifically asking if we thought it was too cheap--that's the purpose of this thread. No one's ragging on him, just answering his question.

So you are using hand to hand? Well...

1# i would change restore magicka 3 pts...

2# feather, shield and sanctuary to 25-75

3# attack can be what it is now..

4# Fortify unarmored just looks pointless to me.. so why dont you do fortify hand to hand 50 points?

i added feather because i use the daedric dai-katana and it weighs 60 lbs. and my clothes and crap got weight, and i makes me not be able to jump as far with the weight. i dunno about 1 in every 10 hits from a balmora gaurd on 100 difficulty hits me and almost everything in Solstheim hits me pretty often on 100 diff.

with the fortified unarmored it raises your armor from 65 to like 260 and i cheated to test hand to hand and 50 pnts hand to hand upgrade makes little to no difference.

!# Restoration... Destruction...

to fable
I never said you guys were ragging on him did I? the whole point to my post was to let Raumoheru know that my opion is that I felt that it doesnt matter if its cheap as long as he is having fun. thats all I wanted to say thats all I'm saying now is even if he were to creat an item that kills what ever comes within 20 ft of him if thats how he wants to play then who really gives a **** if its cheap. hell I use the royal signet ring. I am sorry that you seemed to think that my post was saying that you guys were ragging and even if you were he kinda brought it on himself by askin but I am stating hy opion that it dont matter if its cheap.

Gods, Asher, calm down. There's nothing of censure in my post, unless my smile emoticon is concealing a rifle in its mouth.