Page 1 of 1

Why Controlling Your Temper is Big in Virginia

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:46 am
by Aqua-chan
WASHINGTON - To the locals, it's the "McMissile" case.

And like the name, the details of it spill forth like a bad joke: A woman is driving north on Interstate 95. Three kids squirm in the back seat, and her sister, six months pregnant and having early contractions, sits in the front. The stress starts to simmer. Traffic slows, then crawls, then creeps. More stress. A car cuts in front of her, then scoots away. A short time later, it darts in again. She can no longer take it. She veers onto the shoulder and speeds up. Wham! She tosses a large McDonald's cup filled with ice into the other car.

"From my side, I heard a whoomp," recalled the woman's sister, LaJeanna Porter, 27. "I was like, 'I know you didn't throw that cup.' She said, 'Yes I did.' "

Neither woman foresaw the seemingly supersize repercussions of that misguided moment July 2.

No one was injured, but the cup launcher, Jessica Hall, 25, of Jacksonville, N.C., was charged and convicted by a Stafford County jury of maliciously throwing a missile into an occupied vehicle, a felony in Virginia. The instructions given to the jury said that "any physical object can be considered a missile. A missile can be propelled by any force, including throwing."

Hall, a mother of three young children whose husband is serving his third tour in Iraq, has spent more than a month in jail.

The jury sentenced her to two years in prison, the minimum, and a judge will formally impose a sentence Wednesday. Under state law, the judge can only decrease the jury's sentence.

"We didn't think it would go this far," Hall said in an interview at the Rappahannock Regional Jail. "Two years! What did I do?"

There are two versions of what happened that day. The occupants of both cars agree on this: It was hot, the kind of hot in which legs stick to leather seats, and the traffic was barely moving, slowed by a fatal crash up the road in Prince William County.

In one car, driver Pete Ballin, 36, and girlfriend Eliza Fowle, 28, were heading home to the District after visiting her father in North Carolina. They said they were maneuvering through the stalled traffic, not even noticing Hall until the Mickey-D moment.


"I guess we inadvertently merged back in front of her," Fowle said. "She apparently took that as some sort of aggressive maneuver on our part."

The next thing they knew, Fowle said, Hall was pulling up in the emergency lane and "chucking a big, supersized McDonald's cup at us." It flew diagonally across Ballin and onto Fowle. "It was gross and sticky and got all over me and the front of our car, the dashboard and the windshield," Fowle said.

Hall, whose family was driving from North Carolina to New York for a family party, saw the situation differently. She said she had never driven that route and was trying to keep up with her father's truck when Ballin cut in front of her the second time, causing her to swerve onto the shoulder. She said she was worried because her sister's bulging belly almost slammed into the dashboard.

Hall's next move was wrong, she said, but she felt provoked.

"It was past me ignoring him. I'm not going to lie; I was cursing him," she said. "I took the McDonald's cup. I tossed it over my car."

She never fathomed that it would land her in jail for the first time in her life, wearing a standard-issue jumpsuit frayed up both legs and learning to curl her hair using toilet paper. Not even when she saw Ballin talking to the state trooper up the highway, or when she was arrested and released on her own recognizance, or even when a trial date was set for Jan. 3.

Even when Ballin testified, Hall said, "I'm thinking about what I'm going to cook when I get home."

"I passed out when they said guilty, two years," she added. "I became a convicted felon."

Fowle stands by the couple's decision to report the crime but concedes that even she and Ballin were surprised at the conviction.

"I think that this is way too much of a punishment for her actions. This is just to me absolutely ridiculous," Fowle said. Community service would have made more sense, she said. "It's something that's going to make someone realize I did screw up, and I'm going to remember this, and I'm not going to do something like this again."

Hall's attorney, public defender Terence Patton, did not return calls for comment. Nor did Commonwealth's Attorney Daniel M. Chichester or Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney George Elsasser, who handled the case.

