Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

F/D multiclass or dual... which is better?

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to Black Isle Studios' Icewind Dale and its Heart of Winter and Trials of the Luremaster expansions.
Post Reply
User avatar
Klorox
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:17 pm
Contact:

F/D multiclass or dual... which is better?

Post by Klorox »

With TotLM installed, I can see advantages to both:

F/D multiclass:

All abilities the whole game
30/30 maximum level
Better THAC0
No "weak" period of development

F9>D dualclass

***** in Scimitar
More HP
***** in Scimitar ;)

Seriously though, which is a better character? Please keep in mind that I'll be playing with a 4 character party, so my levels will jump up a bit faster than a 6 man party.

TIA
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives."
-- Jackie Robinson

Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu!
User avatar
Crenshinibon
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:35 pm
Contact:

Post by Crenshinibon »

I'd go with the dual class as, if they use a scimitar which grants bonus attacks, they carry over to the elemental form. You could potentially be a 27/30 dual class, but that's far from now. It all depends on when you want your druid part and what you'll use it for.
“The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially.”
User avatar
Klorox
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Klorox »

If I go with a dual classed character, I'd dual at level 9, maybe level 13 at the most.
"A life is not important, except in the impact it has on other lives."
-- Jackie Robinson

Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-mênu!
User avatar
Crenshinibon
Posts: 2665
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:35 pm
Contact:

Post by Crenshinibon »

Do you plan to have your character in elemental form a lot? If so I'd suggest multiclass then.

Note that items that increase your attacks per round carry over to your other forms.

That's sufficient as the prime purpose of the dual class is get five points in scimitar.
“The world breaks every one and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially.”
User avatar
GawainBS
Posts: 4452
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:43 am
Location: Glabbeek, Belgium.
Contact:

Post by GawainBS »

I'd dual at 13. That 1/2 extra attack is neat.
User avatar
Aerich
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 12:50 am
Contact:

Post by Aerich »

Dual class, unless you are starting from scratch on HoF. I prefer a multiclass, but I've been convinced that a melee-focused druid should be dual-classed.

It's a looong wait to regain your fighter class after dualing at 13. Are you playing on an elevated difficulty level (e.g. more than Core), or planning to do HoF with the same party after completing the game? Otherwise, I'd recommend dualing at 9. Earlier access to the druid spells, summons in particular, is worth a slightly lesser combat ability IMO.

You don't say what your other characters are, but with 4 characters it isn't as easy to "carry" a recently-dualed character, as you need your characters to pull their weight and, on average, kill more enemies each.
When your back is against the wall... the other guy is in a whole lotta trouble.
User avatar
ultramarine
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:21 am
Contact:

Post by ultramarine »

I'd play a multi f/d in a party of 4 because all the druid ability is available. Dualing at 9/13 makes a stronger character but I'd not go without a druid in the start/middle of the game.

Also depends how you use the druid. For me, i use her as a slinger and for spell casting almost all the time. So all i really need is f(3)>druid. I find the game easier this way though the character is nowhere as powerful as a f(13)>druid or a f/d in terms of melee.
Post Reply