Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

Favorite Ranger Kit?

This forum is to be used for all discussions pertaining to BioWare's Baldur's Gate II: Shadows of Amn.
Post Reply

Favorite ranger kit

Beastmaster
4
19%
Beastmaster
8
38%
Beastmaster
9
43%
Beastmaster
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 21

User avatar
Impaler987
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:57 pm
Contact:

Favorite Ranger Kit?

Post by Impaler987 »

What's you guys' favorite ranger kit?

Stalker's my favorite; he may not do 90% of the party's enemies with missle weapons like the archer, but I find the stalker a lot more fun to play as well as a lot more versatile. The stalker, RP-wise, also feels more like someone who actually takes charge and sets up the party's attack strategy, which is what the PC as leader should be doing. The archer feels like too much of a supporting character.

Don't get me wrong, I love archers as well and know their power. I just like stalkers better, and at higher levels they can be just as powerful.

Regular ranger is pointless unless you plan on dualling to cleric; come on, what self-respecting ranger wears metal and denies himself the stealth ability?

Beastmaster ... ha. Well, actually, dualled to cleric (yes, it can be done w/ ToB installed) even he becomes a monster. But still, it's not a kit I particularly like.
User avatar
hwttdz
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by hwttdz »

This is the best question ever. I love rangers. I really like all of them so much but they're all so different. The one's I figure worthwhile are the elven archer, the stalker probally elven as well, and the human archer with 2 *'s in slings dualed to a cleric. I love the backstab of the stalker. I think that this is one of the best balanced classes with reguards to kits. Beastmaster is the odd man out. I think for theives bounty hunter is the odd man out. For clerics the choice is made for you. For fighters I think only kensai's are of use. Paladins are well balanced. I think that cover's it. I should start my own thread about kits. Sorry Impaler987.
User avatar
Impaler987
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:57 pm
Contact:

Post by Impaler987 »

Originally posted by hwttdz
and the human archer with 2 *'s in slings dualed to a cleric.
Do you have ToB installed? If not, you're good to go. Otherwise you can't dual either an archer or a stalker to a cleric. With ToB installed only plain rangers and beastmasters can dual to cleric.
User avatar
hwttdz
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Post by hwttdz »

I was actually unaware of that. I guess you could make your character then dual. Then install ToB.
User avatar
VonDondu
Posts: 3185
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by VonDondu »

Originally posted by Impaler987
what self-respecting ranger wears metal and denies himself the stealth ability?
The answer is, Rangers who are played by people who play them exactly like Fighters (and there seem to be a lot of people who do just that). What's the point? They might as well play a Fighter.

I'm with you: if you're going to play a Ranger like a Ranger, then you might as well play a Stalker. So the Stalker kit gets my vote.

I don't care for Beastmasters that much, either. If I were trying to create the least effective party possible, that's one of the kits I would choose. (I'm just trying to bait people by saying that, of course.) :)
User avatar
Skuld
Posts: 1054
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Location: Long Island
Contact:

Post by Skuld »

Here's what I say, if you want a beastmaster, just play a Fighter/Druid. It'll be much more effective. And as far as the other 3 go I really can't decide. Backstab is awesome, but I rarely use it. Being that I use parties of no more the 4 chars there's usually no room for a ranged weapon user. But I did do my first successful run through IWD with a duo of an elven ranger and a thief/illusionist. I'm gonna have to go with the stalker.
"I'll take the stupid one who decided to threaten us, instead of shoot us when he had the chance" - Bao-Dur
User avatar
Bruce Lee
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Lund, Skane, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Bruce Lee »

It is a close one between archers and stalkers and even though I have never played a stalker myself my vote goes to the stalker kit. The reason I haven't played a stalker myself is that Valygar is so damn good!
You can't handle the truth!
User avatar
ARcheR_S_
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 1:43 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Post by ARcheR_S_ »

ARcheRS all the way BABY!!!!

They just rock in my opinion: I play an ARcheR and he has the most kills.......earned the most experience (for the party that is)
AND; he kills the toughest opponents (Dragons, linches, Mindflayers, Irenicus, KANGAXXXXXX!!!!!!!!)

Just name it.......he does it.
And in my party he doesnt has a supportive rol.
Id better say: the rest needs too support my ARcheR....not the other way around.


-ARcheR_S_
"Sometimes Dreams are wiser than waking"

"One day I will leave this world and Dream myself to Reality"

"Dream your life, live that Dream"

"I have a Dream"........Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.
User avatar
gnomethingy
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 8:25 am
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Post by gnomethingy »

If I play a straight ranger, I only use stealth outside..

