Silver hilt: Look out!
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2001 4:45 am
After leaving the Underdark, I left for Waukeen's promenade as usual. As usual there was a rubble of githyankis waiting for me there. As usual, the rubble was found rude, stinking and ugly so that its chance to get the silver sword was rather minimal. As usual, the words were replaced by swords soon. As usual, the rubble was sent to hell. Nothing extraordinary.
As usual, I went to the Cernd's house, which I use as my base in Akathla. Suddenly, I was attacked by the crier near the Adventurer's Mart. I put myself out of sight (I do not kill bystanders) and searched what's wrong. I found that my reputation dropped from 20 to 4.
Yes, there were causalties in the preceeding fight but it wasn't me who murdered there. I used only my melee weapons against the rubble. No magic (it wasn't necessary). On the other hand, the rubble was really unscrupulous. Nevertheless, I was found guilty for the slaughter. My reputation get lost. The reaction of the crier is now understandable: he attacked the criminals which he saw in action.
I have found only one explanation. A gihyanki cast an area effect offensive spell and some innocent somehow survived. Because of being attacked, the innocent became RED. Now, your party attacks anything red. It is possible that somebody in your party attacked the innocent. This was a begining of a known self-powered chain reaction. If it is so, then it is a serious fault in a game logic, moreover an unavoidable one. Everybody in the game is either your ally, your enemy or a neutral. The innocent cannot be an enemy of your enemy.
Q: Has anybody a better explanation?
Q: Is my explanation incorrect?
Let us continue. As far as my experience is concerned, there were almost always victims of the fight at the Promenade. As if the killings of innocents were - somehow - INTENTIONAL! Suppose it for a moment and consider the consequences. Then it would be the most embarrasing foul played on me by the game I've ever seen. But don't let us suspect the authors from such behaviour.
As usual, I went to the Cernd's house, which I use as my base in Akathla. Suddenly, I was attacked by the crier near the Adventurer's Mart. I put myself out of sight (I do not kill bystanders) and searched what's wrong. I found that my reputation dropped from 20 to 4.
Yes, there were causalties in the preceeding fight but it wasn't me who murdered there. I used only my melee weapons against the rubble. No magic (it wasn't necessary). On the other hand, the rubble was really unscrupulous. Nevertheless, I was found guilty for the slaughter. My reputation get lost. The reaction of the crier is now understandable: he attacked the criminals which he saw in action.
I have found only one explanation. A gihyanki cast an area effect offensive spell and some innocent somehow survived. Because of being attacked, the innocent became RED. Now, your party attacks anything red. It is possible that somebody in your party attacked the innocent. This was a begining of a known self-powered chain reaction. If it is so, then it is a serious fault in a game logic, moreover an unavoidable one. Everybody in the game is either your ally, your enemy or a neutral. The innocent cannot be an enemy of your enemy.
Q: Has anybody a better explanation?
Q: Is my explanation incorrect?
Let us continue. As far as my experience is concerned, there were almost always victims of the fight at the Promenade. As if the killings of innocents were - somehow - INTENTIONAL! Suppose it for a moment and consider the consequences. Then it would be the most embarrasing foul played on me by the game I've ever seen. But don't let us suspect the authors from such behaviour.