right now im just in past 3 with:
Minsc,Viconia, Jahiera, yoshimo, keldorn, and my pc evocation specialist.
everyone says keldorn is great but even though minsc with his boots of speed seem to surpass keldorn. perhaps he gets much better with the boots.
id love to keel vic and kel together but they constantly bicker,so im guessing theyll kill each other.
i want to replace yoshi and maybe either vic or keldorn if they attack each other. any suggestions?
party alterations
-
fable
- Posts: 30676
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 12:00 pm
- Location: The sun, the moon, and the stars.
- Contact:
Major suggestion of mine: keep to a good/neutral or evil/neutral party. Good and evil aligned NPCs don't mix. Eventually, they'll fall out, and attack one another or threaten to leave.
Other than that, try to keep a good balance of fighters and spellcasters, of melee and ranged folks. For the rest, design your party as you wish--there's no perfect party--and enjoy.
Other than that, try to keep a good balance of fighters and spellcasters, of melee and ranged folks. For the rest, design your party as you wish--there's no perfect party--and enjoy.
To the Righteous belong the fruits of violent victory. The rest of us will have to settle for warm friends, warm lovers, and a wink from a quietly supportive universe.
It is possible to keep both Keldorn and Viconia until the end of the game, if you keep them from bickering. But your guess is right, it won't be long before they fight. I'd say replace Viconia with Anomen. If you haven't already played the game through before, keep Yoshimo.
There's nothing a little poison couldn't cure...
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
What happened here was the gradual habituation of the people, ... to receiving decisions deliberated in secret; to believing that the situation was so complicated that the government had to act on information which the people could not understand, or so dangerous that, even if he people could understand it, it could not be released because of national security.