Elsasser argued in court that had Ballin been hit by the drink, he might have gotten into a serious accident with injuries. Hall also was found guilty of reckless driving, assault against Ballin and assault and battery against Fowle. For her conviction on those charges, the jury recommended she be fined $1,000.

According to court documents, Hall is unemployed and, with her husband's salary, the couple takes in $30,384 a year. She receives $388 a month in food stamps.

"It doesn't seem right for her not to be around," said Porter, who is watching one of Hall's three children, ages 4, 6 and 8. The younger two are with their grandparents. "We just hope that whatever they do, don't let them keep her. Without her, I don't know what I'll do."

Hall said she has cried every day she has spent locked up and wakes most days to find clumps of hair on her pillow from the stress. She shares a cell with two other women and spends 19 hours a day in the cell, she said.

When Hall talks about the incident, she sometimes jokes about how she will only fly over Virginia from now on and says other inmates sometimes throw things in her direction and say, "Watch out McMissile."

But in other moments, when she talks about the reality of a felony conviction, her expression goes blank. She was supposed to start nursing school the day after she was sent to jail, and she wonders what job she will be able to get once potential employers do a background check.

"Now people are going to see me as an angry, road rage, convicted felon. And it really upsets me," she said. "I must have been wrong . . . but seriously, God. Lesson learned. Lesson learned is one hour in this place."

© 2007 The Washington Post Company


Two years in prison for such an outburst may be considered a little excessive, but I suppose one has to look at it from both sides: a well marked projectile could have caused a massive accident, but at the same time we humans to have a tendancy to sometimes freak out. I know I have gotten into physical situations in which my actions deserved some sort of reprimand, but a mother of three going to prison for two years?

My guess would be that the judge is going to be lenient and lower her sentence, however.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:00 am
by dragon wench
Wow...
I think I'm sort of speechless here. I went through several reactions when I read this story. Initially, the thought of a Mc Dee's item being used as a projectile was amusing, in a way. But then as I continued I felt increasing disbelief. Yes, indeed.. Something like this could have caused a fatal accident, but it didn't, and two years in jail seems exceptionally heavy-handed, especially given the situation.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:07 am
by fable
If it's appealed, it will be quashed. Better still, if it gets to the governor's office, he'll pardon her in a blaze of flag-waving publicity.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:01 pm
by galraen
Well 2 years does seem a tad excessive, but did she have a police history, 'form' as it's known as here?

That she merrited punishment is, I think, beyond doubt but community service would have seemed more appropriate, unless she had previous convictions.

However, some people seem to think that the fact she had 3 kids should have a bearing on her punishment, and I strongly disagree with that concept. The punishment should fit the crime, not the irrelevant circumstances of the perpetrator.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 4:02 pm
by Gilliatt
I have seen drunk drivers who actually killed people get away with less than that.

While everything can be a missile, would they consider a child throwing snowballs as dangerous as someone throwing grenades? :rolleyes:

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:23 pm
by Chimaera182
That's extremely excessive, but I have to say that, as a driver in south Florida, it's also understandable. People drive like complete lunatics here! I have longed to do many violent things to the drivers down here, and flinging a beverage into their window is extremely low on the list. But I can understand the excessive sentence, too, seeing how they wouldn't exactly want to encourage similar behavior in others. But honestly, it is soooo tempting in many cases.:mischief:

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:55 am
by Silur
I'm kind of confused here... Isn't almost every state in the US complaining that they don't have room in their prisons for all the hardened criminals out there? I guess I can see why now...

Depressing story, on a number of different levels.

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 6:37 am
by fable
Silur wrote:I'm kind of confused here... Isn't almost every state in the US complaining that they don't have room in their prisons for all the hardened criminals out there? I guess I can see why now...
Don't you have bullfights, Silur? Generalizations about the US are about as accurate as generalizations about Europe. Some states are complaining, but it isn't a problem for others. Treatment within prisons also varies widely from state to state, from food to available facilities to simply the way they are viewed (if at all) as human beings.