I wear metal armour inside, since your shouldnt be able to hide unless your in the wilderness

I like regular rangers, since having a small selection of spells is cool, stealth is handy when you need it which isnt that often and there the only warrior subclass I feel happy about duel weilding with, I dont like the rp implications of any other duelweilder, dont ask why or ill bore you to death.....
-->Instert cool sig here<--
User avatar
ARcheR_S_
Posts: 248
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2002 1:43 pm
Location: Holland
Contact:

Post by ARcheR_S_ »

Why??





















Hehehehe
"Sometimes Dreams are wiser than waking"

"One day I will leave this world and Dream myself to Reality"

"Dream your life, live that Dream"

"I have a Dream"........Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.
User avatar
Robnark
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2002 11:00 pm
Location: the Floating World
Contact:

Post by Robnark »

hehe. i say archers all the way.
want to backstab? take a thief.
normal ranger? fighters are far more useful at the same job.
beastmaster? no self respecting treehugger would choose this over a druid kit, and no sensible gamer would choose this for anything other than novelty value.

archers are a unique class, incredibly powerful, and make a great unit to back up a kensai. archers all the way.
Here where the flattering and mendacious swarm
Of lying epitaths their secrets keep,
At last incapable of further harm
The lewd forefathers of the village sleep.
User avatar
Impaler987
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:57 pm
Contact:

Post by Impaler987 »

Originally posted by Robnark
want to backstab? take a thief.
normal ranger? fighters are far more useful at the same job.
beastmaster? no self respecting treehugger would choose this over a druid kit, and no sensible gamer would choose this for anything other than novelty value.
Want to backstab and get your ass kicked afterwards? Yeah, take a thief. Want to backstab and kick everyone's ass afterwards? Take the stalker. And despite the lower multiplier I found that the stalker usually does more damage on a backstab than the straight thief.

I pretty much agree with the comments on the normal ranger and beastmaster though. Except a beastmaster/cleric dual-class can actually be quite effective; essentially a druid with some added stealth, access to the cleric as well as the druid line of spells, the additional spell slots he gets for dualling to cleric actually make his special animal summoning spells somewhat meaningful, and he gets a cool familiar. But yeah, single-class beastmasters do suck, big-time.
User avatar
Robnark
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2002 11:00 pm
Location: the Floating World
Contact:

Post by Robnark »

actually, that's quite true about the backstab thing, but i never really use it, and find thieves a more versatile class to take with me in case i decide to.
basically, a ranger with backstab. not too shoddy really. personal taste, i suppose
:)
Here where the flattering and mendacious swarm
Of lying epitaths their secrets keep,
At last incapable of further harm
The lewd forefathers of the village sleep.
User avatar
Impaler987
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 9:57 pm
Contact:

Post by Impaler987 »

Well, if you really never use the backstab, why not take a swashbuckler? Swashbucklers are another favorite class of mine; they receive the same amount of thieving skill points as straight thieves, plus they can actually fight some.

When playing a solo-multiplayer game, I take a swashbuckler to be my true thief. Then, if I want a backstabber, I take a class that specializes in it and can bring other cool abilities to the table. In the case of a good-aligned party, the stalker is perfect for this because he has his own wide range of talents plus the backstab.
User avatar
Robnark
Posts: 3208
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2002 11:00 pm
Location: the Floating World
Contact:

Post by Robnark »

Originally posted by Impaler987
Well, if you really never use the backstab, why not take a swashbuckler?
hehe. i do :D
they're damn good in combat, have the thief skills, and i don't care about a shoddy backstab. also, it makes sense if you're taking a stalker as a backstabber. a damn fine kit is the swashbuckler
:)
Here where the flattering and mendacious swarm
Of lying epitaths their secrets keep,
At last incapable of further harm
The lewd forefathers of the village sleep.
User avatar
Bruce Lee
Posts: 1712
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Lund, Skane, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Bruce Lee »

Ah yes the swashbuckler! Reminds me of my fine half-orc swashbuckler Dench Fastmouth, he could sweep the ladies of their feet and take on any man in a swordfight.
You can't handle the truth!
User avatar
gnomethingy
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2002 8:25 am
Location: Omnipresent
Contact:

Post by gnomethingy »

Originally posted by ARcheR_S_
Why??


Hehehehe



Aside from the blade and swashy which arnt warrior subclasses the ranger is the only class with any sort of emphasis on duel weilding, theres alot more too it than that... but since you added the hehehehe im sure you dont actually want to know
-->Instert cool sig here<--
User avatar
smity
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 11:29 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by smity »

archers rule!!!! at the beginning of ToB Illarsera came with a few black reaver friends, I used a called shot and his hp dropped from uninjured to badly injured in one hit (naturally I followed up and killed on the next hit)
Life is a game- don't loose
Post Reply