Page 1 of 1

Far Cry 2

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:12 am
by BANNER
I HAVE NOT SEEN FAR CRY2 THEARD IN GameBanshee Forums I DONT NOW WATS THE REASON BUT FOR ALL MEMMBER I GOT A GOOD NEW FIRST LOOK OF THE [url="http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=978008"]FAR CRY 2 REVIEW[/url] & GREAT SCREENSHOT

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 3:47 am
by Xandax
Thread moved.
And do not post entirely in caps, as it is considered shouting when online and can cause people to take offense of you and your posting.


__________________
GameBanshee Moderator
GameBanshee - Make Your Gaming Scream
Forum rules

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:10 am
by BANNER
baned from ur site

ok, i have been baned from ur site

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:14 am
by DesR85
GameBanshee is all about RPGs. No other genre. That's why an FPS like Far Cry won't be reported here. As for the game itself, can't say I'm looking forward to it as I have a great dislike for open-world games.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:33 am
by GawainBS
BANNER wrote:ok, i have been baned from ur site
This struck as a true paradox. ;)

Des, why the dislike of openworld games?

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:31 am
by DesR85
GawainBS wrote: Des, why the dislike of openworld games?
Poor performance. I've seen that in Oblivion, STALKER and Gothic 3. Of these three games, I was only able to complete STALKER but I did it just to get it over with, not because I enjoyed the game. It's one thing for them to have steep system requirements, but what is the point when performance is lousy no matter whether you meet the minimum or recommended specs?

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 8:34 am
by GawainBS
It's not necessary linked. Morrowind didn't suffer because of that.

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:47 pm
by DesR85
Are there other factors? Sure there are. Bugs, glitches, etc. But I gave up on the Witcher even though the game is very stable. Why? Performance issues. I was so frustrated with tinkering around to get a playable frame rate that I quit. I might play it again but only when I get a better machine.

And whenever I read about open-world games, I hear a lot of complaints of performance issues. These games want to remain open-world, and at the same time, focus on better graphics. All this just leads to crappy performance. How can a game be enjoyable when performance isn't stable? I'm sure not going to enjoy it when performance goes from smooth to slideshow-fest.

It may sound like me nit-picking here, but I consider performance and stability as important as the other aspects of a game.

Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2008 3:16 am
by GawainBS
I understand that. I lower my resolution a notch to get a better performance too. I can live with bad graphics, but the game has to run smooth. That's much more important.

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 12:30 pm
by Ronan
I like openworld games as I can play them later when I have a computer that can handle the game easily and there are enough patches to fix most o the bugs. I update my computer so rarely that I can't play the new high-graphics games most of the time. Right now I can't play most of the games that will be released and I couldn't play CoD 4 or The Witcher.

Other FPS:s just aren't as good as openworlded.

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:53 am
by repapips
Farcry is one of the best shooting game i ever played. it allows you to have a better grasp on real life weapons!!!

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:42 am
by DesR85
repapips wrote:Farcry is one of the best shooting game i ever played. it allows you to have a better grasp on real life weapons!!!
Well, I didn't find Far Cry that great, though. I preferred Half-Life 2 more. As for the weapons, it feels kind of floaty and underpowered.

As for Far Cry 2, I have to admit I am somewhat interested in it after watching some of it's gameplay videos.

Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:17 pm
by repapips
maybe because you are into more futuristic game... we have different preferences in gaming.... but i must admit HL2 is one hell of a game.. it has this touch of addictive multiplayer... bu Farcry2 has its own identitiy.. and it rocks!!!

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 1:18 am
by DesR85
repapips wrote:maybe because you are into more futuristic game... we have different preferences in gaming....
Ehh... not really. I'm fine with any setting, be they WW2, past, present or the future. It's just that I didn't find Far Cry that appealing compared to other shooters released during that same period, such as Half Life 2.

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:54 pm
by SupaCat
DesR85 wrote:Well, I didn't find Far Cry that great, though. I preferred Half-Life 2 more. As for the weapons, it feels kind of floaty and underpowered.
True, when I fired my M16 I couldn't believe it would kill something. Bad weapon design and bad sound effects, the same problem was in Battefield 1942.
repapips wrote: bu Farcry2 has its own identitiy.. and it rocks!!!
How do you know that? People tent to do that, say a game rocks before they even played it? Own identity? What does that really mean?

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2008 8:50 am
by strjms72
Even quicker than i thought, get onto this

[url]http://www.widescreengamingforum.com...=143018#143018[/url]

you need to adjust it to

X 1.31
Y 1.253

or whatever works for you.

This is well worth doing the game is much more playable, especially vehicles.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:45 am
by DesR85
Gave it a spin since two days ago and I find it good so far. I find the setting itself interesting followed by the open-ended nature of the game. Weapons can degrade overtime, so I have to use them wisely instead of expending ammo freely (and wearing out the weapon sooner), though it sucks when the gun jams in the middle of a firefight. A lot more if you're using Western-made weapons.

Graphics overall are great and on par with most games released this year, though there are some slight graphical oddities in some instances, but nothing serious. The AI is pretty decent and able to put up a fight, but not really bright when driving a vehicle as they tend to crash a lot (especially into you). The use of the environment to your advantage is a plus, especially when you burn a patch of grass and wait for the wind to blow the fire right into the direction of the enemy encampment. :p

There are some things I didn't like about the game, such as the repetitiveness of the missions, coupled with a dull story and exploring the game world can be irritating because not only do you have to clear out checkpoints manned by both AFP and UFLL gangs and roaming vehicle patrols but the fact that these enemies respawn rather quickly (less than a minute) meaning that you will have to clear the same checkpoint over and over again and destroy the same vehicle patrol again.

P.S. I finished the game a few weeks ago and my experiences are the same as I was playing the game in the first week (mentioned in this post). Overall, good game, but is marred by flaws such as a dull and forgettable story coupled by the irritating respawn rates and repetitive missions.

Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:21 pm
by GearGamer
I ended up playing Far Cry 2, I'm not all that crazy about it. I was really looking forward to this game but the driving really bothers me.

Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:18 am
by NarutoAngel221
Online activation fails to work, did manual an the cd runs then it stops.