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:28 am
by Moonbiter
fable wrote:Don't you have bullfights, Silur? Generalizations about the US are about as accurate as generalizations about Europe. Some states are complaining, but it isn't a problem for others. Treatment within prisons also varies widely from state to state, from food to available facilities to simply the way they are viewed (if at all) as human beings.
Err, Fable, that's not a generalization, that's a fact. You seem to have a bug up your posterior regarding generalizations about the US lately.

We can start with this article here:

Prison Blues: How America's Foolish Sentencing Policies Endanger Public Safety

I'm not going to paste the entire thing, but I'll put up this:

In state after state, prison capacity is at record highs, but the prison population is even higher. The average American prison system now operates at 15.4 percent over capacity.

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:07 am
by fable
Moonbiter wrote:Err, Fable, that's not a generalization, that's a fact. You seem to have a bug up your posterior regarding generalizations about the US lately.
Only because Silur is deliberately posting in that vein to goad us USians on. :D
We can start with this article here:

Prison Blues: How America's Foolish Sentencing Policies Endanger Public Safety

I'm not going to paste the entire thing, but I'll put up this:

In state after state, prison capacity is at record highs, but the prison population is even higher. The average American prison system now operates at 15.4 percent over capacity.
First problem is that the entire article is advocacy, not reporting. It is aimed at coming to a single conclusion: that the US prison system should be redirected to house only violent criminals. The Cato Institute has nothing against increasement money spent on enforcement and prisons; it's whole approach is simply to say "The system is going out of control--because we have too many non-violent offenders in jail." The fact that much of their support base comes from large corporations who understandably don't advocate "white collar criminals" like the Enron folks going to jail, should be considered.

There are problems with this source. The research I've done on a couple of their documents in the past showed me that the Cato Institute was very capable of isolating figures out of context, using statistics as a method of disguising true results, and quoting sources improperly who even objected to the way their comments were being applied.

While writing this, I did a check with a regular source of mine, the non-particsan Sourcewatch. Here are a few of the things they have to say about the Cato Institute:

In November 2002, shortly after Cato was named the "Best Advocacy Website" by the Web Marketing Association, the Alexa ratings service issued a report saying that it was "the most popular think tank site over the past three months," receiving a total of 188,901 unique visitors during the previous month of September.

The Cato Institute has been a long-time advocate of Social Security privatization...It is worth noting that the website SocialSecurity.org is run by the Cato Institute, under the heading Project on Social Security Choice.

Media mogul Rupert Murdoch previously served on the board of directors of Cato, which has numerous ties to the Republican Party. Cato often differs with Republican Party positions on specific issues, such as the 2003 decision by U.S. President George W. Bush to go to war with Iraq...Sometimes, however, it has proven willing to set aside its libertarian principles - such as supporting a Bush administration moves to restrict civil liberties as part of the war on terror. In 2002, a Cato news release endorsed new Justice Department guidelines giving greater latitude to FBI agents to monitor Internet sites, libraries and religious institutions. "As reported in the press, the new FBI surveillance guidelines present no serious problems," declared Cato legal affairs analyst Roger Pilon, a former Reagan administration official who writes frequent Cato commentaries...

The Institute's yearly funding has climbed above $8 million, more than twice what it was in 1992. The organization's most recent annual report exults: "We've moved into a beautiful new $13.7 million headquarters at 1000 Massachusetts Avenue and have only $1 million in debt remaining on it as we enter 1997." Dozens of huge corporations, eager to roll back government regulatory powers, are among Cato's largest donors.

Financial firms now contributing generously to Cato include American Express, Chase Manhattan Bank, Chemical Bank, Citicorp/Citibank, Commonwealth Fund, Prudential Securities and Salomon Brothers. Energy conglomerates include: Chevron Companies, Exxon Company, Shell Oil Company and Tenneco Gas, as well as the American Petroleum Institute, Amoco Foundation and Atlantic Richfield Foundation. Cato's pharmaceutical donors include Eli Lilly & Company, Merck & Company and Pfizer, Inc.


