-HOF is pretty stupid. Why make ridiculous monsters (super goblins) when the designers could have just replaced each goblin with 2 frost giants and a mage.
-I think HOF was a bit of a cop out. It would have been much cooler killing lots (and lots) of strong monsters (not souped up ridiculous ones). Give the bosses some extra hit dice and a spiffy new magic weapon with a high level mage or two for back up.
-Anyway, all I'm trying to say is a high level run through the game should have been more like Throne of Bhaal (although the setting would not change just the type and number of monster generally encountered). Strong monsters, more quest experience, not silly souped up ones.
Not impressed with HOF
Yeah, HoF is . . . tedious. I find it absolutely annoying. I'm currently in Kuldahar, and I'm finding that at 25th level characters, about half of the monsters you fight don't even give you experience. That's just super-frustrating, because the fight you go through to kill these megamonsters is nervewracking, only to be rewarded with 93 gp, maybe a gem, and no xp. So far, I've only found one new item worth keeping (the Golden Heart of XXXX), and vendors don't seem to have anything better than what I already have.
I'll play it till the end, but believe me, I'll be forcing myself to do so. After I finish HoF, I'm gonna start brand new with new chars.
I'll play it till the end, but believe me, I'll be forcing myself to do so. After I finish HoF, I'm gonna start brand new with new chars.
Good things come to those that wait--but only what's left over from those that hustle.
- aberrant80
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2001 10:00 pm
- Location: Malaysia
- Contact:
So they don't change the XP tables for HoF mode? That's plain stupid. I really hate the way the XP system is rigged in this game.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
- Skooter327
- Posts: 536
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2002 8:36 pm
- Location: Minnesota
- Contact: