Planescape setting and Torment
Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2005 4:17 am
I'm just curious, are there any big divergences between the Planescape setting from TSR and PS: T? I know that there are some things about PS: T that diverge from the D&D 3.5 online d20 thingamajiggy. For example, undead, if they have minds at all, are always supposed to be evil which I don't think is the case with the Dead Nations (Hargrimm isn't very nice to you when he jails you, and Acaste is certainly evil, but Stale Mary seems nice enough). There are supposed to be a kind of "pseudo-undead" in the Eberron setting, called the Deathless, which can be good, who are raised by the elves of Aerenal, but the Deathless are supposed to be rather different in terms of the magic which keeps them alive than ordinary undead. Also, Tanar'ri are always supposed to be chaotic evil. No reformed Succubi in the 3.5 monster manual.
I don't have a copy of the Planescape Campaign Setting, or even the Manual of the Planes. I have looked around Planeswalker, the independent group TSR spun Planescape off to when they discontinued the setting.
This is not to attack Torment, by the way. I liked both the Dead Nations and Fall-from-Grace. I'm just curious about where the Planescape setting and Torment diverge from each other, if at all.
I don't have a copy of the Planescape Campaign Setting, or even the Manual of the Planes. I have looked around Planeswalker, the independent group TSR spun Planescape off to when they discontinued the setting.
This is not to attack Torment, by the way. I liked both the Dead Nations and Fall-from-Grace. I'm just curious about where the Planescape setting and Torment diverge from each other, if at all.