Please note that new user registrations disabled at this time.

The Empire Strikes Back: Luke....could....go....all....the....way!!

Anything goes... just keep it clean.
User avatar
Scayde
Posts: 8739
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:05 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by Scayde »

I'm going with the Panthers...I don't know enough about either team to call the score, but I am feeling like they have the want to that will put them over the top.

Scayde Moody
(Pronounced Shayde)

The virtue of self sacrifice is the lie perpetuated by the weak to enslave the strong
User avatar
Tybaltus
Posts: 10341
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by Tybaltus »

Its really scary here in New England (Boston Area) :D EVERYONE is picking the Patriots to win, and win BIG. Ive heard as high as 28-7.

To compare local frenzy vs the general public or general fans (you guys), it really is two different worlds.

Im surprised more people are picking the Panthers over the Patriots, but...damn, this is a really even game...OH gosh, I cant wait!

A couple comments on posts/responses...
By Thug
This is why I say Panthers over the over rated pat's with a big win, two scores at least. The panther's running game is just going to control the clock, give Brady a lot less time to be active on the field. Also the Panthers play hard, real hard. I think Mcnabb is tougher than mr. bradypants. So I can see Brady getting hit a little too hard.
OK, what makes this matchup interesting is that the Pats run defense is the best of the league, and Im not saying that because Im a Pats fan. They absolutely shut down the Dolphins run attack, and the Dolphins are maybe one step below the Panthers rush attack, so I dont think the answer is to just run the ball. In order for the Panthers to win, theyve got to go to Muhammed and Smith by way of Delhomme, which certainly can be done. Lets give these guys their due credit.

Panthers play hard, no doubt about it. But New England plays hard too. I think if I were to compare the two, Panthers are a bit more smash mouth, and Patriots are a bit more technical. But both can bust a gut.
by HLD
If wer're picking scores, I'm taking the Patriots 16-13.
Image Thats a good pick (heh its really close to mine!) But traditionally, when two teams like this collide, I wouldnt set your mind to chugging beer whenever someone hits the endzone.
By BS
BTW, Panther are 7-0 in games this season decided by 3 points or less.
Now theres an interesting statistic...hrm...still, they have lost games in overtime (of course they allowed the TD instead of the fieldgoal.

Also another statistic, those teams that went 5-4 over their last 9 games in the regular season have traditionally gotten thwacked in the Superbowl, and no team to have gone 5-4 in the last 9 regular season games has ever won the superbowl. (Last team to make it with that record to the superbowl: '94 Chargers) Carolina went 5-4 in their last 9 regular season games.
----------------------
This is not the 2001 Superbowl. The Patriots are not the Rams of 2001. The biggest difference was that the Rams went into the game overconfident, but the Patriots, I can tell you, are not overconfident--though many of their fans are)
----------------------
My favorite quote of these off weeks was when Jake Delhomme said he wanted to be like Tom Brady. In response Brady said something like, "He wants to be me? Who wants to be a slow immobile Quarterback? Heck, I want to be Michael Vick!" :D
---------------------
“Caw, Caw!” The call of the wild calls you. Are you listening? Do you dare challenge their power? Do you dare invade? Nature will always triumph in the end.

[color=sky blue]I know that I die gracefully in vain. I know inside detiorates in pain.[/color]-Razed in Black
User avatar
Idioteque
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Idioteque »

Patriots 27 Panthers 17


As a Chargers fan my season was over long ago. I hope they trade down from #1 and grab Larry Fitzgerald and extra picks.
User avatar
Tybaltus
Posts: 10341
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by Tybaltus »

Originally posted by Idioteque
As a Chargers fan my season was over long ago. I hope they trade down from #1 and grab Larry Fitzgerald and extra picks.
If Fitzgerald is allowed to be in the draft. Hes a great player and has got a great attitude. Certainly a breath of fresh air in the WR position. So, I certainly agree with you there.

But I dont know whether San Diego's first agenda will be WR. I was figuring theyd be one of the teams begging for a QB. I mean Manning, Roethlisberger, and Rivers are all excellent QBs, and will all be picked early.

Wait...I should really save up my draft energy for AFTER the superbowl :D
“Caw, Caw!” The call of the wild calls you. Are you listening? Do you dare challenge their power? Do you dare invade? Nature will always triumph in the end.

