Guilds
You're right though... It's better than 56KB dialup!!!Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>I've only got a 256/64 cabel-modem - got it yesteday
"Think on this, arrogant mageling: even the mightiest archmage has no spells strong enough to let him cheat death. Some take the road of lichdom... a living death. The rest of us find graves, and our dust is no grander than that of the next man. So when next you lord it over some farmer with your fireballs, remember: we all master spells enough to die"
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
I have a question:
What sort of groups do you all intend to form for playing. This guild accepts all characters of any alignment, but do you lot plan to good-only and evil-only parties?
[ 08-03-2001: Message edited by: Sellsword ]
What sort of groups do you all intend to form for playing. This guild accepts all characters of any alignment, but do you lot plan to good-only and evil-only parties?
[ 08-03-2001: Message edited by: Sellsword ]
"Security isn't a dirty word Blackadder; crevice is a dirty word, but security isn't."
Originally posted by Sellsword:
<STRONG>I have a question:
What sort of groups do you all intend to form for playing. This guild accepts all characters of any alignment, but do you lot plan to good-only and evil-only parties?
</STRONG>
I can play both ways. It will depend on what each party needs.
I wouldn't expect a Lawful Good Paladin going with a Lawful Evil Rogue.
"Vile and evil, yes. But, That's Weasel" From BS's book, MD 20/20: Fine Wines of Rocky Flop.
I would think a mix would be fun. I've usually had mixed parties in the BG series.
"Think on this, arrogant mageling: even the mightiest archmage has no spells strong enough to let him cheat death. Some take the road of lichdom... a living death. The rest of us find graves, and our dust is no grander than that of the next man. So when next you lord it over some farmer with your fireballs, remember: we all master spells enough to die"
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
You've done that already?Originally posted by Xandax:
<STRONG>Changing the aligment of your character.
</STRONG>
Well its nice to know that you take updating so seriously, but I removed that from the post because I'd changed my mind (I normally play good characters, but True Neutral is just so druidic).
"Security isn't a dirty word Blackadder; crevice is a dirty word, but security isn't."
Okay -'ll change it backOriginally posted by Sellsword:
<STRONG>You've done that already?
Well its nice to know that you take updating so seriously, but I removed that from the post because I'd changed my mind (I normally play good characters, but True Neutral is just so druidic).</STRONG>
Well I was online anyway and editing 2 words on a page and throwing it onto the site dosen't take longer than writing this post
EDIT: There back to True Neutral
[ 08-03-2001: Message edited by: Xandax ]
Insert signature here.
Sellsword... some of us are just SOOOO on top of things!!! Right Xan???
"Think on this, arrogant mageling: even the mightiest archmage has no spells strong enough to let him cheat death. Some take the road of lichdom... a living death. The rest of us find graves, and our dust is no grander than that of the next man. So when next you lord it over some farmer with your fireballs, remember: we all master spells enough to die"
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
And thats the last you'll be hearing from me for a while I'm afraid ( ). I'm away for the next few days visiting relatives; I may be back on Tuesday, but Wednesday is more likely. I've done all my voting, so you shouldn't need me until then and by the time I get back I'll have a biography for the site.
Keep up the momentum!
Bye!
). I'm away for the next few days visiting relatives; I may be back on Tuesday, but Wednesday is more likely. I've done all my voting, so you shouldn't need me until then and by the time I get back I'll have a biography for the site.Keep up the momentum!
Bye!
"Security isn't a dirty word Blackadder; crevice is a dirty word, but security isn't."
I feel soooo loved.Originally posted by Nippy:
<STRONG>@ mikeheitz
People are voting for you in the leadership pole, check it out!</STRONG>
"Think on this, arrogant mageling: even the mightiest archmage has no spells strong enough to let him cheat death. Some take the road of lichdom... a living death. The rest of us find graves, and our dust is no grander than that of the next man. So when next you lord it over some farmer with your fireballs, remember: we all master spells enough to die"
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Here is a question regarding Character creation...
I used the Char Generator downloaded from Wizards.com. Is it just me or do they not want people with high attributes? Or is a 12 considered a decent attribute??? I was torn between where I wanted to put points and am not sure I want an INT of 12 for a Sorcerer. I boosted charisma to 18 and was just about out of points.
Just curious what everyone thought about creating 3rd ed. chars. Also, how different is 3rd ed going to be that low #'s like those I have for some att's will be ok???
I used the Char Generator downloaded from Wizards.com. Is it just me or do they not want people with high attributes? Or is a 12 considered a decent attribute??? I was torn between where I wanted to put points and am not sure I want an INT of 12 for a Sorcerer. I boosted charisma to 18 and was just about out of points.
Just curious what everyone thought about creating 3rd ed. chars. Also, how different is 3rd ed going to be that low #'s like those I have for some att's will be ok???
"Think on this, arrogant mageling: even the mightiest archmage has no spells strong enough to let him cheat death. Some take the road of lichdom... a living death. The rest of us find graves, and our dust is no grander than that of the next man. So when next you lord it over some farmer with your fireballs, remember: we all master spells enough to die"
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Ithil Sprandorn, Lord Mage of Saskar, said to prisoner wizard Thorstel
Well there are some tricks that I've learnt while using the generator.Originally posted by mikeheitz:
<STRONG>Here is a question regarding Character creation...
I used the Char Generator downloaded from Wizards.com. Is it just me or do they not want people with high attributes? Or is a 12 considered a decent attribute??? I was torn between where I wanted to put points and am not sure I want an INT of 12 for a Sorcerer. I boosted charisma to 18 and was just about out of points.
Just curious what everyone thought about creating 3rd ed. chars. Also, how different is 3rd ed going to be that low #'s like those I have for some att's will be ok???</STRONG>
Every 4th level - you get permission to increase a stat by 1. So instead of placing 18 in CHA at start (and thus spending 16 points on that) you could have taken 16 in CHA (only spending 10 points) and then at level 4 increased it to 17 and at 8 to 18 etc.
This way you would have maximed your gain from these points (If you can follow my meaning
)Also you can go beoynd 18 with these bonus-increases.
Insert signature here.