Okay, this one goes out to the real "cracks" of the game.
My prob is as follows: I killed Seark some long time ago (about 10 hours of playing) within the anomen quest of revenging his sister.
Now i can see that he fails his test for knighthood. But I dont really want to play all the game again, but also want to have this buddy pass his test.
So if anyone could help me out...
maybe with the codes for shadowkeeper. I tried finding out myself which variable to change but I'm stuck. There must be one which tells the game that saerk is dead, isn't it?
Thanks a lot guys for helping me out!!
And yes, I know Anomen is arrogant and that, but he's kinda good fighter/cleric thats why i wanna keep him.
Mabrook
can one revive saerk??? Help please
can one revive saerk??? Help please
The worst sins are those which you are going to regret the most not having done them when you could!
First of all, do you have a savegame from right before his test? It's very difficult to change things after. If so, try this:
Using Shadowkeeper,
Note: If not romancing Anomen, make sure your party reputation is greater than 9, or he will still fail his test.
Hope this helps!
Using Shadowkeeper,
- Change global variable AnomenDecide to 4
- Change global variable KillSaerk to 2
- Delete the global variable SPRITE_IS_DEADSAERK
Note: If not romancing Anomen, make sure your party reputation is greater than 9, or he will still fail his test.
Hope this helps!
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
Thanks a lot!
Hi Sojourner!
Thank you a lot! It worked fine now. You saved me a lot of trouble and much time.
I know its some kind of cheating, but I didnt know the outcome when i let him kill Saerk early on the game. And I think there isn't much advantage for my party killing him, so everything can be made clear with my conscience...
Thanks again and be sure, you made someone happy today!!
Mabrook
P.S. Astonishing how fast your reply was!!
Hi Sojourner!
Thank you a lot! It worked fine now. You saved me a lot of trouble and much time.
I know its some kind of cheating, but I didnt know the outcome when i let him kill Saerk early on the game. And I think there isn't much advantage for my party killing him, so everything can be made clear with my conscience...
Thanks again and be sure, you made someone happy today!!
Mabrook
P.S. Astonishing how fast your reply was!!
The worst sins are those which you are going to regret the most not having done them when you could!
You're welcome.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.