Everyone who has played TOSC knows who shandalar is, he's the tough a$$ mage in ulgoth's beard.
it's not that hard to kill him and you get decent loot from him including robe of the neutral archmage, and lots of spell scrolls, what i wondered was that your reputation takes a hit if you kill him... he can't be all good if he's neutral, so is he some famous-kind of character in the books like Drizzt, or did they just implement a penalty for a simple murder? There's no ulgoth's beard in the walkthrough section, so that's why i'm asking...
i didn't really find killing him (26000xp, robe, scrolls, +3 staff) to be worth losing 10 rep, maybe after i only have durlag to go through since you hardly need rep in there...
Shandalar
- Locke Da'averan
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 11:00 pm
- Location: Between North Pole and South pole, on the surface
- Contact:
for me, 26K xp are definitly worth the 10 reputatation points! i think that this is the highest xp for killing a creature in BG, correct me if i'm wrong. it's just the attitude of the guy that makes me want to do it... plus, you can always upgrade the rep in a temple - the trick is to kill him when your rep is above 18 (i think), so you don't lose classes for rangers and palladins.
At this point in the game, I don't care about the robe and staff, but I always have my thief drink a couple of potions of Master Thievery and pickpocket the scrolls off Shandalar .
I don't think the XP for killing him is worth the reputation loss, especially since my party is never hurting for XP after finishing Durlag's Tower.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.