I mention all this only to indicate that the Cato folks are not sources of nonpartisan facts, but instead play the Washington insider advocacy game of researching bits of facts that can be reinterpreted and woven into a tapestry of whatever color they wish.

On this subject, as any other, I would take whatever they say with a cruise missile loaded to the brim with salt. Just my POV.

Oh, and note: I'm not arguing that the US has a lack of problems with its prison system. I just know that on a state level, it varies from state to state. I can't speak to federal prisons, especially not with the Bush administration having established so many franchises around the world. :rolleyes:

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:42 am
by Moonbiter
@Fable:

I actually found that article by googling "lack of prison space." Every other article I found on the subject backs it up. As for how "non-partisan" SourceWatch is compared to Cato... Pot, meet kettle. but I'm not getting into that here. ;)

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:28 am
by fable
Moonbiter wrote:I actually found that article by googling "lack of prison space." Every other article I found on the subject backs it up.
The phrasing of the quesiton in itself implies the kind of response you'll receive, so I'm not surprised. But I'm also not in disagreement with much of this; only as a knee-jerk response that it applies to *all* the US. Which it doesn't. There are states where prison crowding isn't an issue. Just not many. ;) And again, it's a matter of state jurisdication, and regional culture. Non-USians might be surprised to learn just how different the law is from state to state, and the penalties that apply.

Just as an example, in Massahusetts, with parents' consent, a child can get married at the ripe old age of 14--12, if female. But in West Virginia, the uniform age is 18 (unless pregnancy is an issue), and a medical check up for VD is required. Committing a crime in the right state can get you a slap on the wrist; in the wrong one, you could end up doing 10 years for compound felonies.
As for how "non-partisan" SourceWatch is compared to Cato... Pot, meet kettle. but I'm not getting into that here. ;)
Oh, I never claimed SourceWatch was non-prejudicial! But the facts they present on the Cato Institute are accurate, surprisingly well-balanced (if you note the comments about Republican support, for example, on SourceWatch website), and more forthcoming than the CI's disclosures about itself. And the focus is on the CI and its platforms, not the platforms of SourceWatch.

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:21 pm
by Lady Dragonfly
I am not sure, the prisons were overcrowded or the common sense prevailed, but that woman got probation instead of jail time.

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:18 pm
by Aqua-chan
Lady Dragonfly wrote:I am not sure, the prisons were overcrowded or the common sense prevailed, but that woman got probation instead of jail time.
Just an elaboration...

STAFFORD, Va. - A woman convicted of a felony for throwing a cup of ice into a car that cut her off in traffic was sentenced to probation instead of prison, a judge ruled Wednesday.

Jessica Hall faced between two and five years in prison after she was convicted last month of maliciously throwing a missile — the cup of ice — into an occupied vehicle. No one was injured in the incident last summer.

“The facts of this case ... suggest that the sentence in this case should be reduced,” Judge Frank A. Hoss Jr. told Hall, who thanked the judge and cried.

Hall must remain on good behavior for five years and also must pay fines and court costs.

She has been in jail since Jan. 4 and it wasn’t immediately clear whether she would be released Wednesday.

Prosecutor Daniel M. Chichester said Hall’s actions were serious, even though no one was injured. “It is important to remember that it is not what is thrown but the danger created by that act,” Chichester said.

On a sticky day in July, Hall was driving north on Interstate 95 with her children and her pregnant sister. Traffic had slowed to a crawl when, she said, another car cut her off twice, once causing her to swerve onto the shoulder...


Knew the Judge would lean. I'm glad some one in this case had some sense: I'd like to meet the jury members who came up with that outrageous sentence in the first place.

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:53 pm
by Gilliatt
Aqua-chan wrote:Knew the Judge would lean. I'm glad some one in this case had some sense:


I am glad too, this sentence was not only ridiculous, it was cruel and unfair.
I'd like to meet the jury members who came up with that outrageous sentence in the first place.
Plato said 2500 years ago, after Socrates death, that you should not let incompetent people decide the faith of others. I still wonder why some have not get it yet.