Page 1 of 2

The ultimate party -- I BET NOBODY THOUGHT OF THIS ONE!!!! -- Haha, read & be amazed

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2001 6:49 pm
by leeman_s
Actually, this is my party. Me (necro mage), Minsc, Aerie, Jan, Viconia, and Anomen. Should I drop any of these guys for Haer'Dalis? Please help me guys.

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2001 7:12 pm
by Pebz
Drop Jan or something... but what does your post have to do with the topic anyway? :rolleyes:

Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2001 7:46 pm
by fable
You know, L, this is kind of annoying. I mean, you posted the exact same question down a few hours ago, using a different topic title ("Haerdalis vs Viconia"), and instead of waiting for answers, you have to post it again. Why do you need to take up the extra space, and fake us out with that trick of a false topic heading? Why not just wait for answers, like everybody else?

[ 06-30-2001: Message edited by: fable ]

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 1:30 am
by Xyx
It's not the first false topic header, either... Hope this idea doesn't catch on :mad: :mad: :mad:

Not the way to get any positive feedback either, I would say. Just look at what it turned up. :rolleyes:

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:41 am
by Astafas
Yes, I am amazed, but not in the way you think. What makes you belive that party's so very special?

You should drop Aerie for Haer'Dalis and either Anomen or Viconia for Cernd or Jaheira.

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 6:51 am
by Dark Mage
You should drop either Anomen or Viconia
depend on your alignment, you don't need two
clerics in your party, Aerie is a half cleric already. Need more tanks in your party, because Minsc and Boo alone can't stand long, Haer'Dalis is no tank.

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 6:54 am
by ReignsOfPower
2 Cleric is actually very helpful.
Then again, One Cleric and one Druid is even better.

Go for Anohmen and Cernd as your healser. Cernd has 18 wisdom so he is quite good.

In comparison Cernd is actually better than Sir Anohmen. This is arguable though. Image

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 7:29 am
by leeman_s
Why is a cleric and druid better than two clerics?

Anomen can actually be a tank, it works for me at least.

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 9:59 am
by rapier
Druids have some spells clerics do not: fire elemental,iron skins, nature's beauty...

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:42 pm
by velvetfreak
L, two things:
  • I'm not amazed.
  • You've annoyed me enough with the false heading not to respond to your question.
You can consider that a complaint.

vf

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 5:54 pm
by Fezek
L, you think your party is good wait till you see this;

1) Jester
2) Wizard Slayer 5 points in Sling
3) Beast Master
4) Totemic Druid
5) Swashbuckler
6) Mage: Transmuter
:eek:

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 6:30 pm
by 666_SALEM_666
wizard slayer is in all honesty...*cough*... GAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 7:55 pm
by KensaiRyu
I am not ammused by posts like this either. Play your games elsewhere and expect no positive replies to something like this from me. :(

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2001 8:26 pm
by fable
I think there are enough complaints here to go to Buck with it.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2001 1:25 am
by Aegon
Dude... not cool. I hate pulling up headers that look like they might be fun to read to gind out it was "bait and shift."

Go away....

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2001 4:13 am
by Daniel
I prefer a party with some fighters, a mage, a thief, a druid or cleric. In BG2 my team was: Me (Daniel, a fighter), -Keldorn, Valygar or Minsc (I sometimes swap them)-, Aerie, Imoen and Jaheira.
In BG1 my party was almost in the same style (with 3 fighters (one archer), 1 thief, 1 mage, 1 druid/fighter).
A good team must have a similar stucture, where all types of NPC's are in. I prefer a team that can kill quikly and a thief who can easily detect traps and open locks. And naturally some mages and clerics for magical damage and defensive spells.

In your teamn for instance, I think you can have another fighter in the party. No Hear-Dalis, because he doesn't have much HitPoints, you already got a good thief!

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2001 5:07 am
by Mr Sleep
I am not sticking up for L but if you have problems with him Private Message/email him and do not degrade into flaming unnecessarily, it is not worthy of us and we are better than that. :

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2001 8:16 am
by RA
666_salem_666,

A wizard slayer is maybe good as an archer, not as a fighter. Why? with a bow you have more attacks a round and they disrupt spellcasting, so a enemy mage would be screwed.
Fezek cuold better take a bow because you have more attacks a round.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2001 2:57 am
by 666_SALEM_666
F@CK man you r so cool!!!

i mean, that party you created was just totally F#CKING AWESOME!

i could never hav thought of such an ingenious party. u totally rool!

my idol used to be Don King but u've just secured yourself at the top spot!!!

I BOW BEFORE YOUR *cough* HUMBLENESS! *cough*

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2001 3:00 am
by 666_SALEM_666
by the way i was directing that last post at L, not you RA.