[color=sky blue]I know that I die gracefully in vain. I know inside detiorates in pain.[/color]-Razed in Black
User avatar
Idioteque
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Idioteque »

Originally posted by Tybaltus
If Fitzgerald is allowed to be in the draft. Hes a great player and has got a great attitude. Certainly a breath of fresh air in the WR position. So, I certainly agree with you there.


He was cleared for the draft a few weeks ago. He's only a sophomore but it was technically 3 years since he played in high school.

I still like Brees but he hasn't been given a fair chance. His first year as a starter his so called go to guy was Curtis Conway who dropped half the passes that came his way. Boston was an improvement this year but he started the year with suspensions and injuries so they never really clicked. Plus the Chargers had a banged up line all season and had to start untested undrafted lineman. No matter how good Tomlinson makes them look :D they're still below average.
User avatar
RandomThug
Posts: 2795
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 11:00 am
Location: Nowheresville
Contact:

Post by RandomThug »

Ok Ok Ok

So Champ Baily for Portis.

Opinions? Questions? Gripes?

I believe the redskins will be a much different team this year, MUCH different. With the Leadership of Gibbs the years of Brunell and the power and speed of LaVarr, Coles, Portis, Canidate, Smoot, Ramsy... I mean wow.
Jackie Treehorn: People forget the brain is the biggest sex organ.
The Dude: On you maybe.
User avatar
Ned Flanders
Posts: 4867
Joined: Mon May 28, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Springfield
Contact:

Post by Ned Flanders »

You can stop at Gibbs, RT, the Redskins will be a dangerous bunch next year. I think they still need a QB though. Brunell isn't bad, but he won't play 16 games. Maybe Gibbs can find the rock Mark Rypien crawled under.
Crush enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of the women.
User avatar
HighLordDave
Posts: 4062
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: Between Middle-Earth and the Galaxy Far, Far Away
Contact:

Post by HighLordDave »

If all else fails, Doug Williams is in Tampa.

If the Super Bowl were in April, the Redskins would have won the last three.

Is Portis a reliable 1,300 yard back or a product of the Denver system that chews guys up and spits them out? Will Brunell develop the same chemistry with Laveranues Coles and Rod Gardner that he had with Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell? Can Fred Smoot step into the #1 CB role vacated by Champ Bailey?

How will Joe Gibbs do with his old nemesis (Bill Parcells), his hold nemesis's protege (Tom Coughlin) and the most successful of Mike Holmgren's guys (Andy Reid) in the same division?

There are lots of questions for your guys, RandomThug, and the road to the playoffs (for right now) isn't through Washington.
Jesus saves! And takes half damage!

If brute force doesn't work, you're not using enough.
User avatar
Bloodstalker
Posts: 15512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2001 10:00 pm
Location: Hell if I know
Contact:

Post by Bloodstalker »

Ramsey will be a top line starting QB sometime in the future. Likely he'll wind up starting at least half the games this year if he stays due to injury if nothing else.

I think Portis is what the Skins think they are getting. Gibbs imported RB's all the way to three rings in the 80's and 90's. Bailey was gonna be gone regardless of the deal getting done or not, so in actuallity, the skins got portis for a player they weren't going to have in the line-up anyway next year, and a 2nd round pick. And Candidate is likely gone, and good riddance.
I ain't too sure about Smoot though, but it doesn't matter unless Washington beefs up the pass rush anyway. They could have NE's secondary and still get beat all day with their defensive line.

My early take on the division is the Giants leading. Dallas still has holes to fill, Philly still is a one man show that's getting worse on defense each year as they lose people.

One last skins jab.....Gibbs won three championships to Parcells 2 in the same amount of years in the league together. :D



More interesting, how the hell do these players forget to file their free agency forms? :eek:
Lord of Lurkers

Guess what? I got a fever, and the only prescription is more cowbell!
User avatar
Grendel
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 10:37 am
Location: Hiding from Extinction
Contact:

Post by Grendel »

News flash - 49ers implode. It is going to be a loooong year I fear
Ex-Member, Clan of One
Evil Gnome Cult
User avatar
Idioteque
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 11:48 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Post by Idioteque »

I don't like Portis cuz he bumper Tomlinson from the pro bowl. Tomlinson led the league in yards! The Broncos know Quentin Griffin can get 1300 yards so they get the best corner in the league for nothing. The Redskins need Portis tho so its not bad but he seems fragile.

So who will the Chargers get? Eli Manning, Jeff Garcia, Jon Kitna... I'd rather they pick up Kitna and draft Fitzgerald to play across from Boston. If they do pick up a FA Qb they will probably trade down for multiple picks tho.
Post Reply