Page 1 of 1
Ranger or Paladin?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2000 12:57 am
by EternalKnight
I have been debating whether to be a ranger or a paladin. I initially picked ranger because they are pretty good fighters and have stealth to boot. But then I saw that with certain kits you couldn't use certain armors. But then I saw paladin, and I liked the Undead Hunter. I have trouble with the undead, so it attracted me. But I still cant make up my mind, I like high stealth (I'm not a bad guy or nothing, but being invisible is cool and really helpful). What do you "old guys" think?
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2000 1:33 am
by rumagent
Well, I have a soft spot for the Inquisitor. They have nice immunities + the best magic dispel in the game and true sight thrown in for good measure.
------------------
"Beyond the grave they will find nothing but death. But we shall keep the secret, and for their happiness we shall allure them with the reward of heaven and eternity." -- Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:53 am
by Hex92
I say go for a straight Ranger, forget the kits. Dump 3 prof. slots into dual wield (you automatically get 2 I think). Then get prof. in longswords, warhammers (for Crom Faer), and longbows.
My ranger is @ lvl 12 or 13. I have a -10 AC WITHOUT a shield (18 dex, red dragon scale, ring of gaxx, Helm of defense, some more stuff that I can't remember), ~120 hp, 7/2 for attacks. Just think about what happens when he gets hasted
He chops, he slices, he dices
There already is a good paladin in the game (Keldorn), so I would just pick him up.
Hex92
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2000 8:56 am
by Maurice
Well, if you also have Viconia in your party, you might think twice before having him along. Otherwise, after a while, he chops, he slices, he dices ...