Disclaimer

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 3:48 pm

Screen name: Anatres
Any and all postings under this screen name are intended as the ruminations of said screen name only. Said screen name has no intent with said postings to insult, flame, sway, cajole or otherwise change anyone over to any beliefs stated in said postings.

Said screen name intends only to impart his knowledge through debate, question and answers to further provoke thought in any willing member of said debate or discussion.

Said screen name offers a general apology to any member of this bulletin board he may have offended in any way.

Said screen name reserves the right to state his opinions in a civil and (hopefully) informative manner. And to spam where he finds that appropiate.....

.....END

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 3:54 pm

Anatres-Don't worry there,buddy

.You're doing a great job

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 3:56 pm

@Brink; not really worried, but some of the responses I get seem a bit testy.

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:01 pm

That kind of response is bound to happen in a discussion about religion

Btw,I'm not taking part in the theological discussion anymore since you guys have better knowledge than I do in that field

.(That doesn't mean that I won't read it though

)

[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Brink ]

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:05 pm

Well, at least in my case, alot of it is just speculation. But I'm getting a bit bored with it as it seems to be getting redundant and a bit pedantic.

Maybe we should start a thread about anthropology. That ought to get some lively debate going

!

EDIT: spelling - again

!

[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Anatres ]

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:13 pm

Anthropology??

You should try finding a subject that isn't such a sensitive matter (ie. religion

) yet something that everyone can relate to

[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Brink ]

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:13 pm

@Anatres ....I believe the problem is....some don't know what civil is.

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:19 pm

@Weasel; that and some folks just take the free exchange of ideas too personally.

@Brink; I was being facetious

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:22 pm

Anatres-I know

(did you not see the

at the end?

)

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:29 pm

@Brink; are you telling me what to see?

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:35 pm

Anatres-I don't know

.Was I telling you what to see??

Darkpoet · Post by **Darkpoet** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:37 pm

How about a discussion on how many chips are in a chocolate chip cookie?

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:42 pm

@DP; nah, not controversial enough! Unless you want to debate the merits of Oatmeal/raisin verses Chocolate chip!!!

Darkpoet · Post by **Darkpoet** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:43 pm

Sure no problem. Since I hate raisins, the chip wins.

Brink · Post by **Brink** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:45 pm

I'l' be right back people

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:52 pm

Originally posted by Anatres:
<STRONG>@Brink; are you telling me what to see? </STRONG>

Are you telling Brink that you are asking if Brink is telling you what you see?

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 4:57 pm

@Weasel; listen, if i can't see exactly what I want to see then noone is ging to tell me that they can see anything different!!

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Fri May 18, 2001 5:00 pm

Anatres: Great post in Poll: Pollitical Beliefs vs Allignment

As for the seeing part....I'm at a loss

Anatres · Post by **Anatres** » Fri May 18, 2001 5:02 pm

@Weasel; not quite back on firm spam footing are we?

EDIT: Oh, and thanks.....

[ 05-18-2001: Message edited by: Anatres ]

Weasel · Post by **Weasel** » Fri May 18, 2001 5:04 pm

@Anatres ....I know my limits..