Iam making a sorcerer (drow) but iam not sure if i shoudl go for a plain sorcer or 2 lvls of paladin of charisma bonusess and imunity to fear and fear aura.Or should i go for a bard /sorcerer?
Stats feats would be welcome
Sorcerer
a drow sorc/paladin will have his xp penalized, since neither is his favorit class. so would a sorc/bard. this will add to the drow's already slow advance.
if you have a small party (3 or less, i thimk), this might work...
if you want a pal/sorc go for human or aasimar, for bard/sorc, go for human. there's pros and cons to each, it's up to you.
my suggestion would be to go for the bard1/sorc. i have a bard1/mage, with lingering song feat - works pretty nice. the 2 pla levels are a better addition to a frontliner a spellcaster, imho.
if you have a small party (3 or less, i thimk), this might work...
if you want a pal/sorc go for human or aasimar, for bard/sorc, go for human. there's pros and cons to each, it's up to you.
my suggestion would be to go for the bard1/sorc. i have a bard1/mage, with lingering song feat - works pretty nice. the 2 pla levels are a better addition to a frontliner a spellcaster, imho.
- Stilgar
- Posts: 4079
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 11:00 am
- Location: The Netherlands - Sietch Tabr
- Contact:
I would keep the spellcaster classes (sorcerer/wizzard) plain classes.
Cause you want the highlevel spells ASAP.
Also sorcerers make great leaders cause charaisma is their prime stat, and with a little int. you get lot's of skills.
And spellcraft isn't realy important cause you don't need to scribe scrolls.
But if you want to multiclass I agree with Mirk, try not to get an exp.penalty.
Doens't a gnome/elf sub-race have a sorcerer as faforiteclass?
Cause you want the highlevel spells ASAP.
Also sorcerers make great leaders cause charaisma is their prime stat, and with a little int. you get lot's of skills.
And spellcraft isn't realy important cause you don't need to scribe scrolls.
But if you want to multiclass I agree with Mirk, try not to get an exp.penalty.
Doens't a gnome/elf sub-race have a sorcerer as faforiteclass?
I do not have the touch, nor do I have the power.
Wild elf has sorcerer as preferred class.
A wild elf paladin/sorcerer would be a bit of an rp stretch....but it would work.
A wild elf paladin/sorcerer would be a bit of an rp stretch....but it would work.
Check out Mirrors Online a premier NWN2 roleplaying persistent world and D20 campaign world publishing project.
- lonely wolf
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:09 am
- Location: israel
- Contact:
I agree with you so much, that I can't even explain that...Originally posted by Stilgar
I would keep the spellcaster classes (sorcerer/wizzard) plain classes.
Cause you want the highlevel spells ASAP.
Also sorcerers make great leaders cause charaisma is their prime stat, and with a little int. you get lot's of skills.
And spellcraft isn't realy important cause you don't need to scribe scrolls.
But if you want to multiclass I agree with Mirk, try not to get an exp.penalty.
Doens't a gnome/elf sub-race have a sorcerer as faforiteclass?
a wild elf would be fine, though every race that can fit the sorcerer's abilities would be great.
ELVES RULE!!!!!
Sorcerer could use 10 ranks of Spellcraft to get the Aqua Mortis/Spirit of the Flame/Aegis of Rime/Scion of Storms feats. Not half bad, those.
[url="http://www.sorcerers.net/Games/BG2/SpellsReference/Main.htm"]Baldur's Gate 2 Spells Reference[/url]: Strategy, tips, tricks, bugs, cheese and corrections to the manual.
Yes, those are fun feats..on my wizard I have the fire one and I am all like "lemme go and cast me some stoneskin, mirror image, shield, haste, fireshield, and globe of invuln" and then I'm all walkin into a group of baddies and I say "Hey you, baddie types, come here, I have something to show you.." and they are all like "Hey, you shouldn't be here, but we will follow you anyway" and then I am all like "BOOM!" and I throw out me some of them big ole sunfires and toast everything and then scream and run like a girl when the only things that are left are immy to fire.